Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhanced regeneration of rabbit mandibular defects through a combined treatment of electrical stimulation and rhBMP-2 application

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the new bone regeneration of a rabbit mandibular defect using hBMSCs under electrical stimulation combined with rhBMP-2 in this study. An inner scaffold prepared by setting a collagen sponge with hBMSCs and hydrogel was placed into a polycaprolactone (PCL) outer box, and an electrical stimulation device was installed between the inner scaffold and the outer box. There were three experimental groups depending on electrical stimulation and application of rhBMP-2. The experimental group was divided into the following three groups. Group 1, in which rhBMP-2 (5 μg/defect) was added to hydrogel and electrical stimulation was not applied; Group 2, in which rhBMP-2 (5 μg/defect) was added as in Group 1 and electrical stimulation was applied; and Group 3, in which electrical stimulation was applied and rhBMP-2 (5 μg/defect) was injected directly into defect site. The delivered electrical stimulation was charge-balanced bi-phasic electric current pulses, and electrical stimulation was conducted for 7 days. The stimulation parameters of the bi-phasic electrical current set at an amplitude of 20 μA, a duration of 100 μs and a frequency of 100 Hz. Four weeks after surgery, new bone formation in each group was evaluated using radiography, histology, and micro-computed tomography (μCT). Groups 2 and 3 exhibited a significant increase in new bone formation compared to Group 1, while Group 3 showed the highest level of new bone regeneration. In a comparison between two groups, Group 2 showed a higher bone volume (BV) by 260 % (p < 0.01) compared with Group 1, and Group 3 showed a higher BV by 442 % (p < 0.01) compared with Group 1. The trend of the bone surface density (ratio of new bone to the real defect volume, BS/TV), trabecular number, and connectivity was identical to that of the BV. The total bone mineral density (BMD) of Groups 2 and 3 showed values higher by the ratios of 103 % (p < 0.01) and 107.5 % (p < 0.01) compared with Group 1, respectively. Part BMD for Groups 2 and 3 showed higher values by the ratios of 104.9 % (p < 0.01) and 122.4 % (p < 0.01) compared with Group 1, respectively. These results suggest that the combined treatment of electrical stimulation, hBMSCs, a collagen sponge, hydrogel, and rhBMP-2 was effective for bone regeneration of large-size mandibular defects. The application of rhBMP-2 with an injection following electrical stimulation demonstrated better efficiency as regards bone regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brighton CT, Luessenhop CP, Pollack SR, Steinberg DR, Petrik ME, Kaplan FS (1989) Treatment of castration-induced osteoporosis by a capacitively coupled electrical signal in rat vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg 71:228–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancedda R, Giannoni P, Mastrogiacomo M (2007) A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice. Biomaterials 28:4240–4250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ercan B, Webster TJ (2010) The effect of biphasic electrical stimulation on osteoblast function at anodized nanotubular titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 31:3684–3693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner SE, Frantz RA, Schmidt FL (1999) Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic wound healing: a meta-analysis. Wound Repair Regen 7:495–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Geiger M, Li RH, Friess W (2003) Collagen sponges for bone regeneration with rhBMP-2. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 46:1613–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong JY, Kim YJ, Lee HW, Lee WK, Ko JS, Kim HM (2003) Osteoblastic cell response to thin film of poorly crystalline calcium phosphate apatite formed at low temperatures. Biomaterials 24:2977–2984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hou J, Wang J, Cao L, Qian X, Xing W, Lu J, Liu C (2012) Segmental bone regeneration using rhBMP-2-loaded collagen/chitosan microspheres composite scaffold in a rabbit model. Biomed Mater 7:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang Y, Kaigler D, Rice KG, Krebsbach PH, Mooney DJ (2005) Combined angiogenic and osteogenic factor delivery enhances bone marrow stromal cell-driven bone regeneration. J Bone Miner Res 20:848–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Katagiri T, Yamaguchi A, Komaki M, Abe E, Takahashi N, Ikeda T, Rosen V, Wozney JM, Fujisawa-Sehara A, Suda T (1994) Bone morphogenetic protein-2 converts the differentiation pathway of C2C12 myoblasts into the osteoblast lineage. J Cell Biol 127:1755–1766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HM, Kim Y, Park SJ, Rey C, Lee HM, Glimcher MJ, Ko JS (2000) Thin film of low crystalline calcium phosphate apatite formed at low temperature. Biomaterials 21:1129–1134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim IS, Cho TH, Lee ZH, Hwang SJ (2013) Bone regeneration by transplantation of human mesenchymal stromal cells in a rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis model. Tissue Eng Part A 19:66–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim IS, Lee EN, Cho TH, Song YM, Hwang SJ, Oh JH, Park EK, Koo TY, Seo YK (2011) Promising efficacy of escherichia coli recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in collagen sponge for ectopic and orthotopic bone formation and comparison with mammalian cell recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Tissue Eng Part A 17:337–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim IS, Song JK, Zhang YL, Lee TH, Cho TH, Song YM, Kim DK, Kim SJ, Hwang SJ (2006) Biphasic electric current stimulates proliferation and induces VEGF production in osteoblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763:907–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim J, Lee TH, Song YM, Kim IS, Cho TH, Hwang SJ, Kim SJ (2011) An implantable electrical bioreactor for enhancement of cell viability. Conference Proceedings of IEEE EMBS 2011:3601–3604

