Abstract
Barrier functions have been reported to be useful in quantifying the safety of some dynamic systems. Usually, when using the barrier functions, we try to transform safety analysis issues of dynamic systems into a class of reachability issues from a safe set to an unsafe set. This article presents a novel sufficient safety criterion for some dynamic systems. The proposed criterion is based on the barrier function and works as long as the upper bound of the barrier function is kept non-positive. Further, we present a mathematical description of fault safety for some dynamic system that experienced a fault at a certain time and propose a corresponding fault safety criterion for the aforementioned system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chai Y, Zhang K, Mao Y F, et al. Technology of Dynamic System Operational Safety (in Chinese). Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2019
Chai Y, Mao W B, Ren H, et al. Research on operational safety assessment for spacecraft launch system: progress and challenges (in Chinese). Acta Autom Sin, 2019, 45: 1829–1845
Bouamama B O, Biswas G, Loureiro R, et al. Graphical methods for diagnosis of dynamic systems: review. Annu Rev Control, 2014, 38: 199–219
Kasai N, Fujimoto Y, Yamashita I, et al. The qualitative risk assessment of an electrolytic hydrogen generation system. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41: 13308–13314
Cunha S B. A review of quantitative risk assessment of onshore pipelines. J Loss Prevent Process Ind, 2016, 44: 282–298
Ahn J, Chang D. Fuzzy-based HAZOP study for process industry. J Hazard Mater, 2016, 317: 303–311
Chang Y Q, Han Z F, Zou X T. Online assessment of complex industrial processes operating performance based on improved dynamic causality diagram (in Chinese). Control Theory Appl, 2017, 34: 345–354
Khan F, Hashemi S J, Paltrinieri N, et al. Dynamic risk management: a contemporary approach to process safety management. Curr Opin Chem Eng, 2016, 14: 9–17
Naderpour M, Lu J, Zhang G Q. An abnormal situation modeling method to assist operators in safety-critical systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2015, 133: 33–47
Villa V, Paltrinieri N, Khan F, et al. Towards dynamic risk analysis: a review of the risk assessment approach and its limitations in the chemical process industry. Saf Sci, 2016, 89: 77–93
Busby J S, Green B, Hutchison D. Analysis of affordance, time, and adaptation in the assessment of industrial control system cybersecurity risk. Risk Anal, 2017, 37: 1298–1314
Li H T. Research on safety analysis method based on safety risk state (in Chinese). Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2012
Kriaa S, Pietre-Cambacedes L, Bouissou M, et al. A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2015, 139: 156–178
Talebberrouane M, Khan F, Lounis Z. Availability analysis of safety critical systems using advanced fault tree and stochastic Petri net formalisms. J Loss Prevent Process Ind, 2016, 44: 193–203
Guo Y B, Meng X L, Wang D G, et al. Comprehensive risk evaluation of long-distance oil and gas transportation pipelines using a fuzzy Petri net model. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 2016, 33: 18–29
Wang X, Mahulea C, Silva M. Diagnosis of time Petri nets using fault diagnosis graph. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2015, 60: 2321–2335
Landucci G, Argenti F, Cozzani V, et al. Assessment of attack likelihood to support security risk assessment studies for chemical facilities. Process Saf Environ Protection, 2017, 110: 102–114
Barua S, Gao X D, Pasman H, et al. Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment. J Loss Prevention Process Ind, 2016, 41: 399–410
Ye L B. A study on operation safety analysis and online assessment of industrial processes (in Chinese). Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011
Romdlony M Z, Jayawardhana B. Stabilization with guaranteed safety using control Lyapunov-barrier function. Automatica, 2016, 66: 39–47
Prajna S, Rantzer A. On the necessity of barrier certificates. In: Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, 2005. 526–531
Prajna S, Jadbabaie A, Pappas G J. Stochastic safety verification using barrier certificates. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2004
Kong H, Song X Y, Han D, et al. A new barrier certificate for safety verification of hybrid systems. Comput J, 2014, 57: 1033–1045
Wang G B, He J F, Liu J, et al. Safety verification of interconnected hybrid systems using barrier certificates. Math Problem Eng, 2016, 2016: 1–10
Wang G B, Liu J, Sun H Y, et al. Safety verification of state/time-driven hybrid systems using barrier certificates. In: Proceedings of the 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), 2016. 2483–2489
Zhu Z R, Chai Y, Yang Z M. A novel kind of sufficient conditions for safety judgement based on control barrier function. Sci China Inf Sci, 2021, 64: 199205
Ames A D, Grizzle J W, Tabuada P. Control barrier function based quadratic programs with application to adaptive cruise control. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2014. 6271–6278
Xu X R, Tabuada P, Grizzle J W, et al. Robustness of control barrier functions for safety critical control. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, 48: 54–61
Glotfelter P, Cortes J, Egerstedt M. Nonsmooth barrier functions with applications to multi-robot systems. IEEE Control Syst Lett, 2017, 1: 310–315
Borrmann U, Wang L, Ames A D, et al. Control barrier certificates for safe swarm behavior. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, 48: 68–73
Wang L, Ames A D, Egerstedt M. Safety barrier certificates for collisions-free multirobot systems. IEEE Trans Robot, 2017, 33: 661–674
Wang L, Ames A, Egerstedt M. Safety barrier certificates for heterogeneous multi-robot systems. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), Boston, 2016. 5213–5218
Ames A D, Xu X, Grizzle J W, et al. Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2017, 62: 3861–3876
Agrawal A, Sreenath K. Discrete control barrier functions for safety critical control of discrete systems with application to bipedal robot navigation. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems Conference, Cambridge, 2017
Tong S C, Li Y M. Observer-based adaptive fuzzy backstepping control of uncertain nonlinear pure-feedback systems. Sci China Inf Sci, 2014, 57: 012204
Jain A K, Bhasin S. Tracking control of uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown constant input delay. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin, 2020, 7: 420–425
Tong S C, Li Y M. Robust adaptive fuzzy backstepping output feedback tracking control for nonlinear system with dynamic uncertainties. Sci China Inf Sci, 2010, 53: 307–324
Gomes J P P, Galvao R K H, Yoneyama T, et al. A new degradation indicator based on a statistical anomaly approach. IEEE Trans Rel, 2016, 65: 326–335
Zheng J F, Si X S, Hu C H, et al. A nonlinear prognostic model for degrading systems with three-source variability. IEEE Trans Rel, 2016, 65: 736–750
Department of Mathematics, East China Normal University. Mathematical Analysis (in Chinese). 3rd. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1999
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61633005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, Z., Chai, Y., Yang, Z. et al. Safety criteria based on barrier function under the framework of boundedness for some dynamic systems. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 65, 122203 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3028-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3028-4