Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of the complex countermovement jumping by means of a simple four-degrees-of-freedom model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By means of a four-degrees-of-freedom model the vertical movements of an athlete and the time course of the ground reaction force were simulated during a countermovement jump on a concrete and a wooden surface. The model masses were connected to each other and to the surface by springs and dampers. At first the stiffness of the springs decreased in order to initiate the countermovement. Afterwards the stiffness increased like the muscle activity so that the flexion of the model ‘legs’ were decelerated before the extension starts. The best result was attained when the stiffness of the spring between the model masses ‘thighs’ and ‘trunk’ increased before the other three springs. Compared with the muscle activity this means that for a successful jump the upper body segments have to be accelerated before the segments near to the ground are accelerated. The model ‘athlete’ was connected to a model of the surface. It could be shown that the jump on a concrete surface results in a better jump height than the jump on an elastic wooden surface if the muscle activation is not adapted to the surface properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson FC, Pandy MG (1993) Storage and utilization of elastic strain-energy during jumping. J Biomech 26:1413–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bobbert MF, van Ingen Schenau GJ (1988) Coordination in vertical jumping. J Biomech 21:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bobbert MF, Gerritsen KGM, Litjens MCA, van Soest AJ (1996) Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height? Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:1402–1412

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fritz M, Peikenkamp K (2001) Simulating the impact during human jumping by means of a four degrees-of-freedom model with time dependent properties. J Mot Behav 33:286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fritz M, Peikenkamp K (2003) Simulation of the influence of sports surfaces on vertical ground reaction forces during landing. Med Biol Eng Comput 41:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fukashiro S, Besier TF, Barrett R, Cochrane J, Nagano A, Lloyd DG (2005) Direction control in standing horizontal and vertical jumps. Int J Sport Health Sci 3:272–279

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gollhofer A, Strojnik V, Rapp W, Schweizer L (1992) Behaviour of triceps surae muscle-tendon complex in different jump conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol 64:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hochmuth G (1982) Biomechanik sportlicher Bewegungen. Sportverlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horita T, Ishiko T (1987) Relationship between muscle lactate accumulation and surface EMG activities during isokinetic contractions in man. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jöllenbeck T (2000) Methodological limitations of EMG-based biomechanical motion analysis. In: Hong Y, Johns DP (eds) Proceedings of the XVIII international symposium on biomechanics in sports, vol II, Hong Kong, pp 769–772

  11. Kibele A (2001) Unbewusste Informationsverarbeitung–Ein Thema für die Sportwissenschaft?!. Peter Lang, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  12. Komor A, Morawski J, Pruski L (1981) Control systems analysis of the take-off phase of vertical jump. In: Morecki A, Fidelius K, Kedzior K, Wit A (eds) Biomechanics VII-B, international series on biomechanics, vol 3B. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 257–263

  13. Kurokawa S, Fukunaga T, Nagano A, Fukashori S (2003) Interaction between fascicles and tendinous structures during counter movement jumping investigated in vivo. J Appl Physiol 95:2306–2314

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nagano A, Komura T, Fukashiro S, Himeno R (2005) Force, work and power output of lower limb muscles during human maximal-effort countermovement jumping. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 15:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pandy MG, Zajac FE, Sim E, Levine WS (1990) An optimal-control model for maximum-height human jumping. J Biomech 23:1185–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Soest AJ, Schwab AL, Bobbert MF, van Ingen Schenau GJ (1993) The influence of the biarticularity of the gastrocnemius muscle on vertical jumping achievement. J Biomech 26:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Fritz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fritz, M., Peikenkamp, K. Simulation of the complex countermovement jumping by means of a simple four-degrees-of-freedom model. Med Biol Eng Comput 48, 361–370 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0585-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0585-2

Keywords

Navigation