Skip to main content
Log in

Verifying a C-arm-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis protocol for assessing tibial implant movement in total knee arthroplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is the “gold standard” technique for measuring sub-millimetric relative motion between implant and bone to quantify post-operative implant migration over time. The vast majority of RSA studies addressing implant motion in knee replacements, however, have been conducted using expensive biplanar radiography systems and commercial software that are not readily available at many institutions. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of performing RSA using ordinary, readily available C-arm fluoroscopes and open-source software to assess tibial component migration.

We developed an assessment protocol using a Siemens Arcadis Orbic C-arm and the open-source XROMM software and evaluated its accuracy and precision through a series of phantom-based verification tests. The results were highly promising: accuracies were in the range of − 39 to 11 μm for translations and − 0.025 to 0.029° for rotations, while system precisions ranged between 16 to 27 μm for translations and 0.041 to 0.059° for rotations. This performance is comparable to specialized RSA systems reported in the literature. The proposed RSA protocol is therefore capable of accurately measuring the relative motion of knee replacement implants in phantom scenarios, which justifies further the development of the protocol towards use in prospective clinical assessments of new implant designs and surgical techniques.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 06 July 2022

    Springer Nature’s version of this paper was updated because page 9 of the PDF version has been relayout.

References

  1. Altilio R, Paoloni M, Panella M (2017) Selection of clinical features for pattern recognition applied to gait analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 55:685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1546-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amiri S, Anglin C, Agbanlog K, Masri BA, Wilson DR (2012) A model-free feature-based bi-planar RSA method for kinematic analysis of total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech Eng 134:031009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barré A, Aminian K (2018) Error performances of a model-based biplane fluoroscopic system for tracking knee prosthesis during treadmill gait task. Med Biol Eng Comput 56:307–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1680-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonanzinga T, Signorelli C, Bontempi M, Russo A, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Bragonzoni L (2016) Evaluation of RSA set-up from a clinical biplane fluoroscopy system for 3D joint kinematic analysis. Joints 4:121–125. https://doi.org/10.11138/jts/2016.4.2.121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brainerd EL, Baier DB, Gatesy SM, Hedrick TL, Metzger KA, Gilbert SL, Crisco JJ (2010) X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research. J Exp Zool Part Ecol Genet Physiol 313:262–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cross JA, McHenry BD, Molthen R, Exten E, Schmidt TG, Harris GF (2017) Biplane fluoroscopy for hindfoot motion analysis during gait: a model-based evaluation. Med Eng Phys 43:118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giphart JE, Zirker CA, Myers CA, Pennington WW, LaPrade RF (2012) Accuracy of a contour-based biplane fluoroscopy technique for tracking knee joint kinematics of different speeds. J Biomech 45:2935–2938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu C-P, Lin S-C, Shih K-S, Huang C-H, Lee C-H (2014) Predicting 3D pose in partially overlapped X-ray images of knee prostheses using model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). Med Biol Eng Comput 52:1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-014-1206-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. International Organization for Standardization (2013) ISO16087:2013(E) Implants for surgery — Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for the assessment of migration of orthopaedic implants. ISO.

  10. Ioppolo J, Börlin N, Bragdon C, Li M, Price R, Wood D, Malchau H, Nivbrant B (2007) Validation of a low-dose hybrid RSA and fluoroscopy technique: determination of accuracy, bias and precision. J Biomech 40:686–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jürgens-Lahnstein JH, Petersen ET, Laursen M, Hauskov Iversen C, Kaptein BL, Lindgren L, Stilling M (2021) Development, construction, and validation of a thinner uniplanar calibration cage for radiostereometry. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kedgley AE, Jenkyn TR (2009) RSA calibration accuracy of a fluoroscopy-based system using nonorthogonal images for measuring functional kinematics. Med Phys 36:3176–3180. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3147142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laende EK, Deluzio KJ, Hennigar AW, Dunbar MJ (2009) Implementation and validation of an implant-based coordinate system for RSA migration calculation. J Biomech 42:2387–2393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li G, Van de Velde SK, Bingham JT (2008) Validation of a non-invasive fluoroscopic imaging technique for the measurement of dynamic knee joint motion. J Biomech 41:1616–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nelissen RGHH, Pijls BG, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER (2011) RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 3):62–65. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parashin S, Gascoyne T, Zarrabian M (2020) A phantom and cadaveric study of radiostereometric analysis in posterior cervical and lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 20:1333–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pijls BG, Valstar ER, Nouta K-A, Plevier JW, Fiocco M, Middeldorp S, Nelissen RG (2012) Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 83:614–624. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747052

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Seehaus F, Emmerich J, Kaptein BL, Windhagen H, Hurschler C (2013) Dependence of model-based RSA accuracy on higher and lower implant surface model quality. Biomed Eng Online 12:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Selvik G (1989) Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 232:1–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Söderkvist I, Wedin PA (1993) Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. J Biomech 26:1473–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Valstar ER (2002) The use of roentgen stereophotogrammetry to study micromotion of orthopaedic implants. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 56:376–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Börlin N, Kärrholm J (2005) Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 76:563–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ward TR, Hussain MM, Pickering M, Perriman D, Burns A, Scarvell J, Smith PN (2019) Validation of a method to measure three-dimensional hip joint kinematics in subjects with femoroacetabular impingement. Hip International 31(1):133–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700019883548

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support from the Engineers in Scrubs program in funding this project through a fellowship award and facilities support from the Centre for Hip Health and Mobility. We would also like to thank researchers at the XROMM Technology Development Project for providing access to open-source RSA software, and Zimmer of Canada Ltd. for providing the total knee arthroplasty components.

Funding

This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research through a Collaborative Health Research Projects grant, Funding Reference Number 134758.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivian W. J. Chung.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, V.W.J., Newell, R., Kedgley, A. et al. Verifying a C-arm-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis protocol for assessing tibial implant movement in total knee arthroplasty. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 2389–2403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02594-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02594-0

Keywords

Navigation