Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of pressure ulcer tissues with 3D convolutional neural network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 3D convolution neural network (CNN) of deep learning architecture is supplied with essential visual features to accurately classify and segment granulation, necrotic eschar, and slough tissues in pressure ulcer color images. After finding a region of interest (ROI), the features are extracted from both the original and convolved with a pre-selected Gaussian kernel 3D HSI images, combined with first-order models of current and prior visual appearance. The models approximate empirical marginal probability distributions of voxel-wise signals with linear combinations of discrete Gaussians (LCDG). The framework was trained and tested on 193 color pressure ulcer images. The classification accuracy and robustness were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the percentage area distance (PAD), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The obtained preliminary DSC of 92%, PAD of 13%, and AUC of 95% are promising.

The Classification of Pressure Ulcer Tissues Based on 3D Convolutional Neural Network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mukherjee R, Manohar DD, Das DK, Achar A, Mitra A, Chakraborty C (2014) Automated tissue classification framework for reproducible chronic wound assessment. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fauzi MFA, Khansa I, Catignani K, Gordillo G, Sen CK, Gurcan MN (2015) Computerized segmentation and measurement of chronic wound images. Comput Biol Med 60:74–85. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482515000645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, Gottrup F, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT (2009) Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen 17(6):763–771. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cuddigan J, Berlowitz DR, Ayello EA (2001) Pressure ulcers in america: prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. Adv Skin Wound Care 14(4):208–215

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deprez JF, Cloutier G, Schmitt C, Gehin C, Dittmar A, Basset O, Brusseau E (2007) 3d ultrasound elastography for early detection of lesions. evaluation on a pressure ulcer mimicking phantom. In: 2007 29th annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society , pp 79–82

  6. Agostini JV, Baker DI, Bogardus ST Making health care safer: A critical analysis of patient safety practices. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2001, no. 27, ch. Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Older Patients, pp 301–306

  7. Leachtenauer J, Kell S, Turner B, Newcomer C, Lyder C, Alwan M (2006) A non-contact imaging-based approach to detecting stage i pressure ulcers. In: the proceedings of the 2006 international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 6380–6383

  8. Prado A, Andrades P, Benítez S Cirugía Plástica Esencial. Hospital Clinico Universidad De Chile, 2005, ch. Úlceras por presión, pp 111–126

  9. Guadagnin R, Neves RD, Santana LA, Guilhem DB (2014) An image mining based approach to detect pressure ulcer stage. Pattern Recognit Image Anal 24(2):292–296. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661814020084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beal ME, Smith K (2016) Inpatient pressure ulcer prevalence in an acute care hospital using evidence-based practice. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs 13(2):112–117. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorileo AG, Frade MAC, Rangayyan RM, Azevedo-Marques PM (2010) Segmentation and analysis of the tissue composition of dermatological ulcers. In: CCECE 2010, pp 1–4

  12. Veredas F, Mesa H, Morente L (2010) Binary tissue classification on wound images with neural networks and bayesian classifiers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(2):410–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Azevedo-Marques PM, Pereira SM, Frade MAC, Rangayyan RM (2013) Segmentation of dermatological ulcers using clustering of color components. In: 2013 26th IEEE Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering (CCECE) , pp 1–4

  14. Veredas FJ, Luque-Baena RM, Martín-Santos FJ, Morilla-Herrera JC, Morente L (2015) Wound image evaluation with machine learning. Neurocomputing 164:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz DP, Sierra-Sosa D, Zapirain BG (2017) Pressure ulcer image segmentation technique through synthetic frequencies generation and contrast variation using toroidal geometry. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 16:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang C, Yan X, Smith M, Kochhar K, Rubin M, Warren SM, Wrobel J, Lee H (2015 ) A unified framework for automatic wound segmentation and analysis with deep convolutional neural networks. In: 2015 37th annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), pp 2415–2418

  17. Kawahara J, Hamarneh G (2016) Multi-resolution-Tract CNN with hybrid pretrained and skin-lesion trained layers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 164–171

    Google Scholar 

  18. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, Thrun S (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542(7639):115–118. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Soliman A, Khalifa F, Elnakib A, El-Ghar MA, Dunlap N, Wang B, Gimel’farb G, Keynton R, El-Baz A (2017) Accurate lungs segmentation on CT chest images by adaptive appearance-guided shape modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(1):263– 276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindeberg T (2011) Generalized Gaussian scale-space axiomatics comprising linear scale-space, affine scale-space and spatio-temporal scale-space. J Math Imaging Vis 40(1):36–81. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-010-0242-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamnitsas K, Ledig C, Newcombe VF, Simpson JP, Kane AD, Menon DK, Rueckert D, Glocker B (2017) Efficient multi-scale 3d {CNN} with fully connected {CRF} for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Med Image Anal 36:61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Baz A, Elnakib A, Khalifa F, El-Ghar MA, McClure P, Soliman A, Gimelrfarb G (2012) Precise segmentation of 3-d magnetic resonance angiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(7):2019–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Webb AR, Copsey KD (2011) Statistical pattern recognition, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas S (2017) Medetec wound database, http://www.medetec.co.uk/files/medetec-image-databases.html

  25. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26(3):297–302. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1932409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Powers DMW (2011) Evaluation: from precision, recall and f-measure to roc, informedness, markedness & correlation. J Mach Learn Technol 2(1):37–63

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang Y, Huang S (2007) Image segmentation by fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm with a novel penalty term. Computing and informatics 26:17–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9 (1):62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Dr. Georgy Gimel’farb, Department of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, for his help in revising the paper. In addition, the authors want to thank Sofia Zahia, Connor Burns, and Daniel Sierra-Sosa for their support in summarizing the related work and preparing the masks for the GT images.

Funding

The grants that have contributed with partial funding of the study are IT − 905 − 16 to eVIDA research group from the Basque Government, JC2015 − 00305 Josè Castillejo Research Stay Grant from the Spanish Ministry, and ACM2017_09 from the University of Deusto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayman El-Baz.

Additional information

The first and second authors contributed equally to this work and shared the first authorship.

The third and fourth authors are sharing the senior authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Zapirain, B., Elmogy, M., El-Baz, A. et al. Classification of pressure ulcer tissues with 3D convolutional neural network. Med Biol Eng Comput 56, 2245–2258 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1835-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1835-y

Keywords

Navigation