Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental validation of quasi-one-dimensional and two-dimensional steady glottal flow models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical modelling of phonation requires a mechanical description of the vocal fold coupled to a description of the flow within the glottis. In this study, an in-vitro set-up, allowing to reproduce flow conditions comparable to those of human glottal flow is used to systematically verify and discuss the relevance of the pressure and flow-rate predictions of several laminar flow models. The obtained results show that all the considered flow models underestimate the measured flow-rates and that flow-rates predicted with the one-dimensional model are most accurate. On the contrary, flow models based on boundary-layer theory and on the two-dimensional numerical resolution of Navier–Stokes equations yield most accurate pressure predictions. The influence of flow separation on the predictions is discussed since these two models can estimate relevant flow separation positions whereas this phenomenon is treated in a simplified ad-hoc way in the one-dimensional flow modelling. Laminar flow models appear to be unsuitable to describe the flow downstream of the glottal constriction. Therefore, the use of flow models taking into account three-dimensional effects as well as turbulence is motivated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ADINA (2006) Theory and modeling guide, vol III: ADINA CFD & FSI. ADINA R&D, Inc., Watertown

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alipour F, Titze IR (1996) Combined simulations of two-dimensional airflow and vocal fold vibration. In: Davis PJ, Fletcher NH (eds) Vocal fold physiology: controlling complexity and Chaos. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, pp 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cisonni J, Van Hirtum A, Pelorson X, Willems J (2008) Theoretical simulation and experimental validation of inverse quasi one-dimensional steady and unsteady glottal flow models. J Acoust Soc Am 124(1):535–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Oliveira Rosa M, Pereira J (2007) Aerodynamic study of three-dimensional larynx models using finite element methods. J Sound and Vib 311:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Vries M, Schutte H, Verkerke G (1999) Determination of parameters for lumped parameter models of the vocal folds using a finite-element method approach. J Acoust Soc Am 106(6):3620–3628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Vries M, Schutte H, Veldman A, Verkerke G (2002) Glottal flow through a two-mass model: comparison of Navier-Stokes solutions with simplified models. J Acoust Soc Am 111(4):1847–1853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Decker G, Thomson S (2007) Computational simulations of vocal fold vibration: Bernoulli versus Navier-Stokes. J Voice 21:273–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deverge M, Pelorson X, Vilain C, Lagree P, Chentouf F, Willems J, Hirschberg A (2003) Influence of collision on the flow through in-vitro rigid models of the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 114(6):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirano M, Kurita S, Nakashima T (1983) Growth, development and aging of human vocal folds. In: Bless D, Abbs J (eds) Vocal fold physiology. College Hill Press, San Diego, pp 22–43

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horacek J, Svec J (2002) Aeroelastic model of vocal-fold-shaped vibrating element for studying the phonation threshold. J Fluids Struct 16(7):931–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishizaka K, Flanagan J (1972) Synthesis of voiced sounds from a two-mass model of the vocal cords. Bell Syst Tech J 51:1233–1267

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kacha A, Bettens F, Grenez F (2006) Vocal dysperiodicities estimation by means of adaptive long-term prediction. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:61–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lagrée P, Lorthois S (2005) The RNS/Prandtl equations and their link with other asymptotic descriptions. Application to the computation of the maximum value of the wall shear stress in a pipe. Int J Eng Sci 43:352–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lous N, Hofmans G, Veldhuis N, Hirschberg A (1998) A symmetrical two-mass vocal-fold model coupled to vocal tract and trachea, with application to prosthesis design. Acta Acustica 84:1135–1150

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luo X, Pedley T (2000) Flow limitation and multiple solutions in 2-D collapsible channel flow. J Fluid Mech 420:301–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo X, Calderhead B, Liu H, Li W (2007) On the initial configurations of collapsible tube flow. Comput Struct 85(2):977–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitev P, Hadjitodorov S (2000) A method for turbulent noise estimation in voiced signals. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:625–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelorson X, Hirschberg A, Van Hasselt R, Wijnands A, Auregan Y (1994) Theoretical and experimental study of quasisteady-flow separation within the glottis during phonation. Application to a modified two-mass model. J Acoust Soc Am 96(6):3416–3431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pelorson X, Liljencrants J, Kroeger B (1995) On the aero-acoustics of voiced sound production. In: Proceedings 15th international conference on acoustics. Trondheim, Norway

  20. Ruty N, Pelorson X, Van Hirtum A, Lopez I, Hirschberg A (2007) An in-vitro setup to test the relevance and the accuracy of low-order vocal folds models. J Acoust Soc Am 121(1), 479–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schlichting H, Gersten K (2000) Boundary layer theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thomson S, Mongeau L, Frankel S (2005) Aerodynamic transfer of energy to the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 118(3):1689–1700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomson SL, Mongeau L, Frankel SH (2007) Flow over a membrane-covered, fluid-filled cavity. Comput Struct 85:1012–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Titze IR (1994) Principles of voice production. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  25. Titze IR (2002) Regulating glottal airflow in phonation: application of the maximum power transfer theorem to a low dimensional phonation model. J Acoust Soc Am 111:367–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Hirtum A, Pelorson X, Lagrée PY (2005) In vitro validation of some flow assumptions for the prediction of the pressure distribution during obstructive sleep apnoea. Med Biol Eng Comput 43:162–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vilain C, Pelorson X, Fraysse C, Deverge M, Hirschberg A, Willems J (2004) Experimental validation of a quasi-steady theory for the flow through the glottis. J Sound Vib 276(3–5):475–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. White F (1982) Viscous fluid flow. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been supported by Ph.D. grant from the French Ministry of Education and Research, Explora’Doc scholarship from Rhône-Alpes regional council (France), grant EGIDE Alliance 18224YD and grant ANR-07-JCJC-0055.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Cisonni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cisonni, J., Van Hirtum, A., Luo, X.Y. et al. Experimental validation of quasi-one-dimensional and two-dimensional steady glottal flow models. Med Biol Eng Comput 48, 903–910 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0645-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0645-7

Keywords

Navigation