Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosing growing pains in children by using machine learning: a cross-sectional multicenter study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Growing pains (GP) are the most common cause of recurrent musculoskeletal pain in children. There are no diagnostic criteria for GP. We aimed at analyzing GP-related characteristics and assisting GP diagnosis by using machine learning (ML). Children with GP and diseased controls were enrolled between February and August 2019. ML models were developed by using tenfold cross-validation to classify GP patients. A total of 398 patients with GP (F/M:1.3; median age 102 months) and 254 patients with other diseases causing limb pain were enrolled. The pain was bilateral (86.2%), localized in the lower extremities (89.7%), nocturnal (74%), and led to awakening at night (60.8%) in most GP patients. History of arthritis, trauma, morning stiffness, limping, limitation of activities, and school abstinence were more prevalent among controls than in GP patients (p = 0.016 for trauma; p < 0.001 for others). The experiments with different ML models revealed that the Random Forest algorithm had the best performance with 0.98 accuracy, 0.99 sensitivity, and 0.97 specificity for GP diagnosis. This is the largest cohort study of children with GP and the first study that attempts to diagnose GP by using ML techniques. Our ML model may be used to facilitate diagnosing GP.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data Availability

Python source codes and the pre-trained model are available at GitHub (https://github.com/fuatakal/GrowingPain). The entire dataset used for this study may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Uziel Y, Hashkes PJ (2007) Growing pains in children. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 5:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-5-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehman PJ, Carl RL (2017) Growing Pains. Sports. Health 9:132–138

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asadi-Pooya AA, Bordbar MR (2007) Are laboratory tests necessary in making the diagnosis of limb pains typical for growing pains in children? Pediatr Int 49:833–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowe RM, Hashkes PJ (2008) Growing pains: a noninflammatory pain syndrome of early childhood. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 4:542–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowyer SL, Hollister JR (1984) Limb pain in childhood. Pediatr Clin North Am 31:1053–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson H (1986) Growing pains. Pediatr Clin North Am 33:1365–1372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jordan MI, Mitchell TM (2015) Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349:255–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Topol EJ (2019) High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 25:44–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davenport T, Kalakota R (2019) The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J 6:94–98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I (2019) Machine learning in medicine. N Engl J Med 380:1347–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandit A, Radstake T (2020) Machine learning in rheumatology approaches the clinic. Nat Rev Rheumatol 16:69–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoel B (2020) Use of artificial intelligence in imaging in rheumatology - current status and future perspectives. RMD Open 6:e001063

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Eng SW, Duong TT, Rosenberg AM, Morris Q, Yeung RS, Reacch OUT, Consortia BR (2014) The biologic basis of clinical heterogeneity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 66:3463–3475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Orange DE, Agius P, DiCarlo EF, Robine N, Geiger H, Szymonifka J, McNamara M, Cummings R, Andersen KM, Mirza S, Figgie M, Ivashkiv LB, Pernis AB, Jiang CS, Frank MO, Darnell RB, Lingampali N, Robinson WH, Gravallese E, Accelerating medicines partnership in rheumatoid A, Lupus N, Bykerk VP, Goodman SM, Donlin LT (2018) Identification of three rheumatoid arthritis disease subtypes by machine learning integration of synovial histologic features and RNA sequencing data. Arthritis Rheumatol 70:690–701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Adamichou C, Genitsaridi I, Nikolopoulos D, Nikoloudaki M, Repa A, Bortoluzzi A, Fanouriakis A, Sidiropoulos P, Boumpas DT, Bertsias GK (2021) Lupus or not? SLE Risk Probability Index (SLERPI): a simple, clinician-friendly machine learning-based model to assist the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 10:758–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brahim A, Jennane R, Riad R, Janvier T, Khedher L, Toumi H, Lespessailles E (2019) A decision support tool for early detection of knee OsteoArthritis using X-ray imaging and machine learning: data from the OsteoArthritis Initiative. Comput Med Imaging Graph 73:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim J, Kim J, Cheon S (2019) A Deep Neural Network-Based Method for Early Detection of Osteoarthritis Using Statistical Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:1281

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ureten K, Erbay H, Maras HH (2020) Detection of rheumatoid arthritis from hand radiographs using a convolutional neural network. Clin Rheumatol 39:969–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patrick MT, Stuart PE, Raja K, Gudjonsson JE, Tejasvi T, Yang J, Chandran V et al (2018) Genetic signature to provide robust risk assessment of psoriatic arthritis development in psoriasis patients. Nat Commun 9:4178

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Plant D, Maciejewski M, Smith S, Nair N, Maximising therapeutic utility in rheumatoid arthritis consortium tRSG, Hyrich K, Ziemek D, Barton A, Verstappen S (2019) Profiling of gene expression biomarkers as a classifier of methotrexate nonresponse in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 71:678–684

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim KJ, Kim M, Adamopoulos IE, Tagkopoulos I (2019) Compendium of synovial signatures identifies pathologic characteristics for predicting treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Immunol 202:1–10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mo X, Chen X, Li H, Li J, Zeng F, Chen Y, He F, Zhang S, Li H, Pan L, Zeng P, Xie Y, Li H, Huang M, He Y, Liang H, Zeng H (2019) Early and accurate prediction of clinical response to methotrexate treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis using machine learning. Front Pharmacol 10:1155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tiulpin A, Klein S, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Thevenot J, Rahtu E, Meurs JV, Oei EHG, Saarakkala S (2019) Multimodal machine learning-based knee osteoarthritis progression prediction from plain radiographs and clinical data. Sci Rep 9:20038

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL (1973) Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 32:413–418

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smits-Engelsman B, Klerks M, Kirby A (2011) Beighton score: a valid measure for generalized hypermobility in children. J Pediatr 158(1):119-123.e1-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Azur MJ, Stuart EA, Frangakis C, Leaf PJ (2011) Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work? Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 20:40–49

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Macarthur C, Wright JG, Srivastava R, Rosser W, Feldman W (1996) Variability in physicians’ reported ordering and perceived reassurance value of diagnostic tests in children with ‘growing pains.’ Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 150:1072–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baxter MP, Dulberg C (1988) “Growing pains” in childhood–a proposal for treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 8:402–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Evans AM (2003) Relationship between “growing pains” and foot posture in children: single-case experimental designs in clinical practice. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 93:111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weiser P (2012) Approach to the patient with noninflammatory musculoskeletal pain. Pediatr Clin North Am 59:471–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Akal conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Drs. Sonmez, Karadag, Demir, Aktay Ayaz, and Sözeri designed the data collection instruments, collected data, carried out the initial analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. Batu conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezgi D. Batu.

Ethics declarations

Consent to participate and for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all children and their parents to participate in the study and for publication.

Previous presentations

This study was presented as an electronic poster at the 26th European Paediatric Rheumatology e-Congress of the Paediatric Rheumatology European Association (PReS), held online on 23–25 September 2020.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akal, F., Batu, E.D., Sonmez, H.E. et al. Diagnosing growing pains in children by using machine learning: a cross-sectional multicenter study. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 3601–3614 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02699-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02699-6

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Ezgi D. Batu