Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The use of microbubbles in Doppler ultrasound studies

  • Special Issue - Review
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are widely used in Doppler studies, either for simple echo enhancement purposes, or to increase the low signal-to-clutter ratio typical of microcirculation investigations. Common to all Doppler techniques, which are briefly reviewed in this paper, is the basic assumption that possible phase and amplitude changes in received echoes are only associated with UCA microbubble movements due to the drag force of blood. Actually, when UCAs are insonified, phenomena such as rupture, displacement due to radiation force, and acoustically driven deflation might influence the results of Doppler investigations. In this paper, we investigate the possible Doppler effects of such phenomena by means of a numerical simulation model and a special acousto-optical set-up which allows analysis of the behavior of individual microbubbles over relatively long time intervals. It is thus found that all phenomena produce evident Doppler effects in vitro, but that bubble displacement and deflation in particular, are not expected to significantly interfere with clinical measurements in standard conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auton TR, Hunt JCR, Prud’homme M (1988) The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow. J Fluid Mech 197:241–257. doi:10.1017/S0022112088003246

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Becher H, Schlief R (1989) Improved sensitivity of color Doppler by SH U 454. Am J Cardiol 64:374–377. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(89)90538-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bevan PD, Karshafian R, Tickkner EG, Burns PN (2007) Quantitative measurement of ultrasound disruption of polymer-shelled microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 33(11):1777–1786. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bjerknes V (1906) Fields of force. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bleeker H, Shung K, Barnhart J (1990) On the application of ultrasonic contrast agents for blood flowmetry and assessment of cardiac perfusion. J Ultrasound Med 9:461–471

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bloch SH, Wan MD, Ferrara KA (2004) Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents. Appl Phys Lett 84(4):631–633. doi:10.1063/1.1643544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Borden MA, Longo ML (2002) Dissolution behavior of lipid monolayer-coated, air-filled microbubbles: effect of lipid hydrophobic chain length. Langmuir 18:9225–9233. doi:10.1021/la026082h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Borden MA, Kruse DE, Caskey CF, Zhao S, Dayton PA, Ferrara KW (2005) Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 52(11):1992–2002. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1561668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouakaz A, Versluis M, de Jong N (2005) High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. Ultrasound Med Biol 31(3):391–399. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennen CE (1995) Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce MF, Averkiou MA, Skyba D, Powers JE (2000) A generalization of pulse inversion Doppler. Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp 2:1903–1906

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bruce MF, Averkiou MA, Tiemann K, Lohmaier S, Powers J, Beach K (2004) Vascular flow and perfusion imaging with ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 30(6):735–743. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Burns PN, Powers JE, Hope Simpson D et al (1993) Harmonic contrast-enhanced Doppler as a method for the elimination of clutter: in vivo duplex and color studies. Radiology 189:285

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burns PN, Powers JE, Simpson DH, Brezina A, Kolin A, Chin CT et al (1994) Harmonic power mode Doppler using microbubble contrast agents: an improved method for small vessel flow imaging. Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp 3(1–4):1547–1550

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chomas JE, Dayton P, May D, Ferrara KW (2001) Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. J Biomed Opt 6(2):141–150. doi:10.1117/1.1352752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chomas JE, Dayton P, Allen J, Morgan K, Ferrara KW (2001) Mechanism of contrast agent destruction. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 48(1):232–248. doi:10.1109/58.896136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Church CC (1995) The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 97(3):1510–1521. doi:10.1121/1.412091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dayton PA, Morgan KE, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger GH, Ferrara KW (1999) Optical and acoustical observation of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 46(1):220–232. doi:10.1109/58.741536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dayton PA, Allen JS, Ferrara KW (2002) The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast Agents. J Acoust Soc Am 112:2183–2192. doi:10.1121/1.1509428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Jong N (1993) Acoustic properties of ultrasound contrast agents. PhD Dissertation, de Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam

  21. de Jong M, Emmer C, Chin A (2007) “Compression-only” behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 33(4):653–656. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Vries J, Luther S, Lohse D (2002) Induced bubble shape oscillations and their impact on the rise velocity. Eur Phys J B Cond Matt 29(3):503–509. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2002-00332-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Di Marco P, Grassi W (2003) Experimental study on rising velocity of nitrogen bubbles in FC-72. Int J Therm Sci 42:435–446. doi:10.1016/S1290-0729(02)00044-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Doinikov AA (1998) Acoustic radiation force on a bubble: viscous and thermal effects. J Acoust Soc Am 103(1):143–147. doi:10.1121/1.421113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Doinikov AA, Dayton PA (2007) Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am 121(6):3331–3340. doi:10.1121/1.2722233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Drew DA, Lathey RT Jr (1990) Some supplemental analysis concerning the virtual mass and lift force on a sphere in a rotating and straining flow. Int J Multiph Flow 16:1127–1130. doi:10.1016/0301-9322(90)90110-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duck FA (1990) Physical properties of tissue. Academic press, London. Chapter 5

  28. Eller A (1968) Force on a bubble in a standing acoustic wave. J Acoust Soc Am 43(1):170–171. doi:10.1121/1.1910755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Emmer M, van Wamel A, Goertz DE, de Jong M (2007) The onset of microbubble vibration. Ultrasound Med Biol 33(6):941–949. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Evans DH, McDicken WN (2000) Doppler ultrasound. Physics, instrumentation, and signal processing, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  31. Feinstein SB (2006) Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(2):236–243. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fyrillas MM, Szeri A (1994) Dissolution or growth of soluble spherical oscillating bubbles. J Fluid Mech 277:381–407. doi:10.1017/S0022112094002806

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Gerriets T, Seidel G, Fiss I, Modrau B, Kaps M (1999) Contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded duplex sonography: efficiency and validity. Neurology 52(6):1133–1137

    Google Scholar 

  34. Goertz DE, Frijlink ME, Tempel D, Bhagwandas V, Gisolf A, Krams R et al (2007) Subharmonic contrast intravascular ultrasound for vasa vasorum imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 33(12):1859–1872. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.05.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Goldberg BB, Liu JB, Burns PN, Merton PA, Forsberg F (1993) Galactose-based intravenous sonographic contrast agent: experimental studies. J Ultrasound Med 12(8):463–470

    Google Scholar 

  36. Goldberg BB, Raichlen JS, Forsberg F (2001) Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles and clinical applications. 2 Sub edition. Informa Healthcare, London, pp 21–30

  37. Guidi F, Vos H J, Tortoli P, de Jong N (2006) Simultaneous optical and acoustical observation of microbubbles behaviour. IEEE Ultrason Symp, 1358–1361

  38. Hilgenfeldt S, Lohse D, Brenner MP (1996) Phase diagrams for luminescing bubbles. Phys Fluids 8(11):2808–2826. doi:10.1063/1.869131

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoff L, Sontum PC, Hovem JM (2000) Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell. J Acoust Soc Am 107(4):2272–2280. doi:10.1121/1.428557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hope Simpson D, Chin CT, Burns PN (1999) Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 46:372–382. doi:10.1109/58.753026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnson VE, Hsieh T (1966) The influence in trajectories of gas nuclei on cavitation inception. 6th Naval Hydrodynamics Symposium, pp 163–182

  42. Kasai C, Namekawa K, Koyano A, Omoto R (1985) Real-time two-dimensional blood flow imaging using an autocorrelation technique. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason 32(3):458–464

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kaul S (1995) Myocardial contrast echocardiography in coronary artery disease: potential applications using venous injections of contrast. Am J Cardiol 75:61–68. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80529-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kern R, Perren F, Schoeneberger K, Gass A, Hennerici M, Meairs S (2004) Ultrasound microbubble destruction imaging in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke 35:1665–1670. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000129332.10721.7e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kono Y, Moriyasu F, Yamada K et al (1996) Conventional and harmonic gray scale enhancement of the liver with sonication activation of a US contrast agent. Radiology 201(P):266

