Skip to main content
Log in

Online remaining-useful-life estimation with a Bayesian-updated expectation-conditional-maximization algorithm and a modified Bayesian-model-averaging method

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online remaining-useful-life (RUL) estimation is an effective method with respect to ensuring the safety of complex-huge systems. Generally, current methods assume a specific degradation model when degradation values are observed in the initial degradation phase. However, this assumption may not always be robust enough owing to the often-ambiguous inherent incipient-degradation characteristic. Therefore, besides model-parameter uncertainty, the uncertainty of the degradation model is worth examining in online RUL estimations. In this paper, a Bayesian-updated expectation-conditional-maximization (ECM) algorithm is adopted to address the uncertainty of prior parameters, and a modified Bayesian-model-averaging method is used to deal with the uncertainty of the degradation model. Then, simulation studies are conducted to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed fusion algorithm. Results suggest that the Bayesian-updated ECM algorithm and modified Bayesian-model-averaging method effectively address the associated uncertainties of model parameters and the degradation model itself. Finally, we apply the proposed fusion algorithm to predict the RUL of a gyroscope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang J X, Hu C H, He X, et al. A novel lifetime estimation method for two-phase degrading systems. IEEE Trans Rel, 2019, 68: 689–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Si X S, Li T M, Zhang Q. A general stochastic degradation modeling approach for prognostics of degrading systems with surviving and uncertain measurements. IEEE Trans Rel, 2019, 68: 1080–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Si X S, Li T M, Zhang Q, et al. Prognostics for linear stochastic degrading systems with survival measurements. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2020, 67: 3202–3215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Si X S, Hu C H, Li T M, et al. A joint order-replacement policy for deteriorating components with reliability constraint. Sci China Inf Sci, 2021, 64: 189203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xi J, Wang C, Liu H, et al. Completely distributed guaranteed-performance consensualization for high-order multiagent systems with switching topologies. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 2019, 49: 1338–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Si X S, Li T M, Zhang Q, et al. An optimal condition-based replacement method for systems with observed degradation signals. IEEE Trans Rel, 2018, 67: 1281–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu C H, Pei H, Si X S, et al. A prognostic model based on DBN and diffusion process for degrading bearing. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2947839

  8. Zhang Z, Si X, Hu C, et al. Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: a review on Wiener-process-based methods. Eur J Oper Res, 2018, 271: 775–796

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hudak S J J, Saxena A, Bucci R J, et al. Development of Standard Methods of Testing and Analyzing Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Data. Westinghouse R&D Center Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 1978

  10. Meeker W Q, Escobar L A. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ye Z S, Xie M, Tang L C, et al. Semiparametric estimation of Gamma processes for deteriorating products. Technometrics, 2014, 56: 504–513

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Z J, Deng Y M, Mastrangelo C. Model selection for degradation-based Bayesian reliability analysis. J Manufacturing Syst, 2015, 37: 72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng C-Y, Tseng S-T. Mis-specification analysis of linear degradation models. IEEE Trans Rel, 2009, 58: 444–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng C-Y, Tseng S-T. Statistical lifetime inference with Skew-Wiener linear degradation models. IEEE Trans Rel, 2013, 62: 338–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramos A A. The minimum description length principle and model selection in spectropolarimetry. Astrophys J, 2006, 646: 1445–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bozdogan H. Akaike’s information criterion and recent developments in information complexity. J Math Psychol, 2000, 44: 62–91

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen K T P, Fouladirad M, Grall A. Model selection for degradation modeling and prognosis with health monitoring data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2018, 169: 105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdessalem A B, Dervilis N, Wagg D, et al. Model selection and parameter estimation in structural dynamics using approximate Bayesian computation. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2018, 99: 306–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Si X S, Wang W, Chen M Y, et al. A degradation path-dependent approach for remaining useful life estimation with an exact and closed-form solution. Eur J Oper Res, 2013, 226: 53–66

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Meng X L, Rubin D B. Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: a general framework. Biometrika, 1993, 80: 267–278

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen N, Tsui K L. Condition monitoring and remaining useful life prediction using degradation signals: revisited. IIE Trans, 2013, 45: 939–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chakraborty S, Gebraeel N, Lawley M, et al. Residual-life estimation for components with non-symmetric priors. IIE Trans, 2009, 41: 372–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gebraeel N Z, Lawley M A, Li R, et al. Residual-life distributions from component degradation signals: a Bayesian approach. IIE Trans, 2005, 37: 543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nitithumbundit T, Chan J S K. An ECM algorithm for skewed multivariate variance Gamma distribution in normal mean-variance representation. 2015. arXiv: 1504.01239

  25. van Dyk D A, Meng X, Rubin D B. Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: computing the asymptotic variance. Stat Sin, 1995, 5: 55–75

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang X, Yan X. A new statistical precipitation downscaling method with Bayesian model averaging: a case study in China. Clim Dyn, 2015, 45: 2541–2555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoeting J A, Madigan D, Raftery A E, et al. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat Sci, 1999, 14: 382–401

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Gebraeel N, Elwany A, Pan J. Residual life predictions in the absence of prior degradation knowledge. IEEE Trans Rel, 2009, 58: 106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Si X S, Chen M Y, Wang W, et al. Specifying measurement errors for required lifetime estimation performance. Eur J Oper Res, 2013, 231: 631–644

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1306100) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61922089, 61773386, 61833016, 61903376, 61673311).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaosheng Si.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Si, X., Hu, C. et al. Online remaining-useful-life estimation with a Bayesian-updated expectation-conditional-maximization algorithm and a modified Bayesian-model-averaging method. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 64, 112205 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2724-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2724-5

Keywords

Navigation