Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An automatic and patient-specific algorithm to design the optimal insertion direction of pedicle screws for spine surgery templates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many diseases of the spine require surgical treatments that are currently performed based on the experience of the surgeon. For pedicle arthrodesis surgery, two critical factors must be addressed: Screws must be applied correctly and exposure to harmful radiation must be avoided. The incorrect positioning of the screws may cause operating failures that lead to subsequent reoperations, an increase in the overall duration of surgery and, therefore, more harmful, real-time X-ray checks. In this paper, the authors solve these problems by developing a method to realize a customized surgical template that acts as a drilling template. The template has two cylindrical guides that follow a correct trajectory previously calculated by means of an automatic algorithm generated on the basis of a vertebra CAD model for a specific patient. The surgeon sets the template (drilling guides) on the patient’s vertebra and safely applies the screws. Three surgical interventions for spinal stabilization have been performed using the template. These have had excellent results with regard to the accuracy of the screw positioning, reduction of the overall duration of the intervention, and reduction of the number of times the patient was exposed to X-rays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrillo U (2013) UOC neurochirurgia. In: ASL ROMA 2. http://www.aslromab.it/cittadini/ospedali/pertini/dip_chirurgia/UOC_neurochirurgia.php

  2. Baldino L, Naddeo F, Cardea S, Naddeo A, Reverchon E (2015) FEM modeling of the reinforcement mechanism of hydroxyapatite in PLLA scaffolds produced by supercritical drying, for tissue engineering applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 51:225–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry E, Cuppone M, Porada S (2005) Personalised imagebased templates for intra-operative guidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng 219(2):111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bibb R, Eggbeer D, Evans P, Bocca A, Sugar A (2009) Rapid manufacture of custom-fitting surgical guides. Rapid Prototoping J 15(5):346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Birnbaum K, Schkommodau E, Decker N, Prescher A, Klapper U, Radermacher K (2001) Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery with individual templates and comparison to conventional operation method. Spine 26(4):365–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappetti N, Naddeo A, Naddeo F, Solitro GF (2016) Finite elements/Taguchi-method based procedure for the identification of the geometrical parameters significantly affecting the biomechanical behavior of a lumbar disc. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 19(12):1278–1285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciocca L, Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Persiani F, Scotti R (2011) Computer-aided design and manufacturing construction of a surgical template for craniofacial implant positioning to support a definitive nasal prosthesis. Clin Oral Implant Res 22:850–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Ciocca L (2012) Design and manufacturing of customized surgical devices for mandibular rehabilitation. Int J Interact Des Manuf 7(4):227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goffin J, Van Brussel K, Martens K, Vander Sloten J, Van Audekercke R, Smet MH (2001) Three-dimensional computed tomography-based, personalized drill guide for posterior cervical stabilization at C1–2. Spine 26:1343–1347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaneyama S, Sugawara T, Sumi M (2015) Safe and accurate midcervical pedicle screw insertion procedure with the patient-specific screw guide template system. Spine 40(6):341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kashani J (2012) A surgical drill guide for pedicle screw placement. Int Conf Biomed Eng 1:305–307

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, Li YB, Shi JH, Chen GP, Chen YB (2009) Rapid Prototyping drill guide template for lumbar pedicle screw placement. Chin J Traumatol 12(3):171–177

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, Xie L, Guo H, Li DP (2009) A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for placement of C2 laminar screws. Eur Spine J 18:1379–1385

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu S, Xu YQ, Chen GP, Zhang YZ, Lu D, Chen YB, Shi JH, Xu M (2011) Efficacy and accuracy of a novel rapid prototyping drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Comput Aided Surg 16(5):240–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma T, Xu YQ, Cheng YB, Jiang MY, Xu XM, Xie L, Lu S (2012) A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Merc M, Drstvensek I, Vogrin M, Brajlih T, Recnik G (2013) A multi-level rapid prototyping drill guide template reduces the perforation risk of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and sacral spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(7):893–899. doi:10.1007/s0040201317550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Naddeo F, Baldino L, Cardea S, Naddeo A, Reverchon E (2016) Optimization of an ad hoc realized lattice structure structured RVE for FEM modeling of nanoporous biopolymeric scaffolds obtained by supercritical fluids assisted process. Chem Eng Trans 49:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naddeo F, Cappetti N, Naddeo A (2016) Novel load adaptive algorithm based procedure for 3D printing of cancellous bone-inspired structures. Compos Part B: Eng. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.033

