Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of hysteroscopical images using texture and vessel descriptors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, hysteroscopy, used as an outpatient office procedure, in combination with endometrial biopsy, has demonstrated its great potential as the method of first choice in the diagnosis of various gynecological abnormalities including abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and endometrial cancer (CA). In patients suffering with AUB, the blood vessels of the endometrium are hypertrophic, whereas in the case of CA vascularization is irregular or anarchic. In this paper, a methodology for the classification of hysteroscopical images of endometrium using vessel and texture features is presented. A total of 28 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, 10 patients with endometrial cancer and 39 subjects with no pathological condition were imaged. 16 of the patients with AUB were premenopausal and 12 postmenopausal, all with CA were postmenopausal, and all with no pathological condition were premenopausal. All images were examined for the appearance of endometrial vessels and non-vascular structures. For each image, 167 texture and vessel’s features were initially extracted, which were reduced after feature selection in only 4 features. The images were classified into three categories using artificial neural networks and the reported classification accuracy was 91.2 %, while the specificity and sensitivity were 83.8 and 93.6 % respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allain M, Cloitre M (1991) Characterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets. Phys Rev A 44:3552–3558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asvestas P, Matsopoulos GK, Nikita KS (1999) Estimation of fractal dimension of images using a fixed mass approach. Pattern Recogn Lett 20:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asvestas PA, Ventouras E, Karanasiou I, and Matsopoulos GK (2008) Classification of event-related potentials associated with response errors in actors. In: 8th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering (BIBE). Athens, Greece

  4. Berget I, Mevik BH, Naes T (2008) New modifications and applications of fuzzy C-means methodology. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:2403–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gavião W, Scharcanski J (2007) Evaluating the mid-secretory endometrium appearance using hysteroscopic digital video summarization. Image Vis Comput 25:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3, pp 610–621

  7. Hickey M, Fraser IS (2002) Surface vascularization and endometrial appearance in women with menorrhagia or using levonorgestrel contraceptive implants. Implications for the mechanisms of breakthrough bleeding. Hum Reprod 17(9):2428–2434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hummel R (1977) Image enhancement by histogram transformation. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 6:184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis BV (1984) Hysteroscopy in gynecological practice: a review. J R Soc Med 77:235–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martinez-Perez ME, Hughes AD, Thom SA, Bharath AA, Parker KH (2007) Segmentation of blood vessels from red-free and fluorescein retinal images. Med Image Anal 11:47–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neophytou MS, Tanos V, Pattichis MS, Pattichis CS, Kyriacou ES, Koutsouris DD (2007) A standardized protocol for texture analysis of endoscopic images in gynecological cancer. Biomed Eng Online

  12. Piramuthu S, Shaw MJ, Gentry JA (1994) A classification approach using multi-layered neural networks. Decis Support Syst 11:509–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1993) Minimization or maximization of functions. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 412–420

  14. Reza AM (2004) Realization of the contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) for real-time image enhancement. J VLSI Sig Proc 38:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Steger C (1998) An unbiased detector of curvilinear structures. IEEE Trans PAMI 20(2):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sugimoto O (1975) Hysteroscopic diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. A report of fifty-three cases examined at the Women’s Clinic of Kyoto University Hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121:105–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van Herendael BJ, Sievens MJ, Flakiewicz-Kula A, Hansch C (1987) Dating of the endometrium by microhysteroscopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 24:114–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zola FE, Nogueira AA, de Andrade JM, Candido dos Reis FJ (2007) Hysteroscopic appearance of malignant and benign endometrial lesions: a case–control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 275:49–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra A. Vlachokosta.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 The sequential floating forward search (SFFS) method

Suppose \( D \) is the number of the available features (\( D = 167 \)), \( i(1 \le i \le D) \) is a feature and \( X_{k} \) is a subset of \( k \) features. The SFFS method requires the existence of a function \( J \) that evaluates the “goodness” of the feature subset under consideration.

  1. Step 1:

    \( X_{0} = \emptyset \) and \( k = 0 \)

  2. Step 2:

    While \( k < 2 \)

    • Find the most significant feature \( y = \mathop {\arg \hbox{Max} }\limits_{{a \in (Y - X_{k} )}} J(X_{k} \cup \{ a\} ) \)

    $$ X_{k + 1} = X_{k} \cup y $$
    $$ k = k + 1 $$
  3. Step 3:

    While \( k < D \)

    • Find the most significant feature \( y = \mathop {\arg \hbox{Max} }\limits_{{a \in (Y - X_{k} )}} J(X_{k} \cup \{ a\} ) \)

    $$ X_{k + 1} = X_{k} \cup y $$
    • While \( k < 2 \)

      Find the least significant feature \( x = \mathop {\arg \hbox{Max} }\limits_{{a \in X_{k} }} J(X_{k} \cup \{ a\} ) \)

      If \( J(X_{k} - \{ x\} ) > J(X_{k - 1} ) \)

      $$ X_{k - 1} = X_{k} - \{ x\} $$
      $$ k = k - 1 $$

The algorithm is initialized by setting \( X_{0} = \emptyset \) and \( k = 0 \) and the feature selection technique is used until the set \( X_{k} \) includes the \( k \) more significant features, with the maximum value of the evaluation function. The subset of the selected features \( X_{k} \) is obtained according to the following rule:

$$ X^{*} = X_{{k^{*} }} $$
$$ k^{*} = \mathop {\arg \hbox{Min} }\limits_{k} \{ J(X_{k} ) = J_{\hbox{Max} } \} $$
$$ J_{\hbox{Max} } = \mathop {\hbox{Max} }\limits_{k} \{ J(X_{k} )\} . $$

The selected evaluation function is the clustering accuracy of the FCM algorithm, which is described above.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vlachokosta, A.A., Asvestas, P.A., Gkrozou, F. et al. Classification of hysteroscopical images using texture and vessel descriptors. Med Biol Eng Comput 51, 859–867 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1058-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1058-1

Keywords

Navigation