Skip to main content
Log in

Toward practical gas sensing with rapid recovery semiconducting carbon nanotube film sensors

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanomaterials have been considered as promising materials to construct highly sensitive and miniaturized gas sensors due to their high ratio of surface to volume, but almost all of the reported nanomaterials based resistive gas sensors are difficult to use in the practical system mainly owing to the long recovery time and non-equilibrium state at room temperature. Here, we demonstrate a gate assistant technology to realize the rapid recovery to an equilibrium state in semiconducting carbon nanotube (CNT) thin-film gas sensors and promote the CNT-based gas sensors to reach the practical application level. Specifically, we construct highly uniform gas sensors based on semiconducting solution-derived CNT film and accelerate the gas molecules desorption by applying a voltage on the back gate (substrate), which is named gate-assistant recovery technology. By combining the gate-assistant recovery technology and a modified concentration calculation method, highly reproducible detection systems have been realized by using a custom-built printed circuit board (PCB) based data acquisition circuits to execute a real-time rapid detection of H2 in the air at room temperature, and especially exhibits a record response time of 9 s and recovery time of 50 s under a resolution of 10 ppm, which outperformed previous low dimensional nanomaterials based portable H2 detection systems. The gate-assistant rapid recovery and related concentration calculation technologies are helpful to promote the nanomaterials-based gas sensors to practical application for highly sensitive online gas detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ponnuvelu D V, Dhakshinamoorthy J, Prasad A K, et al. Geometrically controlled Au-decorated ZnO heterojunction nanostructures for NO2 detection. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 2020, 3: 5898–5909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arshak K, Moore E, Lyons G M, et al. A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sens Rev, 2004, 24: 181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nazemi H, Joseph A, Park J, et al. Advanced micro- and nano-gas sensor technology: a review. Sensors, 2019, 19: 1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim H J, Lee J H. Highly sensitive and selective gas sensors using p-type oxide semiconductors: overview. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2014, 192: 607–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan W J, Shi G Q. Graphene-based gas sensors. J Mater Chem A, 2013, 1: 10078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kauffman D R, Star A. Carbon nanotube gas and vapor sensors. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2008, 47: 6550–6570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang M, Brooks L L, Chartuprayoon N, et al. Palladium/single-walled carbon nanotube back-to-back Schottky contact-based hydrogen sensors and their sensing mechanism. ACS Appl Mater Interface, 2014, 6: 319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang T, Nix M B, Yoo B Y, et al. Electrochemically functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube gas sensor. Electroanalysis, 2006, 18: 1153–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Star A, Joshi V, Skarupo S, et al. Gas sensor array based on metal-decorated carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B, 2006, 110: 21014–21020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar D, Chaturvedi P, Saho P, et al. Effect of single wall carbon nanotube networks on gas sensor response and detection limit. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2017, 240: 1134–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding D Y, Chen Z, Rajaputra S, et al. Hydrogen sensors based on aligned carbon nanotubes in an anodic aluminum oxide template with palladium as a top electrode. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2007, 124: 12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y X, Li G H, Wang X W, et al. Poly(ionic liquid)-wrapped single-walled carbon nanotubes for sub-ppb detection of CO2. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 8222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang Y Q, Xiao M M, Wu D, et al. Wafer-scale uniform carbon nanotube transistors for ultrasensitive and label-free detection of disease biomarkers. ACS Nano, 2020, 14: 8866–8874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schroeder V, Savagatrup S, He M, et al. Carbon nanotube chemical sensors. Chem Rev, 2019, 119: 599–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao M M, Liang S B, Han J, et al. Batch fabrication of ultrasensitive carbon nanotube hydrogen sensors with sub-ppm detection limit. ACS Sens, 2018, 3: 749–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li J, Lu Y J, Ye Q, et al. Carbon nanotube sensors for gas and organic vapor detection. Nano Lett, 2003, 3: 929–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson J A, Snow E S, Badescu S C, et al. Role of defects in single-walled carbon nanotube chemical sensors. Nano Lett, 2006, 8: 1747–1751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samanta S K, Fritsch M, Scherf U, et al. Conjugated polymer-assisted dispersion of single-wall carbon nanotubes: the power of polymer wrapping. Acc Chem Res, 2014, 47: 2446–2456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Homenick C M, Rousina-Webb A, Cheng F, et al. High-yield, single-step separation of metallic and semiconducting SWCNTs using block copolymers at low temperatures. J Phys Chem C, 2014, 118: 16156–16164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Geng J, Thomas M D R, Shephard D S, et al. Suppressed electron hopping in a Au nanoparticle/H2S system: development towards a H2S nanosensor. Chem Commun, 2005, 65: 1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maiti A, Rodriguez J A, Law M, et al. SnO2 nanoribbons as NO2 sensors: insights from first principles calculations. Nano Lett, 2003, 3: 1025–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tian J W, Jiang H C, Zhao X H, et al. A Ppb-level hydrogen sensor based on activated Pd nanoparticles loaded on oxidized nickel foam. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2021, 329: 129194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fan Z Y, Lu J G. Gate-refreshable nanowire chemical sensors. Appl Phys Lett, 2005, 86: 123510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peng N, Zhang Q, Lee Y C, et al. Gate modulation in carbon nanotube field effect transistors-based NH3 gas sensors. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2008, 132: 191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tong Y, Lin Z H, Thong J T L, et al. MoS2 oxygen sensor with gate voltage stress induced performance enhancement. Appl Phys Lett, 2015, 107: 123105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ervin M H, Dorsey A M, Salaets N M. Hysteresis contributions to the apparent gate pulse refreshing of carbon nanotube based sensors. Nanotechnology, 2009, 20: 345503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. He Q Y, Zeng Z Y, Yin Z Y, et al. Fabrication of flexible MoS2 thin-film transistor arrays for practical gas-sensing applications. Small, 2012, 8: 2994–2999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Y M, Yu J C, Cui Y, et al. An AC sensing scheme for minimal baseline drift and fast recovery on graphene FET gas sensor. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Solid-state Sensors, 2017. 230–233