    Google Scholar 

  19. Naddeo F, Naddeo A, Cappetti N (2016) Novel load adaptive algorithm based procedure for 3D printing of lattice-based components showing parametric curved micro-beams. Compos Part B: Eng. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.037

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pacheco HO (2007) Method for determining size and placement of pedicle screw in spinal surgery. Patent CN1960680B

  21. Popescu D, Parpala RC, Laptoiu DC, Antoniac I (2010) Computer-aided technique for determining spinal pedicle screw size and optimal insertion trajectory. Ann DAAAM Proc 1:527–533

    Google Scholar 

  22. Popescu D, Amza CGh, Anania DF, Amza Gh, Cicic DT (2011) Intelligent x-ray based training system for pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Acad J Manuf Eng 9(1):94–101

    Google Scholar 

  23. Popescu D, Anania DF, Amza CG, Cicic DT (2012) Design and rapid manufacturing of patient-specific spinal surgical guides: a survey. Proc Manuf Syst 7(2):2067–9238

    Google Scholar 

  24. Porada S, Millnerb P, Chivertonb N, Berryc E, Seedhom BB (2001) Computer aided surgery with lumbar vertebral drill-guides, using computer aided planning. Design and visualisation. http://events.cs.bham.ac.uk/miua2001/posters/porada.pdf

  25. Ryken TC (2009) Image-based drill templates for cervical pedicle screw placement: laboratory investigation. Neurosurg Spine 10:21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryken TC, Kim J, Owen BD, Christensen GE, Reinhardt JM (2009) Engineering patient-specific drill templates and bioabsorbable posterior cervical plates: a feasibility study. J Neurosurg Spine 10:129–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Salako F, Aubin CE, Fortin C, Labelle H (2002) Feasibility study of patient-specific surgical templates for the fixation of pedicle screws. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:419–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Salako F, Aubin CE, Fortin C, Labelle H (2003) Development of patient-specific surgical templates, using rapid prototyping, for the fixation of pedicle screws. ITBMRBM 24:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sugawara T, Higashiyama N, Kaneyama S, Takabatake M, Watanabe N, Uchida F, Sumi M, Mizoi K (2013) Multistep pedicle screw insertion procedure with patient-specific lamina fit-and-lock templates for the thoracic spine: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(2):85–90. doi:10.3171/20134SPINE121059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Techno DESIGN Srl, Naddeo A, Cataldo E, Naddeo F, Cappetti N, Ruggieri R (2015) Dima di foratura direzionale per chirurgia vertebrale. Italian patent NA2015U000019

  31. Techno DESIGN Srl, Naddeo A, Cataldo E, Naddeo F, Cappetti N, Ruggieri R (2015) Metodologia per l’individuazione della direzione ottima e del diametro massimo di una vite peduncolare affinché la vite non fuoriesca dal peduncolo durante l’inserimento. Italian patent no. 102015000036889. European patent no. 16180848.0 (method for identifying the optimal direction and maximum diameter of a pedicle screw so that the screw will not come out of the pedicle in operations of pedicle arthrodesis)

  32. Van Brussel K, Vander Sloten J, Van Audekercke R (1997) Medical image based design of an individualized surgical guide for pedicle screw insertion. In: Proceedings 18th annual conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. Bridg Discipl Biomed 1(1):225–226

  33. Wiker RB, Tedla B (2004) Methods and systems for image-guided placement of implants. Patent US 2004/0240715 A1

  34. Yoo T (2003) 3D informatics: a research program in high performance computing; a report to the board of scientific counselors, lister hill national center for biomedical communications

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084, Fisciano, SA, Italy

    Francesco Naddeo, Alessandro Naddeo & Nicola Cappetti

  2. Techno DESIGN S.r.l., via Rosa Jemma, 2, 84091, Battipaglia, SA, Italy

    Emilio Cataldo

  3. “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona” University Hospital, Largo Città di Ippocrate, 84131, Salerno, Italy

    Nicola Narciso

Authors
  1. Francesco Naddeo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emilio Cataldo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandro Naddeo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicola Cappetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicola Narciso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Naddeo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Italian ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Italian Law and have been approved by the Ethical Review Board of the San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona University Hospital in Salerno, where the trial/tests were conducted.

Informed consent

All human participants have had the testing protocol explained, including the nature of the used medical devices and risks and benefits they might have while being treated with the new surgery device. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naddeo, F., Cataldo, E., Naddeo, A. et al. An automatic and patient-specific algorithm to design the optimal insertion direction of pedicle screws for spine surgery templates. Med Biol Eng Comput 55, 1549–1562 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1627-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1627-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation