Abstract
In this paper, we explore potential innovations that could lead to breakthrough developments in Internet technologies. The deep integration of the Internet and economic society brings professionalized service capacity demand, while existing Internet infrastructure with its current technological systems still face a number of challenges, such as intelligence, diversification, personalization, robustness, and efficiency. First, we analyze the actual foundation of innovation and specify the basic technical features of a novel network. Then, we propose a fully dimensionally definable open architecture as the primary direction, and consider reshaping baseline technologies as a starting point and discuss the core operational mechanisms of the novel network based on such reshaped baseline technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rexford J, Dovrolis C. Future Internet architecture: clean-slate versus evolutionary research. Commun ACM, 2010, 53: 36–40
Pan J, Paul S, Jain R. A survey of the research on future internet architectures. IEEE Commun Mag, 2011, 49: 26–36
McKeown N, Anderson T, Balakrishnan H, et al. OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev, 2008, 38: 69–74
Hakiri A, Gokhale A, Berthou P, et al. Software-defined networking: challenges and research opportunities for future Internet. Comput Netw, 2014, 75: 453–471
Han B, Gopalakrishnan V, Ji L S, et al. Network function virtualization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations. IEEE Commun Mag, 2015, 53: 90–97
Mijumbi R, Serrat J, Gorricho J L, et al. Management and orchestration challenges in network functions virtualization. IEEE Commun Mag, 2016, 54: 98–105
Balasubramaniam S, Leibnitz K, Lio P, et al. Biological principles for future internet architecture design. IEEE Commun Mag, 2011, 49: 44–52
Ousterhout J K, Cherenson A R, Douglis F, et al. The sprite network operating system. Computer, 2002, 21: 23–36
Mei H. Understanding “software-defined” from an OS perspective: technical challenges and research issues. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 126101
Wood T, Ramakrishnan K K, Hwang J, et al. Toward a software-based network: integrating software defined networking and network function virtualization. IEEE Netw, 2015, 29: 36–41
Mijumbi R, Serrat J, Gorricho J L, et al. Network function virtualization: state-of-the-art and research challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2017, 18: 236–262
Hu Y X, Lan J L, Wu J X. Providing personalized converged services based on flexible network reconfiguration. Sci China Inf Sci, 2011, 54: 334–347
Li S, Hu D, Fang W, et al. Protocol oblivious forwarding (POF): software-defined networking with enhanced programmability. IEEE Netw, 2017, 31: 58–66
Wu Z, Lu K, Wang X, et al. Alleviating network congestion for HPC clusters with fat-tree interconnection leveraging software-defined networking. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Systems & Informatics, Hangzhou, 2017. 808–813
Wang C, Li X, Chen Y, et al. Service-oriented Architecture on FPGA-based MPSoC. IEEE Trans Parall Distrib Syst, 2017, 28: 2993–3006
Wen R H, Feng G, Tan W, et al. Protocol stack mapping of software defined protocol for next generation mobile networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kuala Lumpur, 2016. 1–6
Liu Y, Wei S J. What is still missing in China for the development of artificial intelligence chips (in Chinese)? Chin Integr Circ, 2017, 26: 20–23
Jacobson V, Smetters D K, Thornton J D, et al. Networking named content. Commun ACM, 2012, 55: 117–124
Ahlgren B, Dannewitz C, Imbrenda C, et al. A survey of information-centric networking. IEEE Commun Mag, 2012, 50: 26–36
Dong F, Cheng C, Guo S. Design and research on GeoIP. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperation Work in Design, Fudan, 2010. 13–17
Zhang H, Quan W, Chao H C, et al. Smart identifier network: a collaborative architecture for the future internet. IEEE Netw, 2016, 30: 46–51
Clark D D, Partridge C, Ramming J C, et al. A knowledge plane for the Internet. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, Karlsruhe, 2003. 3–10
Mestres A, Rodrigueznatal A, Carner J, et al. Knowledge-Defined Networking. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev, 2016, 47: 2–10
Hu H C, Wu J X, Wang Z P, et al. Mimic defense: a designed-in cybersecurity defense framework. IET Inform Secur, 2018, 12: 226–237
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61521003), National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) (Grant No. 2015AA016102), Medium and Long-Term Development Strategy Research of National Engineering Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2016-ZCQ-04), Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (Grant No. 16DZ1120503), and Program for Science and Technology Development of Henan Province (Grant No. 162102210034). Thanks for the help from professor Julong LAN, researcher Peng YI, associate researcher Yuxiang HU, Doctor Xiaohui ZHANG, Doctor Peng WANG and many other fellows in our team for their helpful ideas during the composition of this paper. Meanwhile, thanks for the valuable suggestions from academician Yunjie LIU, academician Jianping WU, professor Xiaohu YOU, professor Hongke ZHANG, professor Chengqi CHENG and professor Shaojun WEI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, J. Thoughts on the development of novel network technology. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 61, 101301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9456-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9456-x