Skip to main content
Log in

Magneto-acoustic imaging by continuous-wave excitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electrical characteristics of tissue yield valuable information for early diagnosis of pathological changes. Magneto-acoustic imaging is a functional approach for imaging of electrical conductivity. This study proposes a continuous-wave magneto-acoustic imaging method. A kHz-range continuous signal with an amplitude range of several volts is used to excite the magneto-acoustic signal and improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The magneto-acoustic signal amplitude and phase are measured to locate the acoustic source via lock-in technology. An optimisation algorithm incorporating nonlinear equations is used to reconstruct the magneto-acoustic source distribution based on the measured amplitude and phase at various frequencies. Validation simulations and experiments were performed in pork samples. The experimental and simulation results agreed well. While the excitation current was reduced to 10 mA, the acoustic signal magnitude increased up to 10−7 Pa. Experimental reconstruction of the pork tissue showed that the image resolution reached mm levels when the excitation signal was in the kHz range. The signal-to-noise ratio of the detected magneto-acoustic signal was improved by more than 25 dB at 5 kHz when compared to classical 1 MHz pulse excitation. The results reported here will aid further research into magneto-acoustic generation mechanisms and internal tissue conductivity imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aliroteh MS, Scott G, Arbabian A (2014) A frequency-modulated magneto-acoustic detection and imaging. Electron Lett 50(11):790–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Craig EC (1993) Electronics via waveform analysis. Springer, New York, pp 315–317

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Emerson JF, Chang DB, McNaughton S, Jeong JS, Shung KK, Cerwin SA (2013) Electromagnetic acoustic imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectron 60(2):364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guoqiang L, Xin H, Hui H (2013) Magnetoacoustic tomography with current injection. Chin Sci Bull 58(30):3600–3606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu G, He B (2011) Magnetoacoustic imaging of electrical conductivity of biological tissues at a spatial resolution better than 2 mm. PLoS One 6(8):e23421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu G, Cressman E, He B (2011) Magnetoacoustic imaging of human liver tumor with magnetic induction. Appl Phys Lett 98:023703

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Li X, He B (2010) Multi-excitation magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction (MAT-MI). Int Conf Electr Bioimpedance. 224:012035

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mariappan L, Hu G, He B (2014) Magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction for high-resolution bioimepedance imaging through vector source reconstruction under the static field of MRI magnet. Med Phys 41:022902

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohamad Salim MI, Supriyanto E, Haueisen J, Ariffin I, Ahmad AH, Rosidi B (2013) Measurement of bioelectric and acoustic profile of breast tissue using hybrid magnetoacoustic method for cancer detection. Med Biol Eng Comput 51(4):459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mongrain G, Destrempes F, Mari JM, Souchon R, Catheline S, Chapelon JY, Cloutier G (2015) Acousto-electrical speckle pattern in Lorentz force electrical impedance tomography. Phys Med Biol 60:3747–3757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Montalibet A, Jossinet J, Matias A (2001) Electric current generated by ultrasonically induced Lorentz force in biological media. Med Biol Eng Comput 39(1):15–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Narayana N (2006) Elements of engineering electromagnetics. China Machine Press, Beijing, pp 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oppenheim A, Wliisky AS, Nawab H (1998) Signals and systems. Xian jiaotong university press & Prentice Hall, New York, pp 371–392

    Google Scholar 

  14. Powell MJD (1970) A new algorithm for unconstrained optimisation. Academic Press Inc, New York, pp 31–66

    Google Scholar 

  15. Renzhiglova E, Ivantsiv V, Xu Y (2010) Difference frequency magneto-acousto-electrical tomography (DF-MAET) application of ultrasound-induced radiation force to imaging electrical current density. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectron 57(11):2319–2402

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roth BJ (2011) The role of magnetic forces in biology and medicine. B Exp Biol Med 236:132–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth BJ, Basser PJ, John PW (1994) A theoretical model for magneto-acoustic imaging of bioelectric currents. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 41(8):723–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roth BJ, Luterek A, Puwal S (2014) The movement of a nerve in a magnetic field: application to MRI Lorentz effect imaging. Med Biol Eng Comput 52(5):491–498

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Scofield JH (1994) Frequency-domain description of a lock-in amplifier. Am J Phys 62(2):129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shigang W, Shunqi Z, Ren M, Tao Y, Zhipeng L (2014) A study of acoustic source generation mechanism of Magnetoacoustic Tomography. Comput Med Imaging Graph 38(1):42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun Xiaodong, Zhang Feng, Ma Qingyu, Juan Tu, Zhang Dong (2012) Acoustic dipole radiation based conductivity image reconstruction for magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction. Appl Phys Lett 100:024105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Towe BC, Islam MR (1988) A magneto-acoustic method for the noninvasive measurement of bioelectric currents. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 35(10):892–894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tseng Nancy, Roth Bradley J (2008) The potential induced in anisotropic tissue by the ultrasonically-induced Lorentz force. Med Biol Eng Comput 46(2):195–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wen H, Shah J, Balaban RS (1998) Hall Effect imaging. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 45(1):119–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao-Dong S, Xin W, Yu-Qi Z, Qing-Yu M, Dong Z (2015) Reception pattern influence on magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction. Chin Phys B 24(1):014302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu Y, He B (2005) Magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction (MAT-MI). Phys Med Biol 50:5175–5187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Fund of China (#81171424, #51137004, #61501523) and the Tianjin Youth Fund in Basic Research on Application (#13JCQNJC14000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Zhipeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shunqi, Z., Zhou, X., Tao, Y. et al. Magneto-acoustic imaging by continuous-wave excitation. Med Biol Eng Comput 55, 595–607 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1538-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1538-1

Keywords