Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dose-guided radiotherapy for lung tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transit in vivo dosimetry performed by an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) is a very practical method to check error sources in radiotherapy. Recently, the present authors have developed an in vivo dosimetry method based on correlation functions, F (w, L), defined as the ratio between the transit signal, S t (w, L), by the EPID and the mid-plane dose, D m (w, L), in a solid water phantom as a function of the phantom thickness, w, and of the field dimensions, L. In particular, generalized correlation functions F (w, L) for 6, 10 and 15 MV X-ray beams supplied by a pilot Varian linac, are here used by other three linacs operating in two centers. This way the workload, due to measurements in solid water phantom, needed to implement the in vivo dosimetry method was avoided. This article reports a feasibility study on the potentiality of this procedure for the adaptive radiotherapy of lung tumors treated by 3D conformal radiotherapy techniques. In particular, the dose reconstruction at the isocenter point D iso in the lung tumor has been used as dose-guided radiotherapy (DGRT), to detect the inter-fraction tumor anatomy variations that can require new CT scans and an adaptive plan. When a difference greater than 6% between the predicted dose by the treatment planning system (TPS), D iso,TPS and the D iso was observed, the clinical action started to detect possible anatomical lung tumor changes. Twelve over twenty patients examined presented in vivo dose discrepancies due to the tumor morphological changes during treatments, and these results were successively confirmed by new CT scans. In this work, for a patient that showed for all beams, D iso values over the tolerance level, the new CT scan was used for an adaptive plan. The lung dose volume histogram for D iso,TPS = 2 Gy per fraction suggested the adaptive plan. In particular, the lung volume included in 2 Gy increased from 350 cm3 of the original plan to 550 cm3 of the hybrid plan, while for the adaptive plan the lung volume included in 2 Gy decreased to 15 cm3. Moreover, the mean doses to the organs at risk were reduced to 70%. The results of this research show that the DGRT procedure by the D iso reconstruction, integrated with radiological imaging, was feasible for periodic investigation on morphological lung tumor changes. This feasibility study takes into account the accuracy of two algorithms based on the pencil beam and collapsed cone convolution models for dose calculations where large density inhomogeneities are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BJR (1996) Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy. British Institute of Radiology, London, supplement 25

  2. De Jaeger K, Hoogeman MS, Engelsman M, Seppenwoolde Y, Damen EMF, Mijnheer BJ, Boersma LJ, Lebesque JV (2003) Incorporating an improved dose-calculation algorithm in conformal radiotherapy of lung cancer: re-evaluation of dose in normal lung tissue. Radiother Oncol 69:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erridge SC, Seppenwoolde Y, Muller SH et al (2003) Portal imaging to assess set-up errors, tumor motion, and tumor shrinkage during conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 66:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fidanzio A, Mameli A, Placidi E, Greco F, Stimato G, Gaudino D, Ramella S, D’Angelillo R, Cellini F, Trodella L, Cilla S, Grimaldi L, D’Onofrio G, Azario L, Piermattei A (2008) EPID cine acquisition mode for in vivo dosimetry in dynamic arc radiation therapy. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res B 266:658–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grimaldi L, D’Onofrio G, Cilla S, Fidanzio A, Stimato G, Azario L, Deodato F, Macchia G, Morganti A, Piermattei A (2007) Breast in vivo dosimetry by a portal ionization chamber. Med Phys 34:1121–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hasenbalg F, Neuenschwander H, Mini R, Born EJ (2007) Collapsed cone and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases. J Phys 74:3679–3691

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hugo GD, Yan D, Liang J (2007) Population and patient-specific target margins for 4D adaptive radiotherapy to account for intra- and inter-fraction variation in lung tumor position. Phys Med Biol 52:257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2004) Absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Technical reports series No. 398. IAEA, Vienna