  29. Yuan Z, Bariya M, Fahad H M, et al. Trace-level, multi-gas detection for food quality assessment based on decorated silicon transistor arrays. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 1908385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nallon E C, Schnee V P, Bright C, et al. Chemical discrimination with an unmodified graphene chemical sensor. ACS Sens, 2016, 1: 26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar R, Jenjeti R N, Sampath S. Two-dimensional, few-layer MnPS3 for selective NO2 gas sensing under ambient conditions. ACS Sens, 2020, 5: 404–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jang D, Jung G, Jeong Y, et al. Efficient integration of si FET-type gas sensors and barometric pressure sensors on the same substrate. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2019. 630–633

  33. Fine G F, Cavanagh L M, Afonja A, et al. Metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors in environmental monitoring. Sensors-Basel, 2010, 6: 5469–5502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar R, Zheng W, Liu X H, et al. MoS2 based nanomaterials for room temperature gas sensors. Adv Mater Technol, 2020, 5: 1901062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang C X, Yin L W, Zhang L Y, et al. Metal oxide gas sensors: sensitivity and influencing factors. Sensors, 2010, 10: 2088–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen J Q, Chen Z, Boussaid F, et al. Ultra-low-power smart electronic nose system based on three-dimensional tin oxide nanotube arrays. ACS Nano, 2018, 6: 6079–6088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fahad H M, Shiraki H, Amani M, et al. Room temperature multiplexed gas sensing using chemical-sensitive 3.5-nm-thin silicon transistors. Sci Adv, 2017, 3: 1602557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang Y S, Chen Y Y, Wu T T. A passive wireless hydrogen surface acoustic wave sensor based on Pt-coated ZnO nanorods. Nanotechnology, 2010, 21: 095503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jakubik W P. Hydrogen gas-sensing with bilayer structures of WO3 and Pd in SAW and electric systems. Thin Solid Films, 2009, 517: 6188–6191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hsu C S, Lin K W, Chen H I, et al. On a heterostructure field-effect transistor (HFET) based hydrogen sensing system. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36: 15906–15912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jun J, Chou B, Lin J, et al. A hydrogen leakage detection system using self-powered wireless hydrogen sensor nodes. Solid-State Electron, 2007, 51: 1018–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jiang H C, Tian X Y, Deng X W, et al. Low concentration response hydrogen sensors based on wheatstone bridge. Sensors-Basel, 2019, 5: 1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee J S, Oh J, Jun J, et al. Wireless hydrogen smart sensor based on Pt/graphene-immobilized radio-frequency identification tag. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 7783–7790

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program (Grant No. 2016YFA020-1901). The authors thank Dr. Zhongqiu HUA from Peking University for the constructive discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mengmeng Xiao or Zhiyong Zhang.

Additional information

Supporting information

Figures S1–S8. The supporting information is available online at info.scichina.com and link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, F., Xiao, M., Ning, Y. et al. Toward practical gas sensing with rapid recovery semiconducting carbon nanotube film sensors. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 65, 162402 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-021-3286-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-021-3286-3

Keywords

Navigation