Skip to main content
Log in

Image-based cell subpopulation identification through automated cell tracking, principal component analysis, and partitioning around medoids clustering

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vitro cell culture model systems often employ monocultures, despite the fact that cells generally exist in a diverse, heterogeneous microenvironment in vivo. In response, heterogeneous cultures are increasingly being used to study how cell phenotypes interact. However, the ability to accurately identify and characterize distinct phenotypic subpopulations within heterogeneous systems remains a major challenge. Here, we present the use of a computational, image analysis–based approach—comprising automated contour-based cell tracking for feature identification, principal component analysis for feature reduction, and partitioning around medoids for subpopulation characterization—to non-destructively and non-invasively identify functionally distinct cell phenotypic subpopulations from live-cell microscopy image data. Using a heterogeneous model system of endothelial and smooth muscle cells, we demonstrate that this approach can be applied to both mono and co-culture nuclear morphometric and motility data to discern cell phenotypic subpopulations. Morphometric clustering identified minimal difference in mono- versus co-culture, while motility clustering revealed that a portion of endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells adopt increased motility rates in co-culture that are not observed in monoculture. We anticipate that this approach using non-destructive and non-invasive imaging can be applied broadly to heterogeneous cell culture model systems to advance understanding of how heterogeneity alters cell phenotype.

This work presents a computational, image-analysis-based approach—comprising automated contour-based cell tracking for feature identification, principle component analysis for feature reduction, and partitioning around medoids for subpopulation characterization—to non-destructively and non-invasively identify functionally distinct cell phenotypic subpopulations from live-cell microscopy image data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used in the current study are available by reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Casbas-Hernandez, P., J.M. Fleming, and M.A. Troester, Gene expression analysis of in vitro cocultures to study interactions between breast epithelium and stroma. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2011: p. 12.

  2. Friedl P, Gilmour D (2009) Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(7):445–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duell, B.L., et al., Epithelial cell coculture models for studying infectious diseases: benefits and limitations. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2011: p. 9.

  4. Xin X et al (2019) 3D cell coculture tumor model: a promising approach for future cancer drug discovery. Process Biochem 78:148–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rossi G, Manfrin A, Lutolf MP (2018) Progress and potential in organoid research. Nat Rev Genet 19(11):671–687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duraiyan J et al (2012) Applications of immunohistochemistry. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences 4(Suppl 2):S307–S309

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Matos LL et al (2010) Immunohistochemistry as an important tool in biomarkers detection and clinical practice. Biomarker Insights 2010(5):9–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giulietti A et al (2001) An overview of real-time quantitative PCR: applications to quantify cytokine gene expression. Methods 25(4):386–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bustin SA (2002) Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. J Mol Endocrinol 29(1):23–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ansari AM et al (2016) Cellular GFP toxicity and immunogenicity: potential confounders in in vivo cell tracking experiments. Stem Cell Rev Rep 12(5):553–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen J et al (2019) Prognostic molecular markers in pediatric liver disease - are there any? BBA-Mol Basis Dis 1865(3):577–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Metze K, Adam R, Florindo JB (2019) The fractal dimension of chromatin - a potential molecular marker for carcinogenesis, tumor progression and prognosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 19(4):299–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, R.M., et al., Automated, contour-based tracking and analysis of cell behaviour over long time scales in environments of varying complexity and cell density. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2014. 11(97).

  14. Wang J et al (2017) On-command on/off switching of progenitor cell and cancer cell polarized motility and aligned morphology via a cytocompatible shape memory polymer scaffold. Biomaterials 140:150–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, J., et al., Shape memory activation can affect cell seeding of shape memory polymer scaffolds designed for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine, 2017. 28(10).

  16. Gu H et al (2016) How Escherichia coli lands and forms cell clusters on a surface: a new role of surface topography. Sci Rep 6:29516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Song F et al (2017) How bacteria respond to material stiffness during attachment: a role of Escherichia coil flagellar motility. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(27):22176–22184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brasch ME et al (2019) Nuclear position relative to the Golgi body and nuclear orientation are differentially responsive indicators of cell polarized motility. PLoS One 14(2):e0211408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Passucci G et al (2019) Identifying the mechanism for superdiffusivity in mouse fibroblast motility. PLoS Comput Biol 15(2):e1006732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Benhamou S (2004) How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal’s path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? J Theor Biol 229(2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Codling EA, Plank MJ, Benhamou S (2008) Random walk models in biology. J R Soc Interface 5(25):813–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gorelik R, Gautreau A (2014) Quantitative and unbiased analysis of directional persistence in cell migration. Nat Protoc 9(8):1931–1943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Šolc K (1971) Shape of a random-flight chain. J Chem Phys 55(1):335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM (2005) How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput Stat Data Anal 49(4):974–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lê S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 1(1):2008

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rousseeuw PJ (1987) Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math 20(C):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hennig C, Liao TF (2013) How to find an appropriate clustering for mixed-type variables with application to socio-economic stratification. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser C (Appl Stat) 62(3):309–369

    Google Scholar 

  28. Elleithy, K. and T. Sobh, Innovations and advances in computer, information, systems sciences, and engineering. Vol. 152. 2012: Springer Science & Business Media.

  29. Forster B et al (2004) Complex wavelets for extended depth-of-field: a new method for the fusion of multichannel microscopy images. Microsc Res Tech 65(1–2):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang HQ et al (2007) Coculture with endothelial cells enhances vascular smooth muscle cell adhesion and spreading via activation of beta(1)-integrin and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt. Eur J Cell Biol 86(1):51–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams C, Wick TM (2005) Endothelial cell-smooth muscle cell co-culture in a perfusion bioreactor system. Ann Biomed Eng 33(7):920–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jackson DA (1993) Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74(8):2204–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zwick WR, Velicer WF (1986) Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bull 99(3):432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tibshirani R, Walther G, Hastie T (2001) Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 63(2):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Samet H (1984) The quadtree and related hierarchical data structures. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 16(2):187–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kohonen T (2013) Essentials of the self-organizing map. Neural Netw 37:52–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ivanenkov YA et al (2009) Computational mapping tools for drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 14(15–16):767–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schneider P, Tanrikulu Y, Schneider G (2009) Self-organizing maps in drug discovery: compound library design, scaffold-hopping, repurposing. Curr Med Chem 16(3):258–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Beckonert O et al (2003) Visualizing metabolic changes in breast-cancer tissue using H-1-NMR spectroscopy and self-organizing maps. NMR Biomed 16(1):1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Dr. M. Lisa Manning and Giuseppe Passucci for guidance on clustering methodologies and techniques. Additional thanks to Dr. Eric Finkelstein for providing initial cell sources and guidance on endothelial and smooth muscle cell culture.

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under a collaborative award to J.H.H. (CMMI-1334611) and supported by an IGERT fellowship under NSF-DGE 1068780 to M.E.B. Additional undergraduate research funding from the Ronald E. McNair Program, the Renée Crown University Honors Program, Donofrio Scholars Program, and LSAMP program was provided to A.N.P to sponsor completion of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MEB, ANP, and JHH conceived of the final concept. MEB and ANP designed and executed cell experiments. Preliminary computational methodology was optimized by ANP. Final computational methodology and results executed and isolated by MEB. MEB, ANP, and JHH wrote, edited, and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James H. Henderson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (2.62 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brasch, M.E., Peña, A.N. & Henderson, J.H. Image-based cell subpopulation identification through automated cell tracking, principal component analysis, and partitioning around medoids clustering. Med Biol Eng Comput 59, 1851–1864 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02418-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02418-7

Keywords