Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The optimal linear transformation-based fMRI feature space analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a method of extending the optimal linear transformation (OLT), an image analysis technique of feature space, from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) so as to improve the activation detection performance over conventional approaches of fMRI analysis. The method was: (1) ideal hemodynamic responses for different stimuli were generated by convolving the theoretical hemodynamic response model with the stimulus timing, (2) considering the ideal hemodynamic responses as hypothetical signature vectors for different activity patterns of interest, OLT was used to extract the features of fMRI data. The resultant feature space had particular geometric clustering properties. It was then classified into different groups, each pertaining to an activity pattern of interest; the applied signature vector for each group was obtained by averaging, (3) using the applied signature vectors, OLT was applied again to generate fMRI composite images with high SNRs for the desired activity patterns. Simulations and a blocked fMRI experiment were employed to validate the proposed method. The simulation and the experiment results indicated the proposed method was capable of improving some conventional methods to be more sensitive to activations, having strong contrast between activations and inactivations, and being more valid for complex activity patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burke D, Murphy K, Garavan H, Reilly R (2004) Pattern recognition approach to the detection of single-trial event-related functional magnetic resonance images. Med Biol Eng Comput 42(5):604–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuang K-H, Chiu M-J, Lin C-C, Chen J-H (1999) Model-free functional MRI analysis using Kohonen clustering neural network and fuzzy C-means. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(12):1117–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Çiftçi K, Sankur B, Kahya YP, Akın A (2008) Constraining the general linear model for sensible hemodynamic response function waveforms. Med Biol Eng Comput 46(8):779–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen MS (1997) Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear systems methods. Neuroimage 6(2):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox RW (1996) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29(3):162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Maziere PA, van Hulle MM (2007) fMRI bold signal analysis using a novel nonparametric statistical method. J Magn Reson 185(1):138–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimitriadou E, Barth M, Windischberger C, Hornik K, Moser E (2004) A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis. Artif Intell Med 31(1):57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JB, Frith C, Frackowiak RSJ (1995) Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2:189–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friston KJ, Stephan KE, Lund TE, Morcom A, Kiebel SJ (2005) Mixed-effects and fMRI studies. Neuroimage 24:244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao J (2003) Iterative temporal clustering analysis for the detection of multiple response peaks in fMRI. Magn Reson Imaging 21(1):51–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glover GH (1999) Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 9:416–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goutte C, Hansen LK, Liptrot MG, Rostrup E (2001) Feature-space clustering for fMRI meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 13:165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hellera R, Stanleyb D, Yekutielia D, Rubinb N, Benjaminia Y (2006) Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data. Neuroimage 33(2):599–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnan K, Atkins MS (1998) Segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in MRI—an image analysis approach. Proc SPIE Int Symp Med 3338:1106–1116

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lai S-H, Fang M (1998) Novel local PCA-based method for detecting activation signals in fMRI. Proc SPIE 3337:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lange O, Meyer-Baese A, Hurdal M, Foo S (2006) A comparison between neural and fuzzy cluster analysis techniques for functional MRI. Biomed Signal Process Control 1(3):243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McKeown MJ, Sejnowski TJ (1998) Independent component analysis of fMRI data: examining the assumptions. Hum Brain Mapp 6(5–6):368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyer FG, Chinrungrueng J (2003) Features selection for clustering of fMRI data. Proc SPIE 5207:426–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patriarche JW, Erickson B (2007) Part 1. Automated change detection and characterizations in serial MR studies of brain-tumor patients. J Digital Imaging 20(3):203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pham DL, Xu C, Prince JL (2000) Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2:315–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salih QA, Ramli AR, Mahmud R, Wirza R (2005) Brain white and gray matter anatomy of MRI segmentation based on tissue evaluation. Medscape Gen Med 7(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soltanian-Zadeh H, Windham JP, Peck DJ, Yagle AE (1992) A comparative analysis of several transformations for enhancement and segmentation of magnetic resonance image scene sequence. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 11(3):302–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Soltanian-Zadeh H, Windham JP, Peck DJ (1996) Optimal linear transformation for MRI feature extraction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15(6):749–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Soltanian-Zadeh H, Peck DJ, Hearshen DO, Lajiness-O’Neill RR (2004) Model-independent method for fMRI analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(3):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang C-M, Chen C-C, Chung Y-N et al (2003) Detection of spectral signatures in multispectral MR images for classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(1):50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Worsley KJ, Marrett S, Neelin P, Vandal AC, Friston KJ, Evans AC (1996) A unified statistical approach or determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum Brain Mapp 4:58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Worsley KJ, Liao CH, Aston J, Petre V, Duncan GH, Morales F, Evans AC (2002) A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. Neuroimage 15:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Margot J. Taylor for her contributions to this paper. This work was partly supported by the Outstanding Young Scientist Foundation of Shandong Province under the Grant 2005BS01006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Babyn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, F., Morris, D. & Babyn, P. The optimal linear transformation-based fMRI feature space analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 47, 1119–1129 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0504-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0504-6

Keywords

Navigation