Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fully automated computer algorithm for calculating articular contact points with application to knee biomechanics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fully automated computer algorithm for calculating the articular contact points between two bone surface models is presented. The algorithm requires the bone surface models and their relative positions as inputs in order to resolve the articular contact path. In the case of surface model overlap due to measurement errors or as a solution of an optimization procedure, the result is a volumetric estimation of the space confined between the two surfaces. The algorithm is based on attaching a grid of lines to one bone surface model and calculating the intersecting points of each of the lines in the grid with both bone surface models. The contact points are then determined as the closest points between the surfaces along the lines in the grid. The same contact points are used to evaluate any volume that is confined between two overlapping surface models. The algorithm is ideal for use in biomechanical studies, simulations of joint motion, and optimizations that require an iterative process to determine contact path and relative bone position. The algorithm is applied to a Sawbones® knee model that is moved from flexion to extension while being tracked by an optical tracking system. The contact path of the two bones is generated and an example of calculating bone impingement is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asano T, Akagi M, Tanaka K, Tamura J, Nakamura T (2001) In vivo three dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image-matching techniques. Clin Orthop 388:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bansk S, Hodge WA (1996) Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43:638–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks S, Markovich GD, Hodge WA (1997) In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 12:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blankevoort L, Kuiper JH, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ (1991) Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. J Biomech 24:1019–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen E, Ellis RE, Bryant JT, Rudan JF (2001) A computational model of postoperative knee kinematics. Med Image Anal 5:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson JK, Hunt KH (2004) Robots and screw theory, application of kinematics and statics to robotics. Oxford University Press, New York,

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeFrate LE, Sun H, Gill TJ, Rubash HE, Li G (2004) In vivo tibiofemoral contact analysis using 3D MRI-based knee models. J Biomech 37:1499–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Fritz M, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston MA, Labaraca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufrance award: image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop 355:8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Essinger JR, Leyvaraz PF, Heegard HJ, Robertson DD (1989) A mathematical model for the evaluation of the behaviour during flexion of condylar-type knee prostheses. J Biomech 22:1229–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greis PE, Scuderi MG, Mohr A, Bachus KN, Burks RT (2002) Glenohumeral articular contact areas and pressures following labral and osseous injury to the anteroinferior quadrant of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:442–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heino BJ, Powers CM, Terk MR, Ward SR, Lee TQ (2003) Quantification of the patellofemoral joint contact area using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 21:955–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoff WA, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Gabriel SM, Walker SA (1996) Three-dimensional determination of femoral–tibial contact positions under “in vivo” conditions using fluoroscopy. In: Proceedings of the European society of biomechanics, Leuven, pp 28–31

  13. Hsieh YF, Draganich LF, Ho SH, Reider B (2002) The effect of removal and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on the contact characteristics of the patellofemoral joint. Am J Sports Med 30:121–127

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huberti HH, Hayes WC (1984) Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact. J Joint Bone Surg A 66:715–724

    Google Scholar 

  15. Invaco SJ, Mullins E, Coughlin KM, Banks S, Banks A, Beynnon BD (2004) Tibiofemoral kinematic analysis of kneeling after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:906–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klein F (1871) Ueber Liniengeometrie und metrische Geometrie. Mathematische Annalen v, pp 257–303

  17. Komistek RD, Scott RD, Dennis DA, Yasgur D, Anderson DT, Hajner ME (2002) In vivo comparison of femorotibial contact positions for press fit posterior stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 17:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M (2003) In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop 410:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pottmann H, Wallner J (2001) Computational line geometry. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Pottmann H, Peternell M, Ravani B (1999) An introduction to line geometry with applications. Comput Aided Des 31:3–16

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Scarvell JM, Smith PN, Refshauge KM, Galloway HR, Woods KR (2004) Evaluation of a method to map tibiofemoral contact points in the normal knee using MRI. J Orthop Res 22:788–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai LW (1999) Robot analysis: the mechanics of serial and parallel manipulators. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Siebert M, Bringmann C, Vogl T, Englmeier KH, Graichen H (2004) A new in vivo technique for determination of 3D kinematics and contact areas of the patello-femoral and tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 37:927–934ssss

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson DR, Apreleva MV, Eichler MJ, Harrold FR (2003) Accuracy and repeatability of the pressure measurement system in the patellofemoral joint. J Biomech 36:1909–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wismans J, Veldpaus F, Janssen J (1980) A three-dimensional mathematical model of the knee-joint. J Biomech 13:677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of the United States under NSF ITR Grant No. 0325920.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alon Wolf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolf, A., Jaramaz, B. & Murtha, P.E. Fully automated computer algorithm for calculating articular contact points with application to knee biomechanics. Med Biol Eng Comput 46, 233–240 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0297-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0297-4

Keywords

Navigation