Abstract
During thyroid ultrasound diagnosis, radiologists add markers such as pluses or crosses near a nodule’s edge to indicate the location of a nodule. For computer-aided detection, deep learning models achieve classification, segmentation, and detection by learning the thyroid’s texture in ultrasound images. Experiments show that manual markers are strong prior knowledge for data-driven deep learning models, which interferes with the judgment mechanism of computer-aided detection systems. Aiming at this problem, this paper proposes cascade marker removal algorithm for thyroid ultrasound images to eliminate the interference of manual markers. The algorithm consists of three parts. First, in order to highlight marked features, the algorithm extracts salient features in thyroid ultrasound images through feature extraction module. Secondly, mask correction module eliminates the interference of other features besides markers’ features. Finally, the marker removal module removes markers without destroying the semantic information in thyroid ultrasound images. Experiments show that our algorithm enables classification, segmentation, and object detection models to focus on the learning of pathological tissue features. At the same time, compared with mainstream image inpainting algorithms, our algorithm shows better performance on thyroid ultrasound images. In summary, our algorithm is of great significance for improving the stability and performance of computer-aided detection systems.

During thyroid ultrasound diagnosis, doctors add markers such as pluses or crosses near nodule's edge to indicate the location of nodule. Manual markers are strong prior knowledge for data-driven deep learning models, which interferes the judgment mechanism of computer-aided diagnosis system based on deep learning. Markers make models overfit the specific labeling forms easily, and performs poorly on unmarked thyroid ultrasound images. Aiming at this problem, this paper proposes a cascade marker removal algorithm to eliminate the interference of manual markers. Our algorithm make deep learning models pay attention on nodules’ features of thyroid ultrasound images, which make computer-aided diagnosis system performs good in both marked imaging and unmarked imaging.










Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badrinarayanan V, Kendall A, Cipolla R (2017) SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 39(12):2481–2495
Barnes C, Shechtman E, Finkelstein A, Goldman DB (2009) Patchmatch: a randomized correspondence algorithm for structural image editing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc SIGGRAPH) 28(3)
Dekel T, Rubinstein M, Liu C, Freeman WT (2017) On the effectiveness of visible watermarks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 2146–2154
Everingham M, Van Gool L, Williams CK, Winn J, Zisserman A (2007) The pascal visual object classes challenge 2007 (voc2007) results
Geirhos R, Rubisch P, Michaelis C, Bethge M, Wichmann FA, Brendel W (2018) Imagenet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness. arXiv:1811.12231
Girshick R (2015) Fast R-CNN. In: The IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV)
Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J (2014) Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)
Grant EG, Tessler FN, Hoang JK, Langer JE, Beland MD, Berland LL, Cronan JJ, Desser TS, Frates MC, Hamper UM et al (2015) Thyroid ultrasound reporting lexicon: white paper of the ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) committee. J Am Coll Radiol 12(12):1272–1279
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778
Hegedüs L (2004) The thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med 351(17):1764–1771
Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ (2017) Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 4700–4708
Iizuka S, Simo-Serra E, Ishikawa H (2017) Globally and locally consistent image completion. ACM Trans Graph (ToG) 36(4):107
Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks Advances in neural information processing systems 25(2)
Lin TY, Dollar P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S (2017) Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In: The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)
Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollar P (2017) Focal loss for dense object detection. In: The IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV)
Liu G, Reda FA, Shih KJ, Wang TC, Tao A, Catanzaro B (2018) Image inpainting for irregular holes using partial convolutions. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pp 85–100
Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Szegedy C, Reed S, Fu CY, Berg AC (2016) Ssd: single shot multibox detector. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, New York, pp 21–37
Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. pp 3431–3440
Luong MT, Pham H, Manning CD (2015) Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. arXiv:1508.04025
Mandel SJ (2004) A 64-year-old woman with a thyroid nodule. Jama 292(21):2632–2642
Neubeck A, Gool LJV (2006) Efficient non-maximum suppression. In: 18th International conference on pattern recognition (ICPR 2006), 20-24 august 2006, Hong Kong, China
Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A (2016) You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. In: The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)
Redmon J, Farhadi A (2017) Yolo9000: better, faster, stronger. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7263–7271
Redmon J, Farhadi A (2018) Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv:1804.02767
Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J (2015) Faster R-CNN:towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 91–99
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation pp 234–241
RUMELHART DE (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 23
Shelhamer E, Long J, Darrell T Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–9
Telea A (2004) An image inpainting technique based on the fast marching method. J Graph Tools 9(1):23–34
Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, Cronan JJ, Beland MD, Desser TS, Frates MC et al (2017) ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (ti-rads): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee. J Am Coll Radiol 14(5):587–595
Tunbridge W, Evered D, Hall R, Appleton D, Brewis M, Clark F, Evans JG, Young E, Bird T, Smith P (1977) The spectrum of thyroid disease in a community: the Whickham Survey. Clinical Endocrinology 7(6):481–493
Vander JB, Gaston EA, Dawber TR (1968) The significance of nontoxic thyroid nodules: final report of a 15-year study of the incidence of thyroid malignancy. Annals Intern Med 69(3):537–540
Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need arxiv: Computation and Language
Wang F, Jiang M, Qian C, Yang S, Li C, Zhang H, Wang X, Tang X (2017) Residual attention network for image classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 3156–3164
Zhou B, Khosla A, Lapedriza A, Oliva A, Torralba A (2016) Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2921–2929
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61877043, No. 61976155), Major Scientific and Technological Projects for A New Generation of Artificial Intelligence of Tianjin (Grant No. 18ZXZNSY00300).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ying, X., Zhang, Y., Yu, M. et al. Cascade marker removal algorithm for thyroid ultrasound images. Med Biol Eng Comput 58, 2641–2656 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02216-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02216-7