Abstract
Fusionless growth-sparing implants for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) attempt to manipulate vertebral growth to restore spinal alignment. This study critically explores different implants utilizing a human spine scoliotic finite element model (FEM). Stainless steel (SS) and shape memory alloy (SMA) staples and flexible tethers were modeled and alternatively integrated around the apex of the convexity of the scoliotic model. Stress profiles over vertebral growth plates were obtained. Two years of growth was simulated with non-instrumented and instrumented models, as curvature changes were quantified. Apical asymmetrical stresses in non-instrumented and instrumented scoliotic models with SS staple, flexible tether, and SMA staple were 0.48, 0.48, 0.23, and 0.33 MPa, respectively. Patient data and non-instrumented model progressed from 28° to 62° of thoracic Cobb angle over 2 years. Simulated projected long-term thoracic Cobb angles of instrumented models are 31° with SS staple, 31° with flexible tether, and 34° with SMA staple. Initial implant compression achieved during instrumentation provided a significant influence on initial and long-term spinal profiles. The developed FEM provides an effective platform with which to explore, critique, and enhance fusionless growth-sparing techniques.






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams M, Hutton W (1980) The effect of posture on the role of the apophysial joints in resisting intervertebral compressive forces. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62(3):358–362
Betz R, Andrea L, Mulcahey M, Chafetz R (2005) Vertebral body stapling procedure for the treatment of scoliosis in the growing child. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:55–60
Braun J, Akyuz E, Ogilvie J, Bachus K (2005) The efficacy and integrity of shape memory alloy staples and bone anchors with ligament tethers in the fusionless treatment of experimental scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):2038–2051
Braun J, Hunt K, Sorenson S, Ogilvie J (2007) Can fusionless scoliosis surgery reverse the Hueter-Volmann effect? In: 42nd annual meeting scoliosis research society, Edinburg, Scotland
Charles Y, Daures J, de Rosa V, Dimeglio A (2006) Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth. Spine 31(17):1933–1942
Delorme S, Petit Y, de Guise J, Aubin CE, Dansereau J (2003) Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50(8):989–998
Dolan L, Weinstein S (2007) Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an evidence-based review. Spine 32(19S):91–100
Driscoll M, Aubin CE, Moreau A, Villemure I, Parent S (2009) The role of concave–convex biases in the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18:180–187
Edwards T, Zheng Y, Ferrara L, Yuan H (2001) Structural features and thickness of the vertebral cortex in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 26(2):218–225
Hunt H, Braun J, Christensen B (2007) The effect of two clinically relevant fusionless scoliosis implant strategies on the health of the intervertebral disc. In: 42nd Annual meeting scoliosis research society, Edinburgh, Scotland
Huynh AM, Aubin CE, Mathieu P, Labelle H (2007) Simulation of progressive spinal deformities in Duchenne muscular dystrophy using a biomechanical model integrating muscle and vertebral growth modulation. Clin Biomech 22:392–399
Huynh AM, Aubin CE, Rajwani T, Bagnall K, Villemure I (2007) Pedicle growth asymmetry as a cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 16:523–529
Lalonde N, Villemure I, Pannetier R, Parent S, Aubin CE (2010) Biomechanical modeling of the lateral decubitus posture during corrective scoliosis surgery. Clin Biomech 25(6):510–516
Lin H, Aubin CE, Parent S, Villemure I (2009) Mechanobiological bone growth: comparative analysis of two biomechanical modeling approaches. Med Biol Eng Comput 47(4):957–966
Little D, Song K, Katz D, Herring J (2000) Relationship of peak height velocity to other maturity indicators in idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Bone Joint Surg 82(5):685–693
Mehlman C, Araghi A, Roy D (1997) Hyphenated history: the Hueter-Volkmann law. Am J Orthop 26:798–800
Meir A, Fairbank J, Jones D, McNally D, Urban J (2007) High pressures and asymmetrical stresses in the scoliotic disc in the absence of muscle loading. Scoliosis 2:article 4
Mente P, Aronsson D, Stokes I, Iatridis J (1999) Mechanical modulation of growth for the correction of vertebral wedge deformities. J Orthop Res 17:518–524
Moreau A, Franco A, Azedine B, Rompre P, Turgeon I, Bagnall K, Poitras B, Labelle H, Rivard C, Grimard G, Ouellet J, Parent S, Larouche G, Lacroix G (2008) Elevated plasma factor P is involved in AIS onset and curve progression. In: SRS 43rd annual meeting scoliosis research society, Salt Lake City
Moreau A, Wang D, Forget S, Azeddine B, Angeloni D, Fraschini F, Labelle H, Poitras B, Rivard C, Grimard G (2004) Melatonin signaling dysfunction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29(16):1772–1781
Newton P, Farnsworth C, Faro F, Mahar A, Odell T, Mohamad F, Breisch E, Fricka K, Upasani W, Amiel D (2008) Spinal growth modulation with an anterolateral flexible tether in an immature bovine model. Spine 23(7):724–733
Polikeit A, Ferguson S, Nolte L, Orr T (2003) Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 12:413–420
Price J, Oyajobi B, Russell R (1994) The cell biology of bone growth. Eur J Clin Nutr 48(Suppl 1):131–149
Roberts S, Menage J, Urban J (1989) Biochemical and structural properties of the cartilage end-plate and its relation to the intervertebral disc. Spine 14(2):166–174
Sarwark J, Aubin CE (2007) Growth considerations of the immature spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(Suppl 1):8–13
Schmid E, Aubin CE, Moreau A, Sarwark J, Parent S (2008) A novel fusionless vertebral physeal device inducing spinal growth modulation for the correction of spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 17(10):1329–1335
Schultz A, Andersson G, Ortengren R, Nachemson A (1982) Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurement of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. J Bone Joint Surg 64(5):713–720
Shirazi-Adl A, Shivastava S, Ahmed A (1984) Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression: a three dimensional nonlinear finite element study. Spine 9(2):120–134
Stokes I (2007) Analysis and simulation of progressive adolescent scoliosis by biomechanical growth simulation. Eur Spine J 16:1621–1628
Stokes I, Aronsson D, Dimock A, Cortright V, Beck S et al (2006) Endochondral growth in growth plates of three species at two anatomical locations modulated by mechanical compression and tension. J Orthop Res 10:1327–1333
Stokes I, Gardner-Morse M (2004) Muscle activation strategies and symmetry of spinal loading in the lombar spine with scoliosis. Spine 29(19):2103–2107
Stokes I, Spence H, Aronsson D, Kilmer N (1996) Mechanical modulation of vertebral body growth: implications for scoliosis progression. Spine 21:1161–1167
Sylvestre PL, Villemure I, Aubin CE (2007) Finite element modeling of the growth plate in a detailed spine model. Med Biol Eng Comput 45(10):977–988
Tremblay M (2004) Caractérisation expérimentale de la modulation de croissance vertébrale à l’aide d’agrafes à mémoire de forme pour la correction de la scoliose idiopathique: étude de faisabilité. Master thesis, École Polytechnique de Montréal
Villemure I, Aubin CE, Dansereau J (2002) Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth. J Biomed Eng 124:784–790
Villemure I, Aubin CE, Grimard G, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2001) Progression of vertebral and spinal three-dimensional deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal study. Spine 26(20):2244–2250
Wall E, Bylski-Austrow D, Kolata R, Crawford A (2005) Endoscopic mechanical spinal hemiepiphysiodesis modifies spine growth. Spine 30(10):1148–1153
Wilke H, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes L (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24(8):755–762
Acknowledgments
Funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Industrial Research Chair Program with Medtronic of Canada) and the Canada Research Chair Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Driscoll, M., Aubin, CE., Moreau, A. et al. Biomechanical comparison of fusionless growth modulation corrective techniques in pediatric scoliosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 49, 1437–1445 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0801-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0801-8