Abstract
The purpose of this review is to make a contribution to build a comprehensive knowledge of the main aspects related to the occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environments. Information has been obtained from original research papers published in international peer-reviewed journals in the English language and from documents published by governmental bodies and authorities. An overview of the occupational exposure scenarios to static magnetic fields, motion-induced, time-varying magnetic fields, and gradient and radiofrequency fields is provided, together with a summary of the relevant regulation for limiting exposure. A particular emphasis is on reviewing the main EMF exposure assessment approaches found in the literature. Exposure assessment is carried out either by measuring the unperturbed magnetic fields in the MRI rooms, or by personal monitoring campaigns, or by the use of numerical methods. A general lack of standardization of the procedures and technologies adopted for exposure assessment has emerged, which makes it difficult to perform a direct comparison of results from different studies carried out by applying different assessment strategies. In conclusion, exposure assessment approaches based on data collection and numerical models need to be better defined in order to respond to specific research questions. That would provide for a more complete characterization of the exposure patterns and for identification of the factors determining the exposure variability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moser E, Stahlberg F, Ladd ME, Trattnig S (2012) 7-T MR-from research to clinical applications? NMR Biomed 25(5):695–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1794
McRobbie DW (2012) Occupational exposure in MRI. Br J Radiol 85(1012):293–312. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/30146162
Lauterbur PC (1973) Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 242(5394):190–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/242190a0
Mansfield P (1977) Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes. J Phys C Solid State Phys 10:55–58
Betta G, Capriglione D, Pasquino N (2012) Experimental investigation on workers ’ exposure to electromagnetic fields in proximity of magnetic resonance imaging systems. Measurement 45(2):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.03.001
Bradley JK, Nyekiova M, Price DL, Lopez LD, Crawley T (2007) Occupational exposure to static and time-varying gradient magnetic fields in MR units. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(5):1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21152
McRobbie DW, Moore EA, Graves MJ, Prince MR (2006) MRI from picture to proton. Cambridge University Press, New York
Edelstein WA, Hutchison JM, Smith FW et al (1981) Human whole-body NMR tomographic imaging: normal sections. Br J Radiol 54(638):149–151. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-54-638-149
Schaap K, Christopher-De Vries Y, Slottje P, Kromhout H (2013) Inventory of MRI applications and workers exposed to MRI-related electromagnetic fields in the Netherlands. Eur J Radiol 82(12):2279–2285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.023
Shellock FG, Crues JV (2004) MR Procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient. Radiology 232(3):635–652. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2323030830
Shellock FG, Crues JV (2014) MRI bioeffects, safety, and patient management. Biomedical Research Publishing Group, Los Angels
Kim SJ, Kim KA (2017) Safety issues and updates under MR environments. Eur J Radiol 89:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.010
Crook N, Robinson L (2009) A review of the safety implications of magnetic resonance imaging at field strengths of 3Tesla and above. Radiography 15(4):351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2009.07.004
Stikova E (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging safety: principles and guidelines. Prilozi 33(1):441–472
Kangarlu A, Robitaille PL (2000) Biological effects and health implications in magnetic resonance imaging. Concepts Magn Reson 12(5):321–359.
Durbridge G (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging: fundamental safety issues. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 41:820–828
Shigemitsu T, Ueno S (2017) Biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields related to the operation of MRI/TMS. Spine 7:1740009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010324717400094
Shellock FG (2014) Reference manual for magnetic resonance safety, implants, and devices: 2014 edition. Biomedical Research Publishing Group, Playa Del Rey
Kugel H (2012) Safety considerations in interventional MRI. In: Kahn T, Busse H (eds) Interv. Magn. Reson. Imaging. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2012_570
Woods TO (2007) Standards for medical devices in MRI: present and future. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(5):1186–1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21140
Alorainy IA, Albadr FB, Abujamea AH (2006) Attitude towards MRI safety during pregnancy. Ann Saudi Med 26(4):306–309. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2006.306
De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL (2005) A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2-3):335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.08.010
Eskandar O, Eckford S, Watkinson T (2010) Safety of diagnostic imaging in pregnancy. Part 2: magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound scanning and Doppler assessment. Obstet Gynaecol 12(3):171–177. https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.12.3.171.27599
Patenaude Y, Pugash D, Lim K, Morin L, Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Lim K, Bly S, Butt K, Cargill Y, Davies G, Denis N, Hazlitt G, Morin L, Naud K, Ouellet A, Salem S, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2014) The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 36(4):349–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30612-5
Pamboucas CA, Rokas SG (2008) Clinical safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: cardiovascular devices and contrast agents. Hell J Cardiol 49:352–356
Shellock FG, Kanal E (1999) Safety of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 10(3):477–484.
Hartwig V, Giovannetti G, Vanello N, Lombardi M, Landini L, Simi S (2009) Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Int J Env Res Public Health 6(6):1778–1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6061778
Vijayalaxmi, Fatahi M, Speck O (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a review of genetic damage investigations. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 764:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.02.002
Ghodbane S, Lahbib A, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H (2013) Bioeffects of static magnetic Fields : oxidative stress, genotoxic effects, and cancer studies. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/602987
SCENIHR (2015) Potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). https://doi.org/10.2772/75635
ICNIRP (2009) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys 96(4):504–514. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000343164.27920.4a
ICNIRP (2010) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys 99:818–836. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86
EU (2013) Directive 2013/35/EU of the European Parliament And Of The Council of 26 June 2013 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields)
De Vocht F, Batistatou E, Mölter A et al (2015) Transient health symptoms of MRI staff working with 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla scanners in the UK. Eur Radiol 25(9):2718–2726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3629-z
Schaap K, Christopher-de Vries Y, Mason CK, de Vocht F, Portengen L, Kromhout H (2014) Occupational exposure of healthcare and research staff to static magnetic stray fields from 1.5-7 Tesla MRI scanners is associated with reporting of transient symptoms. Occup Environ Med 71(6):423–429. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101890
Schaap K, Christopher-De Vries Y, Cambron-Goulet É, Kromhout H (2016) Work-related factors associated with occupational exposure to static magnetic stray fields from MRI scanners. Magn Reson Med 75(5):2141–2155. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25720
Schaap K, Portengen L, Kromhout H (2016) Exposure to MRI-related magnetic fields and vertigo in MRI workers. Occup Environ Med 73(3):161–166. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103019
Sammet S (2016) Magnetic resonance safety. Abdom Radiol 41(3):444–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0680-4
Karpowicz J, Gryz K (2006) Health risk assessment of occupational exposure to a magnetic field from magnetic resonance imaging devices. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 12(2):155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2006.11076679
Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C et al (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(3):501–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24011
Gyekye SA (2005) Workers’ perceptions of workplace safety and job satisfaction. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 11(3):291–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2005.11076650
ICNIRP (1994) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys 66(4):100–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000343164.27920.4a
ICNIRP (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 74(3):494–522. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3181aff9db
EU (2004) Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29April 2004 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields).Official Journal of the Eu
Hill DLG, McLeish K, Keevil SF (2005) Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe? Acad Radiol 12(9):1135–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.023
Keevil SF (2006) Impact of the physical agents (EMF) directive on medical magnetic resonance imaging. IET Semin. Phys. Agents Dir, London, pp 47–56
Moore EA, Scurr ED (2007) British association of MR radiographers (BAMRR) safety survey 2005: potential impact of European union (EU) physical agents directive (PAD) on electromagnetic fields (EMF). J Magn Reson Imaging 26(5):1303–1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21154
Young I, McRobbie DW, Keevil SF, Taylor A (2006) Unintended consequences of an unwarrantedly cautious approach to safety. Br J Hosp Med 67(4):174–175. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2006.67.4.20860
EU (2015) Non-binding guide to good practice for implementing Directive 2013/35/EU Volume 2: Case Studies
EU (2015) Non-binding guide to good practice for implementing Directive 2013/35/EU Electromagnetic Fields Volume 1: Practical Guide
ICNIRP (2014) Guidelines for limiting exposure to electric fields induced by and by time-varying magnetic fields below 1 Hz. Health Phys 106(3):418–425. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e31829e5580
U.S. Food and Drug Administration C (2014) Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations of Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff
IEEE (2002) Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electromagnetic fields, 0–3 kHz
IEEE (2006) Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz
International Electrotechnical Commision (2010) IEC 60601-2-33:2010 Medical electrical equipment—part 2–33: particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis
IARC (2002) Sources, exposure and exposure assessment. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 80:51–93
Hand JW (2008) Modelling the interaction of electromagnetic fields (10 MHz – 10 GHz) with the human body: methods and applications. Phys Med Biol 53(16):R243–R246. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/16/R01
Karpowicz J, Hietanen M, Gryz K (2007) Occupational risk from static magnetic fields of MRI scanners. Environmentalist 27(4):533–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9064-1
Bongers S, Christopher Y, Engels H et al (2013) Retrospective assessment of exposure to static magnetic fields during production and development of magnetic resonance imaging systems. Ann Occup Hyg 58:85–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/met049
Úbeda A, Martínez MA, Cid MA, Chacón L, Trillo MA, Leal J (2011) Assessment of occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields in hospital personnel. Bioelectromagnetics 32(5):378–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20644
Andreuccetti D, Contessa GM, Falsaperla R, Lodato R, Pinto R, Zoppetti N, Rossi P (2013) Weighted-peak assessment of occupational exposure due to MRI gradient fields and movements in a nonhomogeneous static magnetic field. Med Phys 40(1):11910. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4771933
Gourzoulidis G, Karabetsos E, Skamnakis N et al (2015) Occupational electromagnetic fields exposure in magnetic resonance imaging systems—preliminary results for the RF harmonic content. Phys Med 31(7):757–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.03.006
Bonutti F, Tecchio M, Maieron M, Trevisan D, Negro C, Calligaris F (2016) Measurement of the weighted peak level for occupational exposure to gradient magnetic fields for 1.5 and 3 Tesla MRI body scanners. Radiat Prot Dosim 168:358–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv308
Riches SF, Collins DJ, Scuffham JW, Leach MO (2007) EU Directive 2004/40: field measurements of a 1.5 T clinical MR scanner. Br J Radiol 80(954):483–487. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/69843752
Stralka JP, Bottomley PA (2007) A prototype RF dosimeter for independent measurement of the average specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI. J Magn Reson 26(5):1296–1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21141.A
Fatahi M, Karpowicz J, Gryz K, Fattahi A, Rose G, Speck O (2017) Evaluation of exposure to (ultra) high static magnetic fields during activities around human MRI scanners. MAGMA 30(3):255–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0602-z
Crozier S, Wilson SJ, Gregg I (2011) US7936168B2 magnetic field dosimeter
Fuentes MA, Trakic A, Wilson SJ, Crozier S (2008) Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(4):1355–1364. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.913410
Schaap K, Christopher-De Vries Y, Crozier S et al (2014) Exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields from working in the static magnetic stray fields of MRI scanners: a comprehensive survey in the Netherlands. Ann Occup Hyg 58:1094–1110. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meu057
Batistatou E, Molter A, Kromhout H et al (2016) Personal exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields during MRI procedures in clinical practice in the UK. Occup Environ Med 73:779–786. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103194
De Vocht F, Muller F, Engels H, Kromhout H (2009) Personal exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields during MRI system test procedures. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(5):1223–1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21952
Kännälä S, Toivo T, Alanko T, Jokela K (2009) Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners. Phys Med Biol 54(7):2243–2257. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/7/026
Groebner J, Umathum R, Bock M, Krafft AJ, Semmler W, Rauschenberg J (2011) MR safety: simultaneous B0, df/dt, and dB/dt measurements on MR-workers up to 7T. MAGMA 24(6):315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-011-0270-y
Glover PM, Bowtell R (2008) Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients. Phys Med Biol 53(2):361–373. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/2/005
Acri G, Testagrossa B, Causa F, Tripepi MG, Vermiglio G, Novario R, Pozzi L, Quadrelli G (2014) Evaluation of occupational exposure in magnetic resonance sites. Radiol Med 119(3):208–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0324-5
De Vocht F, Van Drooge H, Engels H, Kromhout H (2006) Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department. J Magn Reson Imaging 23(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20485
Crozier S, Trakic A, Wang H, Liu F (2007) Numerical study of currents in workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(5):1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21160
Chiampi M, Zilberti L (2011) Induction of electric field in human bodies moving near MRI: an efficient BEM computational procedure. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(10):2787–2793. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2158315
Wang H, Trakic A, Liu F, Crozier S (2008) Numerical field evaluation of healthcare workers when bending towards high-field MRI magnets. Magn Reson Med 59(2):410–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21441
Cobos Sánchez C, Glover P, Power H, Bowtell R (2012) Calculation of the electric field resulting from human body rotation in a magnetic field. Phys Med Biol 57(15):4739–4753. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/15/4739
Laakso I, Kännälä S, Jokela K (2013) Computational dosimetry of induced electric fields during realistic movements in the vicinity of a 3 T MRI scanner. Phys Med Biol 58(8):2625–2640. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/8/2625
Zilberti L, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M (2015) Biomagnetics motion-induced fields in magnetic resonance imaging : are the dielectric currents really negligible? IEEEE Magn Lett 6:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LMAG.2015.2429641
Zilberti L, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M (2016) Assessment of exposure to MRI motion-induced fields based on the international commission on non-ionizing radiation protection (ICNIRP) guidelines. Magn Reson Med 76(4):1291–1300. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26031
Zradziński P (2015) Difficulties in applying numerical simulations to an evaluation of occupational hazards caused by electromagnetic fields. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 21(2):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1028233
Crozier S, Wang H, Trakic A, Liu F (2007) Exposure of workers to pulsed gradients in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(5):1236–1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21162
Li Y, Hand JW, Wills T, Hajnal JV (2007) Numerically-simulated induced electric field and current density within a human model located close to a z-gradient coil. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(5):1286–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21137
Li Y, Hand J, Christ A, et al (2009) Modeling occupational exposure to RF and gradient fields associated with an interventional procedure in an open 1 T MR system. Proc 17th Sci Meet Int Soc Magn Reson Med Honolulu 3042
Hartwig V, Vanello N, Giovannetti G, Lombardi M, Landini L, Santarelli MF (2011) A novel tool for estimation of magnetic resonance occupational exposure to spatially varying magnetic fields. MAGMA 24(6):323–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-011-0279-2
Hartwig V, Vanello N, Giovannetti G, Landini L, Santarelli MF (2014) Estimation of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields due to usual movements in magnetic resonance units. Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng 44(3):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.21270
Farrag SI (2015) Numerical simulation of the induced currents in occupational workers induced by body-motion around different MRI fields. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 5:66–71
Farrag SI (2014) Numerical computation of specific absorption rate and induced current for workers exposed to static magnetic fields of MRI scanners. I.E. Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES):612–617
Yamaguchi-Sekino S, Nakai T, Imai S, Izawa S, Okuno T (2014) Occupational exposure levels of static magnetic field during routine MRI examination in 3T MR system. Bioelectromagnetics 35(1):70–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21817
Acri G, Testagrossa B, Vermiglio G (2015) Personal time-varying magnetic fields evaluation during activities in MRI sites. IFMBE Proc 51:741–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19387-8_182
Koeman T, Slottje P, Kromhout H, Schouten LJ, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Vermeulen R (2013) Occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and cardiovascular disease mortality in a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 70(6):402–407. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-100889
Zilberti L, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M (2016) A potential-based formulation for motion-induced electric fields in MRI. IEEE Trans Magn 52(3):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2015.2474748
Karpowicz J, Gryz K (2013) The pattern of exposure to static magnetic field of nurses involved in activities related to contrast administration into patients diagnosed in 1.5 T MRI scanners. Electromagn Biol Med 32(2):182–191. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2013.776428
Kabil J, Belguerras L, Trattnig S, Pasquier C, Felblinger J, Missoffe A (2016) A review of numerical simulation and analytical modeling for medical devices safety in MRI. Yearb Med Inform 10(1):152–158. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2016-016
Bottauscio O, Cassarà a M, Hand JW et al (2015) Assessment of computational tools for MRI RF dosimetry by comparison with measurements on a laboratory phantom. Phys Med Biol 60(14):5655–5680. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/5655
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Dr. Mats-Olof Mattsson, (Austrian Institute of Technology, Tulln, Austria) for proof-reading the paper and for the useful comments and suggestions provided.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartwig, V., Romeo, S. & Zeni, O. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches. Med Biol Eng Comput 56, 531–545 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1779-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1779-7