Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of variation factors in EMG measurement of swallowing: instruction can improve EMG reproducibility

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variability in swallowing electromyography (EMG) has been reported to occur due to individual differences, even in studies with appropriate control of factors affecting EMG such as food type, properties, and posture. The increased variability broadens the confidence intervals of measures obtained from EMG, such as time and amplitude, and makes it difficult to detect differences in muscle activity. This makes it impossible to detect slight changes in swallowing function at an early stage, which is required for clinical examination. In this study, we focused on the tipper type and dipper type of oral swallows, which differ in the timing of muscle activity. The frequency of occurrence of both types varies between participants, and both types could occur in the same participant. In this study, we measured swallowing EMG wherein participants were instructed to swallow with a tipper and a dipper. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the between-participant duration between these two types of swallows. Within-participant variability was significantly lower in the tipper-dipper instruction condition compared to the baseline condition, which assumed a mixture of tipper-dipper swallowing. These results demonstrate that instructions on swallowing method are effective in improving the reproducibility of EMG.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaiman M, Eviatar E (2009) Surface electromyography as a screening method for evaluation of dysphagia and odynophagia. Head Face Med 5(9):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaiman M (2007) Standardization of surface electromyography utilized to evaluate patients with dysphagia. Head Face Med 3(26):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-3-26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Audag N, Goubau C, Toussaint M, Reychler G (2019) Screening and evaluation tools of dysphagia in adults with neuromuscular diseases: a systematic review. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 10:2040622318821622. https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622318821622

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Archer SK, Garrod R, Hart N, Miller S (2013) Dysphagia in duchenne muscular dystrophy assessed objectively by surface electromyography. Dysphagia 28(2):188–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9429-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakai K, Nakayama E, Rogus-Pulia N, Takehisa T, Takehisa Y, Urayama KY, Takahashi O (2020) Submental muscle activity and its role in diagnosing sarcopenic dysphagia. Clin Interv Aging 15:1991–1999. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S278793

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cosentino G, Alfonsi E, Mainardi L, Alvisi E, Brighina F, Valentino F, Fierro B, Sandrini G, Bertino G, Berlangieri M et al (2017) The importance of the reproducibility of oropharyngeal swallowing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. An electrophysiological study. Clin Neurophysiol 128(5):792–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.02.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ayuse T, Ayuse T, Ishitobi S, Kurata S, Sakamoto E, Okayasu I, Oi K (2006) Effect of reclining and chin-tuck position on the coordination between respiration and swallowing. J Oral Rehabil 33(6):402–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01586.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inagaki D, Miyaoka Y, Ashida I, Ueda K, Yamada Y (2007) Influences of body posture on duration of oral swallowing in normal young adults. J Oral Rehabil 34(6):414–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01737.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ono T, Iwata H, Hori K, Tamine K, Kondoh J, Hamanaka S, Maeda Y (2009) Evaluation of tongue-, jaw-, and swallowing-related muscle coordination during voluntarily triggered swallowing. Int J Prosthodont 22(5):493–498

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer PM, Luschei ES, Jaffe D, Mcculloch TM (1999) Contributions of individual muscles to the submental surface electromyogram during swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42(6):1378–1391. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4206.1378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaiman M, Eviatar E, Segal S (2004) Evaluation of normal deglutition with the help of rectified surface electromyography records. Dysphagia 19(2):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-003-0504-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lininger M, Riemann BL (2016) Statistical primer for athletic trainers: Using confidence intervals and effect sizes to evaluate clinical meaningfulness. J Athl Train 51(12):1045–1048. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Aydogdu I, Kiylioglu N, Tarlaci S, Tanriverdi Z, Alpaydin S, Acarer A, Baysal L, Arpaci E, Yuceyar N, Secil Y et al (2015) Diagnostic value of “dysphagia limit” for neurogenic dysphagia: 17 years of experience in 1278 adults. Clin Neurophysiol 126(3):634–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.06.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Inagaki D, Miyaoka Y, Ashida I, Yamada Y (2008) Influence of food properties and body posture on durations of swallowing-related muscle activities. J Oral Rehabil 35(9):656–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01866.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Inagaki D, Miyaoka Y, Ashida I, Yamada Y (2009) Influence of food properties and body position on swallowing-related muscle activity amplitude. J Oral Rehabil 36(3):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01927.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakuma T, Kida I (2010) Relationship between ease of swallowing and deglutition-related muscle activity in various postures. J Oral Rehabil 37(8):583–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02084.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kohyama K, Sawada H, Nonaka M, Kobori C, Hayakawa F, Sasaki T (2007) Textural evaluation of rice cake by chewing and swallowing measurements on human subjects. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71(2):358–365. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.60276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Inui R, Mori S, Nakajima T, Lee H, Nishimori T, Tabira K (2012) Influence of neck position on the activity of pharyngeal and neck muscles during swallowing—examination by surface electromyography―. Jpn J Dysphagia Rehabil 16(3):269–275. https://doi.org/10.32136/jsdr.16.3_269 (in Japanese)

  19. Miralles R, Palazzi C, Ormeño G, Giannini R, Verdugo F, Valenzuela S, Santander H (1998) Body position effects on emg activity of sternocleidomastoid and masseter muscles in healthy subjects. Cranio 16(2):90–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1998.11746045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lof GL, Robbins J (1990) Test–retest variability in normal swallowing. Dysphagia 4(4):236–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Costa MM (2010) Videofluoroscopy: the gold standard exam for studying swallowing and its dysfunction. Arq Gastroenterol 47(4):327–328. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032010000400001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gramigna GD (2006) How to perform video-fluoroscopic swallowing studies. GI Motility online

  23. Martin-Harris B, Jones B (2008) The videofluorographic swallowing study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 19(4):769–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2008.06.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohmori N, Chikai M, Endo H, Ino S (2017) Experimental investigation of variability in swallowing measurement Proceedings of the human interface symposium, vol 2017 5Tp3–1 (in Japanese)

  25. Dodds WJ, Taylor AJ, Stewart ET, Kern MK, Logemann JA, Cook IJ (1989) Tipper and dipper types of oral swallows. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153(6):1197–1199. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.153.6.1197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cook IJ, Dodds WJ, Dantas RO, Kern MK, Massey BT, Shaker R, Hogan WJ (1989) Timing of videofluoroscopic, manometric events, and bolus transit during the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Dysphagia 4(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sugino S, Taniguchi H, Tsukada T, Ootaki S, Kajii Y, Yamada Y, Inoue M (2007) Effects of food consistency and subject’s posture on the electromyographic activity in the genioglossus muscle in humans. J Jpn Soc Stomatognath Funct 14(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.7144/sgf.14.13(inJapanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Y, Leow LP, Yoon WL, Rickard Liow SJ, Chua KC (2012) Relationship between age and drinking instructions on the modification of drinking behavior. Dysphagia 27(2):210–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9355-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Perlman AL, Palmer PM, Mcculloch TM (1985) Vandaele DJ (1999) Electromyographic activity from human laryngeal, pharyngeal, and submental muscles during swallowing. J Appl Physiol 86(5):1663–1669. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Koyama Y, Ohmori N, Momose H, Kondo E, Yamada SI, Kurita H (2021) Detection of swallowing disorders using a multiple channel surface electromyography sheet: a preliminary study. J Dent Sci 16(1):160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zaretsky E, Pluschinski P, Sader R, Birkholz P, Neuschaefer-Rube C, Hey C (2017) Identification of the most significant electrode positions in electromyographic evaluation of swallowing-related movements in humans. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(2):989–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4288-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yokoyama M, Michiwaki Y, Takahashi K, Ozawa M, Akizuki A, Michi K (2000) Analysis of swallowing function using videofluorographic images-basic study for the time analysis-. J Jpn Stomatol Soc 49(1):16–24. https://doi.org/10.11277/stomatology1952.49.16 (in Japanese)

  33. Hori K, Taniguchi H, Hayashi H, Magara J, Minagi Y, Li Q, Ono T, Inoue M (2013) Role of tongue pressure production in oropharyngeal swallow biomechanics. Physiol Rep 1(6):e00167. https://doi.org/10.1002/phy2.167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nakane A, Tohara H, Ouchi Y, Goto S, Uematsu H (2006) Videofluoroscopic kinesiologic analysis of swallowing: defining a standard plane. J Med Dent Sci 53(1):7–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ohmori N, Murasawa C, Aizawa J, Momose H, Koyama Y, Kurita H, Yoshida H, Kamijo M (2017) Noise reduction in swallowing muscle activity measurement based on mixture Gaussian distribution model. J Adv Comp Intell Intell Inform 21(1):109–118. https://doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2017.p0109

  36. Kouchi M, Mochimaru M (2005) Aist anthropometric database. Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci Technol H16PRO 287

  37. Halaki M, Gi K (2012) Normalization of emg signals: to normalize or not to normalize and what to normalize to? In: Comp Intell Electromyogr Anal Perspect Curr Appl Future Chall 175–194

  38. Kuiken TA, Lowery MM, Stoykov NS (2003) The effect of subcutaneous fat on myoelectric signal amplitude and cross-talk. Prosthet Orthot Int 27(1):48–54. https://doi.org/10.3109/03093640309167976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sousa AS, Tavares JMR (2012) Surface electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: a review electromyography: new developments, procedures and applications, pp 85–102

  40. Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants who participated in the experiments. In addition, the authors wish to thank: Dr. Hidekazu Kaneko, who is a Senior Researcher at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology in Japan; Dr. Syuji Ishiguro, who is the Division Director of the Nagano Prefecture General Industrial Technology Center in Japan; and Dr. Yoshito Koyama and Dr. Hiroshi Kurita from Shinshu University in Japan for their valuable opinions. Finally, we would like to acknowledge Mr. Tomoki Sawano and Ms. Aasahi Koyama for their valuable research support.

Funding

This study was supported by the Strategic Information and Communications R&D Promotion Programme (SCOPE), the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Japan, and the JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP17H00755, 19K12887, 20H04567, and 20K11929.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuyuki Ohmori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The institutions of the authors (Nagano Prefecture and SKINOS) have patents that are issued and pending. The authors declare no competing interests other than the above.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 324 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohmori, N., Watanabe, S., Momose, H. et al. Investigation of variation factors in EMG measurement of swallowing: instruction can improve EMG reproducibility. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 2825–2840 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02590-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02590-4

Keywords