Skip to main content
Log in

Design of a novel mobility device controlled by the feet motion of a standing child: a feasibility study

  • Special Issue - Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-generated mobility is a major contributor to the physical, emotional, cognitive, and social development of infants and toddlers. When young children have disorders that hinder self locomotion, their development is at risk for delay. Independent mobility via traditional power mobility devices may prevent this delay, but do little to encourage the child’s development of gross motor skills. This research aims to develop a bio-driven mobile-assistive device that is controlled and driven by moving the feet, which may encourage the development of gross motor skills. In this study, system feasibility is shown by experiments on five typically developing toddlers and one special needs toddler with spastic cerebral palsy. Children were placed in the bio-driven device and instructed to navigate through a maze. All subjects were able to successfully complete the maze in multiple trials. In addition, two toddlers showed evidence of improved driving skill by completing the maze in shorter times in successive trials on a given testing day. The results suggest that such a device is feasible for purposeful driving. Recommendations are given for the device and protocol redesign for related future testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal SK, Chen X, Galloway JC (2010) Training special needs infants to drive mobile robots using force-feedback joystick. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

  2. Anderson DI, Campos JJ, Anderson DE, Thomas TD, Witherington DC, Uchiyama I, Barbru-Roth MA (2001) The flip side of perception–action coupling: locomotor experience and the ontogeny of visual–postural coupling. Hum Mov Sci 20(4–5):461–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ARToolKit. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/artoolkit/

  4. Bertenthal B, Campos J (1987) New directions in the study of early experience. Child Dev 58(3):560–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertenthal B, Campos J, Kermoian R (1994) An epigenetic perspective on the development of self-produced locomotion and its consequences. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 3:140–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bushnell E, Boudreau JP (1993) Motor development and the mind: the potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. Child Dev 64:1005–1021

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campos J, Anderson DI, Barbu-Roth MA, Hubbard EM, Hertenstein MJ, Witherington D (2000) Travel broadens the mind. Infancy 1(2):149–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen X, Liang S, Dolph S, Ragonesi CB, Galloway JC, Agrawal SK (2010) Design of a novel mobility interface for infants on a mobile robot by kicking. J Med Devices ASME 4(3):031006-5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen X, Ragonesi C, Agrawal SK, Galloway JC (2011) Training toddlers seated on mobile robots to drive indoors amidst obstacles. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19(3):271–279

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galloway J, Ryu J, Agrawal S (2008) Babies driving robots: self-generated mobility in very young infants. Intell Serv Robotics 1(2):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilles P, Gustwiller J (2002) Expandable pediatric walker. United State Patents No. US 2002/0038942 AI, Apr.4

  12. Ivanenko YP, Dominici N, Cappellini G, Lacquaniti F (2005) Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability. J Neurophysiol 94(1):754–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones M, McEwen I, Hansen L (2003) Use of power mobility for a young child with spinal muscular atrophy. Phy Ther 83:253–262

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ko CH, Agrawal SK (2010) Control and path planning of a walk-assist robot using differential flatness. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

  15. Larkin D, Summers J (2004) Implications of movement difficulties for social interaction, physical activity, play and sports. In: Developmental Motor Disorders: A Neuropsychological Perspective. The Guildford Press, New York, pp 443–460

  16. Mattern-Baxter K (2010) Locomotor treadmill training for children with cerebral palsy. Orthop Nurs 29:169–73 (quiz 174–5)

    Google Scholar 

  17. NF-Walker. http://eng.eof.no/solutions/NF-WALKER-R-M5

  18. Ragonesi C, Chen X, Agrawal S, Galloway J (2010) Power mobility and socialization in preschool: a case report on a child with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther 22(3):322–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Snyder R, Spencer M, Owing C, Schneider L (1975) Physical characteristics of children as related to death and injury for consumer product safety design. Highway Safety Research Institute, University of Michigan, Report UM-HSRI-BI-75-5

  20. Spenko M, Yu H, Dubowsky S (2006) Robotic personal aids for mobility and monitoring for the elderly. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14(3):344–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Standing Dani. http://www.standingdani.com/

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Steven Beard for his assistance in the Spencer Lab Machine Shop. We acknowledge financial support from national Institute of Health under grant HD047468 and National Science Foundation under grant NSF0745833.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil K. Agrawal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoepflin, Z.R., Chen, X., Ragonesi, C.B. et al. Design of a novel mobility device controlled by the feet motion of a standing child: a feasibility study. Med Biol Eng Comput 49, 1225–1231 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0820-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0820-5

Keywords

Navigation