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim J, Kim IS, Cho TH, Lee KB, Hwang SJ, Tae G, Noh I, Lee SH, Park Y, Sun K (2007) Bone regeneration using hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel with bone morphogenic protein-2 and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 28:1830–1837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kingsley DM (1994) What do BMPs do in mammals? Clues from the mouse short-ear mutation. Trends Genet 10:16–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kloth LC (2005) Electrical stimulation for wound healing: a review of evidence from in vitro studies, animal experiments, and clinical trials. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 4:23–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee YJ, Ko JS, Kim HM (2006) The role of cell signaling defects on the proliferation of osteoblasts on the calcium phosphate apatite thin film. Biomaterials 27:3738–3744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo T, Zhang W, Shi B, Cheng X, Zhang Y (2012) Enhanced bone regeneration around dental implant with bone morphogenetic protein 2 gene and vascular endothelial growth factor protein delivery. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:467–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakashima M, Reddi AH (2003) The application of bone morphogenetic proteins to dental tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 21:1025–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nunotani Y, Abe M, Shirai H, Otsuka H (2005) Efficacy of rhBMP-2 during distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Sci 10:529–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Petite H, Viateau V, Bensaid W, Meunier A, Pollak C, Bourguignon M, Oudina K, Sedel L, Guillemin G (2000) Tissue-engineered bone regeneration. Nat Biotechnol 18:959–963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Resende MM, Amaral SL, Moreno C, Greene AS (2008) Congenic strains reveal the effect of the renin gene on skeletal muscle angiogenesis induced by electrical stimulation. Physiol Genomics 33:33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rijal KP, Kashimoto O, Sakurai M (1994) Effect of capacitively coupled electric-fields on an experimental-model of delayed union of fracture. J Orthop Res 12:262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Simmons CA, Alsberg E, Hsiong S, Kim WJ, Mooney DJ (2004) Dual growth factor delivery and controlled scaffold degradation enhance in vivo bone formation by transplanted bone marrow stromal cells. Bone 35:562–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Simon J, Simon B (2008) Electrical Bone Stimulation. In: Pietrzak. WS (ed) Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 259–287

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang S, Tian YS, Lee YJ, Yub FH, Kim HM (2011) Mechanisms by which the inhibition of specific intracellular signaling pathways increase osteoblast proliferation on apatite surfaces. Biomaterials 32:2851–2861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yen-Patton GPA, Patton WF, Beer DM, Jacobson BS (1988) Endothelial cell response to pulsed electromagnetic fields: stimulation of growth rate and angiogenesis in vitro. J Cell Physiol 134:37–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao M, Bai H, Wang E, Forrester JV, McCaig CD (2004) Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors. J Cell Sci 117:397–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 Project, the Department of Electrical Engineering at Seoul National University in 2011 and by the Korea Health 21 R&D Project of the Ministry of Health and Welfare (A084359) of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Soon Jung Hwang or Sung June Kim.

Additional information

Authors J. Kim and H. J. Yang have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J., Yang, H.J., Cho, T.H. et al. Enhanced regeneration of rabbit mandibular defects through a combined treatment of electrical stimulation and rhBMP-2 application. Med Biol Eng Comput 51, 1339–1348 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1106-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1106-x

Keywords

Navigation