  9. ICRU Report 62 (1990) Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU Report 50). ICRU, Bethesda

  10. Kavuma A, Glegg M, Currie G, Elliott A (2008) Assessment of dosimetrical performance in 11 Varian a-Si-500 electronic portal imaging devices. Phys Med Biol 53:6893–6900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krieger T, Sauer OA (2005) Monte Carlo versus pencil beam/collapsed cone dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom. Phys Med Biol 50:859–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kupelian PA, Ramsey C, Meeks SL, Willoughby TR, Forbes A, Wagner TH, Langen KM (2005) Serial megavoltage CT imaging during external beam radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: observations on tumor regression during treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:1024–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martel MK, Ten Haken RK, Hazuka MB, Kessler ML, Strawderman M, Turrisi AT, Lawrence TS, Fraass BA, Lichter AS (1999) Estimation of tumor control probability model parameters from 3-D dose distributions of non small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 24:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mijnheer B (2008) State of the art of in vivo dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 131:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morganti AG, Deodato F, Zizzari S, Cilla S, Digesù C, Macchia G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Piermattei A, Cellini N, Valentini V (2009) Complexity index (COMIX) and not type of treatment predicts undetected errors in radiotherapy planning and delivery. Radiother Oncol 89:320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nijsten SM, Mijnheer BJ, Dekker AL, Lambin P, Minken AWH (2007) Routine individualised patient dosimetry using electronic portal imaging devices. Radiother Oncol 83:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Piermattei A, Fidanzio A, Stimato G, Azario L, Grimaldi L, D’Onofrio G, Cilla S (2006) In vivo dosimetry by an aSi-based EPID. Med Phys 33:4414–4422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Piermattei A, Fidanzio A, Azario L et al (2007) Application of a practical method for the isocenter point in vivo dosimetry by a transit signal. Phys Med Biol 52:5101–5117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Piermattei A, Fidanzio A, Azario L, Greco F et al (2009) In patient dose reconstruction using cine acquisition for dynamic arc radiation therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:425–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Piermattei A, Cilla S, Grimaldi L, Viola P, Frattarolo L, D’Onofrio G et al (2008) Real time dosimetry reconstruction for the breath hold radiotherapy technique: an initial experience. Acta Oncologica 47:1414–1421

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ramsey C, Mahan S, Scaperoth D, Chase D (2004) Image-guided adaptive therapy for the treatment of lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:S339

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ramsey CR, Langen KM, Kupelian PA, Scaperoth DD, Meeks SL, Mahan SL, Seibert RM (2006) A technique for adaptive image-guided helical tomotherapy for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64:1237–1244

    Google Scholar 

  23. Siebers JV, Kim JO, Ko L, Keall PJ, Mohan R (2004) Monte Carlo computation of dosimetric amorphous silicon electronic portal images. Med Phys 31(7):2135–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Siker ML, Tomè WA, Mehta MP (2006) Tumor volume changes on serial imaging with megavoltage CT for non-small-cell lung cancer during intensity-modulated radiotherapy: how reliable, consistent and meaningful is the effect? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  25. SSI (2000) The Swedish Radiation Protection Institute’s regulations on radiation therapy. SSTFS, Swedish Radiation Protection Authority, Stockholm

  26. van Elmpt W, McDermott L, Nijsten S, Wendling M, Lambin P, Mijnheer B (2008) A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 88:289–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Esch A, Depuydt T, Huyskens DP (2004) The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields. Radiother Oncol 71:223–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Varian MS. PortalVision™ aS500 (2000) Rel. 6. Reference manual

  29. Yartsev S, Dar AR, Woodford C, Wong E, Bauman G, Van Dyk J (2007) Initial experience in treating lung cancer with helical tomotherapy. Biomed Imaging Interv J 3(1):e2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Nucletron, (Italy) for their technical assistance. This work was financially supported by the B-MIUR Project no 4210011 ‘Sviluppo di nuovi approcci terapeutici al problema clinico della resistenza alla chemioterapia antitumorale’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelo Piermattei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piermattei, A., Fidanzio, A., Cilla, S. et al. Dose-guided radiotherapy for lung tumors. Med Biol Eng Comput 48, 79–86 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0558-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0558-5

Keywords

Navigation