Abstract
To date, standard methods for assessing the severity of chest wall deformities are mostly linked to X-ray and CT scans. However, the use of radiations limits their use when there is a need to monitor the development of the pathology over time. This is particularly important when dealing with patients suffering from Pectus Carinatum, whose treatment mainly requires the use of corrective braces and a systematic supervision. In recent years, the assessment of severity of chest deformities by means of radiation-free devices became increasingly popular but not yet adopted as standard clinical practice. The present study aims to define an objective measure by defining a severity index (named External Pectus Carinatum Index) used to monitor the course of the disease during treatment. Computed on the optical acquisition of the patients’ chest by means of an appositely devised, fast and easy-to-use, body scanner, the proposed index has been validated on a sample composed of a control group and a group of Pectus Carinatum patients. The index proved to be reliable and accurate in the characterization of the pathology, enabling the definition of a threshold that allows to distinguish the cases of patients with PC from those of healthy subjects.

Graphical abstract







Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nuss D, Kelly RE (2014) The minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 19:324–347. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.OPTECHSTCVS.2014.10.003
Goretsky MJ, Kelly RE, Croitoru D, Nuss D (2004) Chest wall anomalies: pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum. Adolesc Med Clin 15:455–471
Park CH, Kim TH, Haam SJ, Jeon I, Lee S (2014) The etiology of pectus carinatum involves overgrowth of costal cartilage and undergrowth of ribs. J Pediatr Surg 49:1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPEDSURG.2014.02.044
(2012) American Pediatric Surgical Association Pectus Carinatum Guideline
Lain A, Garcia L, Gine C, Tiffet O, Lopez M (2017) New Methods for Imaging Evaluation of Chest Wall Deformities. Front Pediatr 5:257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2017.00257
Uccheddu F, Ghionzoli M, Volpe Y, Servi M, Furferi R, Governi L, Facchini F, Lo Piccolo R, McGreevy KS, Martin A, Carfagni M, Messineo A (2018) A novel objective approach to the external measurement of pectus excavatum severity by means of an optical device. Ann Thorac Surg 106:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2018.02.024
Egan JC, DuBois JJ, Morphy M et al (2000) Compressive orthotics in the treatment of asymmetric pectus carinatum: a preliminary report with an objective radiographic marker. J Pediatr Surg 35:1183–1186
Stephenson JT, Du Bois J (2008) Compressive orthotic bracing in the treatment of pectus carinatum: the use of radiographic markers to predict success. J Pediatr Surg 43:1776–1780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.03.049
Kim HC, Park HJ, Ham SY, Nam KW, Choi SY, Oh JS, Choi H, Jeong GS, Park SW, Kim MG, Sun K (2008) Development of automatized new indices for radiological assessment of chest-wall deformity and its quantitative evaluation. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:815–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0367-2
Kim HC, Park HJ, Nam KW, Kim SM, Choi EJ, Jin S, Lee JJ, Park SW, Choi H, Kim MG (2010) Fully automatic initialization method for quantitative assessment of chest-wall deformity in funnel chest patients. Med Biol Eng Comput 48:589–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0612-3
Kim HC, Choi H, Jin SO, Lee JJ, Nam KW, Kim IY, Nam KC, Park HJ, Lee KH, Kim MG (2013) New computerized indices for quantitative evaluation of depression and asymmetry in patients with Chest Wall deformities. Artif Organs 37:712–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12085
Kim HC, Park MS, Lee SK, Nam KC, Park HJ, Kim MG, Song JJ, Choi H (2015) Normalized mean shapes and reference index values for computerized quantitative assessment indices of Chest Wall deformities. J Korean Phys Soc 67:1868–1875. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.1868
Ewert F, Syed J, Wagner S, Besendoerfer M, Carbon RT, Schulz-Drost S (2017) Does an external chest wall measurement correlate with a CT-based measurement in patients with chest wall deformities? J Pediatr Surg 52:1583–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.04.011
Poncet P, Kravarusic D, Richart T, Evison R, Ronsky JL, Alassiri A, Sigalet D (2007) Clinical impact of optical imaging with 3-D reconstruction of torso topography in common anterior chest wall anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 42:898–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.12.070
Open source drivers for the kinect for windows v2 device. https://github.com/OpenKinect/libfreenect2. Accessed 19 Jun 2018
Gonzalez-Jorge H, Rodríguez-Gonzálvez P, Martínez-Sánchez J, González-Aguilera D, Arias P, Gesto M, Díaz-Vilariño L (2015) Metrological comparison between Kinect I and Kinect II sensors. Measurement 70:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2015.03.042
Kuru P, Cakiroglu A, Er A, Ozbakir H, Cinel AE, Cangut B, Iris M, Canbaz B, Pıçak E, Yuksel M (2016) Pectus excavatum and pectus Carinatum: associated conditions, family history, and postoperative patient satisfaction. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49:29–34. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.1.29
Glinkowski W, Sitnik R, Witkowski M, Kocoń H, Bolewicki P, Górecki A (2009) Method of pectus excavatum measurement based on structured light technique. J Biomed Opt 14:044041. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3210782
Izenman AJ (2013) Linear discriminant analysis. Springer, New York, pp 237–280
Minitab. http://www.minitab.com/en-us/. Accessed 14 Jan 2019
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our utmost gratitude to Federico Tinti for his invaluable help with the whole process.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Servi, M., Buonamici, F., Furferi, R. et al. Pectus Carinatum: a non-invasive and objective measurement of severity. Med Biol Eng Comput 57, 1727–1735 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-01993-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-01993-0