Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Single channel surface electromyogram deconvolution to explore motor unit discharges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interference surface electromyogram (EMG) reflects many bioelectric properties of active motor units (MU), which are however difficult to estimate due to the asynchronous summation of their discharges. This paper introduces a deconvolution technique to estimate the cumulative firings of MUs. Tests in simulations show that the power spectral density of the estimated MU firings has a low-frequency peak corresponding to the mean firing rate of MUs in the detection volume of the recording system, weighted by the amplitudes of MU action potentials. The peak increases in amplitude and its centroid shifts to a higher frequency when MU synchronization is simulated (mainly due to the shift of discharges of large MUs). The peak is found even at high force levels, when such a contribution does not emerge from the EMG. This result is also confirmed in preliminary applications to experimental data. Moreover, the simulated cumulative firings of MUs are estimated with a correlation above 90% (considering frequency contributions up to 150 Hz), for all force levels. The method requires a single EMG channel, thus being feasible even in applied studies using simple recording systems. It may open many potential applications, e.g., in the study of the modulation of MU firing rate induced by either fatigue or pathology and in coherency analysis.

Examples of application of the deconvolution (Deconv) algorithm and comparison with the cumulative firings and the cumulated weighted firings (CWF, i.e., each firing pattern is weighted by the root mean squared amplitude of the corresponding MU action potential). Portions of data are shown on the left, the power spectral densities (PSD) on the right (Welch method applied to 3 s of data, sub-epochs of 0.5 s, mean value removed from each of them, 50% of overlap). A) Simulated signal (50% of maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) with random MU firings. B) Simulated signal (50% MVC) with a level of synchronization equal to 10%. C) Experimental data from vastus medialis at 40% MVC (data decomposed by the algorithm of Holobar and Zazula, IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. 2007; PSD of the cumulated firings almost identical to that of CWF, as few MUs were identified).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker SN, Kilner JM, Pinches EM, Lemon RN (1999) The role of synchrony and oscillations in the motor output. Exp Brain Res 128(1-2):109–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basmajian J, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive: Their function revealed by electromyography, 5th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker S, von Werder SCFA, Lassek AK, Disselhorst-Klug C (2019) Time-frequency coherence of categorized sEMG data during dynamic contractions of biceps, triceps, and brachioradialis as an approach for spasticity detection. Med Biol Eng Comput. in press

  4. Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Burrus CS Iterative reweighted least squares. OpenStax CNX. Available online: http://cnx.org/contents/92b90377-2b34-49e4-b26f-7fe572db78a1@12

  6. Chen C, Chai G, Guo W, Sheng X, Farina D, Zhu X (2019) Prediction of finger kinematics from discharge timings of motor units: implications for intuitive control of myoelectric prostheses. J Neural Eng 16 (2):026005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Contessa P, Adam A, De Luca CJ (1985) Motor unit control and force fluctuation during fatigue. J Appl Physiol 107(1):235–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Contessa P, De Luca CJ (2013) Neural control of muscle force: indications from a simulation model. J Neurophysiol 109:1548–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Conway BA, Halliday DM, Farmer SF, Shahani U, Maas P, Weir AI, Rosenberg JR (1995) Synchronization between motor cortex and spinal motoneuronal pool during the performance of a maintained motor task in man. J Physiol 489(Pt 3):917–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Craven D, McGinley B, Kilmartin L, Glavin M, Jones E (2015) Compressed sensing for bioelectric signals: a review. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 19:529–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Luca CJ, Erim Z (1994) Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force. Trends Neurosci 17:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Luca CJ, Erim Z (2002) Common drive in motor units of a synergistic muscle pair. J Neurophysiol 87 (4):2200–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Luca CJ, Adam A, Wotiz R, Gilmore LD, Nawab SH (2006) Decomposition of surface EMG signals. J Neurophysiol 96:1646–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Souza LML, Cabral HV, de Oliveira LF, Vieira TM (2018) Motor units in vastus lateralis and in different vastus medialis regions show different firing properties during low-level, isometric knee extension contraction. Hum Mov Sci 58:307–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Enck P, Franz H, Davico E, Mastrangelo F, Mesin L, Merletti R (2010) Repeatability of innervation zone identification in the external anal sphincter muscle. Neurourol Urodyn 29(3):449–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2004) The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol (1985) 96(4):1486–95. Review

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2014) The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. J Appl Physiol (1985) 117(11):1215–30. Review

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Herda TJ, Siedlik JA, Trevino MA, Cooper MA, Weir JP (2015) Motor unit control strategies of endurance- versus resistance-trained individuals. Muscle Nerve 52:832–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holobar A, Zazula D (2007) Multichannel blind source separation using convolution kernel compensation. IEEE Trans Sig Proc 55:4487–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu X, Suresh AK, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL (2016) Altered motor unit discharge patterns in paretic muscles of stroke survivors assessed using surface electromyography. J Neural Eng 13(4):046025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lago PJ, Jones NB (1981) Low-frequency spectral analysis of the e.m.g. Med Biol Eng Comput 19(6):779–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mesin L, Cocito D (2007) A new method for the estimation of motor nerve conduction block. Clin Neurophysiol 118(4):730–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mesin L, Damiano L, Farina D (2007) Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from simulated surface EMG in pinnate muscles. J Neurosci Methods 160:327–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mesin L, Merletti R, Vieira TM (2011) Insights gained into the interpretation of surface electromyograms from the gastrocnemius muscles: A simulation study. J Biomech 44(6):1096–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mesin L, Dardanello D, Rainoldi A, Boccia G (2016) Motor unit firing rates and synchronisation affect the fractal dimension of simulated surface electromyogram during isometric/isotonic contraction of vastus lateralis muscle. Med Eng Phys 38(12):1530–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mesin L (2019) Separation of interference surface electromyogram into propagating and non-propagating components. Biomed Signal Process Control 52:238–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mesin L (2019) Non-propagating components of surface electromyogram reflect motor unit firing rates, submitted to IEEE Access

  28. Myers LJ, Lowery M, O’Malley M, Vaughan CL, Heneghan C, St Clair Gibson A, Harley YX, Sreenivasan R (2003) Rectification and non-linear pre-processing of EMG signals for cortico-muscular analysis. J Neurosci Methods 124(2):157–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nawab SH, Chang SS, De Luca CJ (2010) High-yield decomposition of surface EMG signals. Clin Neurophysiol 121(10):1602–15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Neto OP, Christou EA (2010) Rectification of the EMG signal impairs the identification of oscillatory input to the muscle. J Neurophysiol 103(2):1093–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Piitulainen H, Botter A, Bourguignon M, Jousmäki V, Hari R (2015) Spatial variability in cortex-muscle coherence investigated with magnetoencephalography and high-density surface electromyography. J Neurophysiol 114(5):2843–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Boxtel A, Schomaker LR (1983) Motor unit firing rate during static contraction indicated by the surface EMG power spectrum. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 30(9):601–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weytjens JL, van Steenberghe D (1984) The effects of motor unit synchronization on the power spectrum of the electromyogram. Biol Cybern 51(2):71–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Experimental data were provided by LISiN (Laboratorio di Ingegneria del Sistema Neuromuscolare e della riabilitazione motoria, Turin, Italy). Decomposition of experimental EMGs was performed by A. Botter and T.M. Vieira.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mathematical Biology and Physiology, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, 10129, Italy

    Luca Mesin

Authors
  1. Luca Mesin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Mesin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesin, L. Single channel surface electromyogram deconvolution to explore motor unit discharges. Med Biol Eng Comput 57, 2045–2054 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-02010-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-02010-0

Keywords