    Google Scholar 

  46. Leighton TG (1994) The acoustic bubble. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  47. Leighton TG, Ramble DG, Phelps AD (1997) The detection of tethered and rising bubbles using multiple acoustic techniques. J Acoust Soc Am 101:2626–2635. doi:10.1121/1.418503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Levine RA, Teichholz LE, Goldman ME, Steinmetz MY, Baker M, Meltzer RS (1984) Microbubbles have intracardiac velocities similar to those of red blood cells. J Am Coll Cardiol 3:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Magnaudet J, Legendre D (1998) The viscous drag force on a spherical bubble with a time-dependent radius. Phys Fluids 10:550–554. doi:10.1063/1.869582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Marmottant P, van der Meer SM, Emmer M, Versluis M, de Jong N, Hilgenfeldt S et al (2005) A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture. J Acoust Soc Am 118(6):3499–3505. doi:10.1121/1.2109427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Matula TJ (2003) Bubble lievitation and translation under single-bubble sonoluminescence conditions. J Acoust Soc Am 114(2):775–781. doi:10.1121/1.1589753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Meyer RS, Billet ML, Holl JW (1992) Freestream nuclei and travelling bubble-cavitation. J Fluids Eng 114:672–679. doi:10.1115/1.2910084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nanda NC, Schlief R, Goldberg BB (1997) Advances in echo imaging using contrast enhancement. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dubai Part two: 207–479, Part Three: 491–627

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ophir J, Parker KJ (1989) Contrast agents in diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 15(4):319–333. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(89)90044-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Panton R (1984) Incompressible flow. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Phillips P (2001) Contrast pulse sequences (CPS): imaging nonlinear microbubbles. Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp 2:1739–1745

    Google Scholar 

  57. Postema M, Marmottant P, Lancée CT, Hilgenfeldt S, de Jong N (2004) Ultrasound-induced microbubble coalescence. Ultrasound Med Biol 30(10):1337–1344. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pu G, Longo ML, Borden MA (2005) Effects of microstructure on molecular oxygen permeation through condensed phospolipid monolayer. J Am Chem Soc 127:6524–6525. doi:10.1021/ja051103q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pu G, Borden MA, Longo ML (2006) Collapse and shedding transition in binary lipid monolayer. Langmuir 22:2993–2999. doi:10.1021/la0530337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rychak JJ, Klibanov AL, Hossak JA (2005) Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles in vitro verification. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 52(3):421–433. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1417264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Stride E, Saffari N (2003) Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Proc Part H 217(H6):429–447. doi:10.1243/09544110360729072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Takeuchi Y (1997) Industrial use thermoplastic microballoon to mimic the contrast agents and its in-vivo behavior including released gas dynamics. Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp 2:1579–1582

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tiemann K, Lohmeier S, Kuntz S et al (1999) Real-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: first experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging. Echocardiography 16:799–809. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8175.1999.tb00132.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tienmann K, Pohl C, Schlosser T, Goenechea J, Bruce M, Veltmann C et al (2000) Stimulated acoustic emission: pseudo-Doppler shifts seen during the destruction of nonmoving microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 26(7):1161–1167. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00261-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tortoli P, Pratesi M, Michelassi V (2000) Doppler spectra from contrast agents crossing an ultrasound field. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 47:716–726. doi:10.1109/58.842061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tortoli P, Michelassi V, Corsi M, Righi D, Takeuchi Y (2001) On the interaction between ultrasound and contrast agents during Doppler investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol 27(9):1265–1273. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00426-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tortoli P, Corsi M, Boni E, Arditi M, Frinking PJA (2005) Different effects of microbubble destruction and translation in Doppler measurements. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 52(7):1183–1188. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1504005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Vokurka K (1986) Comparison of Rayleigh’s, Herring’s, and Gilmore’s models of a gas bubbles. Acustica 59:214

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Vos HJ, Guidi F, Boni E, Tortoli P (2007) Method for microbubble characterization using primary radiation force. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 54(7):1333–1345. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2007.393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Watanabe T, Kukita Y (1993) Translational and radial motions of a bubble in an acoustic standing wave field. Phys Fluids A 5:2682–2688. doi:10.1063/1.858731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. White FM (1991) Viscous fluid flow, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Electronic and Telecommunications Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Piero Tortoli, Francesco Guidi & Riccardo Mori

  2. Biomedical Engineering, Thorax Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Hendrik J. Vos

Authors
  1. Piero Tortoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Guidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Riccardo Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hendrik J. Vos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piero Tortoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tortoli, P., Guidi, F., Mori, R. et al. The use of microbubbles in Doppler ultrasound studies. Med Biol Eng Comput 47, 827–838 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0423-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0423-y

Keywords