Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hardware deployment of deep learning model for classification of breast carcinoma from digital mammogram images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer is an illness that instils fear in many individuals throughout the world due to its lethal nature. However, in most situations, cancer may be cured if detected early and treated properly. Computer-aided diagnosis is gaining traction because it may be used as an initial screening test for many illnesses, including cancer. Deep learning (DL) is a CAD-based artificial intelligence (AI) powered approach which attempts to mimic the cognitive process of the human brain. Various DL algorithms have been applied for breast cancer diagnosis and have obtained adequate accuracy due to the DL technology’s high feature learning capabilities. However, when it comes to real-time application, deep neural networks (NN) have a high computational complexity in terms of power, speed, and resource usage. With this in mind, this work proposes a miniaturised NN to reduce the number of parameters and computational complexity for hardware deployment. The quantised NN is then accelerated using field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to increase detection speed and minimise power consumption while guaranteeing high accuracy, thus providing a new avenue in assisting radiologists in breast cancer diagnosis using digital mammograms. When evaluated on benchmark datasets such as DDSM, MIAS, and INbreast, the suggested method achieves high classification rates. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 99.38% on the combined dataset.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassan RO, Mostafa H (2021) Implementation of deep neural networks on FPGA-CPU platform using Xilinx SDSOC. Analog Integr Circuits Signal Process 106:399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-020-01638-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sze V, Chen YH, Emer J et al (2018) (2018) Hardware for machine learning: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Cust Integr Circuits Conf CICC 2018:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICC.2018.8357072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sze V, Chen YH, Yang TJ, Emer JS (2017) Efficient processing of deep neural networks: a tutorial and survey. Proc IEEE 105:2295–2329. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2761740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen YH, Krishna T, Emer JS, Sze V (2017) Eyeriss: an energy-efficient reconfigurable accelerator for deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 52:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2016.2616357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hassan SA, Sayed MS, Abdalla MI, Rashwan MA (2020) Breast cancer masses classification using deep convolutional neural networks and transfer learning. Multimed Tools Appl 79:30735–30768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09518-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh L, Alam A (2022) An efficient hybrid methodology for an early detection of breast cancer in digital mammograms. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-03895-w

  7. Mughal B, Muhammad N, Sharif M (2019) Adaptive hysteresis thresholding segmentation technique for localizing the breast masses in the curve stitching domain. Int J Med Inform 126:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ding S, Zhao H, Zhang Y et al (2015) Extreme learning machine: algorithm, theory and applications. Artif Intell Rev 44:103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-013-9405-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah SM, Khan RA, Arif S, Sajid U (2022) Artificial intelligence for breast cancer analysis: trends & directions. Comput Biol Med 142:105221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss K, Khoshgoftaar TM, Wang D (2016) A survey of transfer learning. J Big Data 3:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassan NM, Hamad S, Mahar K (2022) Mammogram breast cancer CAD systems for mass detection and classification: a review. Multimed Tools Appl 81:20043–20075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12332-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhungel N, Carneiro G, Bradley AP (2017) A deep learning approach for the analysis of masses in mammograms with minimal user intervention. Med Image Anal 37:114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shen R, Yao J, Yan K et al (2020) Unsupervised domain adaptation with adversarial learning for mass detection in mammogram. Neurocomputing 393:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribli D, Horváth A, Unger Z et al (2018) Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with deep learning. Sci Rep 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22437-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J (2017) Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39:1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shawahna A, Sait SM, El-Maleh A (2019) FPGA-based accelerators of deep learning networks for learning and classification: a review. IEEE Access 7:7823–7859. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2890150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu B, Zou D, Feng L, et al (2019) An FPGA-based CNN accelerator integrating depthwise separable convolution. Electron 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8030281

  18. Liu Z, Chow P, Xu J, et al (2019) A uniform architecture design for accelerating 2d and 3d cnns on fpgas. Electron 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8010065

  19. Suckling J, Parker J, Dance D, Astley S, Hutt I, Boggis C, Ricketts I et al (2015) Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database v1.21. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/250394. Accessed Mar 2022

  20. Moreira IC, Amaral I, Domingues I et al (2012) INbreast: toward a full-field digital mammographic database. Acad Radiol 19:236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Joseph AM, John MG, Dhas AS (2017) Mammogram image denoising filters: a comparative study. 2017 Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS), Mallasamudram, India, pp 184–1891. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDSS.2017.8073679

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramachandran V, Kishorebabu V (2019) A tri-state filter for the removal of salt and pepper noise in mammogram images. J Med Syst 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1133-0

  23. Maria HH, Jossy AM, Malarvizhi G, Jenitta A (2021) Analysis of lifting scheme based double density dual-tree complex wavelet transform for de-noising medical images. Optik 241:2–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jang S, Liu W, Cho Y (2022) Convolutional neural network model compression method for software—hardware co-design. Information 13(10):451. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13100451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. https://www.tensil.ai/. Accessed Mar 2022

  26. Hu X, Wen S, Lam HK (2022) Dynamic random distribution learning rate for neural networks training. Appl Soft Comput 124:109058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang SH, Lv YD, Sui Y, et al (2018) Alcoholism detection by data augmentation and convolutional neural network with stochastic pooling. J Med Syst 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0845-x

  28. Rahangdale A, Raut S (2019) Deep neural network regularization for feature selection in learning-to-rank. IEEE Access 7:53988–54006. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ting FF, Tan YJ, Sim KS (2019) Convolutional neural network improvement for breast cancer classification. Expert Syst Appl 120:103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiao Z, Gao X, Wang Y, Li J (2016) A deep feature based framework for breast masses classification. Neurocomputing 197:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Al-antari MA, Al-masni MA, Choi MT et al (2018) A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification. Int J Med Inform 117:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Salama WM, Aly MH (2021) Deep learning in mammography images segmentation and classification: automated CNN approach. Alexandria Eng J 60:4701–4709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ragab DA, Sharkas M, Marshall S, Ren J (2019) Breast cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks and support vector machines. PeerJ 2019:1–23. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by Xilinx Women In Technology Fall Grant 2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India

    Kayalvizhi R, Heartlin Maria H & Malarvizhi S

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India

    Revathi Venkatraman

  3. Department of Translational Medicine and Research, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 60320, India

    Shantanu Patil

Authors
  1. Kayalvizhi R
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heartlin Maria H
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Malarvizhi S
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Revathi Venkatraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shantanu Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malarvizhi S.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

R, K., H, H.M., S, M. et al. Hardware deployment of deep learning model for classification of breast carcinoma from digital mammogram images. Med Biol Eng Comput 61, 2843–2857 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02883-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02883-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation