Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

3D reconstruction of bone CT scan images based on deformable convex hull

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images is an important diagnostic method, which is helpful for doctors to clearly recognize the 3D shape of the lesion and make the surgical plan. In the study of medical image reconstruction, most researchers use surface rendering or volume rendering method to construct 3D models from image sequences. The watertightness of the algorithm-reconstructed surface will be affected by the segmentation precision or the thickness of the CT layer. The articular surfaces at femoral ends are often used in biomechanical simulation experiments. The model may not conform to its original shape due to the manual repair of non-watertight surfaces. To solve this problem, a 3D reconstruction method of leg bones based on deep learning is proposed in this paper. By deforming the convex hull of the target, comparing with state-of-the-art methods, our method can stably generate a watertight model with higher reconstruction accuracy. In the situation of target transition structures getting fuzzy and the layer spacing increasing, the proposed method can maintain better reconstruction performance and appear higher robustness. Also, the chamfer loss is optimized based on the rotational shape of the leg bones, and the weight of the loss function can be assigned according to the geometric characteristics of the target. Experiment results show that the optimization method improves the accuracy of the model. Furthermore, our research provides a reference for the application of deep learning in medical image reconstruction.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Fang W, Lin D, Kou W et al (2022) Advances in medical image three-dimensional reconstruction system[J]. Chinese J Med Phys 39(7):823–827

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lu LY, Yin MX, Fu LY et al (2023) Uncertainty-aware pseudo-label and consistency for semi-supervised medical image segmentation[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 79(10)

  3. Chen SL, Qiu CZ, Yang WP et al (2022) Combining edge guidance and feature pyramid for medical image segmentation[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 78(9)

  4. Dinh PH (2023) Combining spectral total variation with dynamic threshold neural P systems for medical image fusion[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 80(12)

  5. Dinh PH (2021) Combining Gabor energy with equilibrium optimizer algorithm for multi-modality medical image fusion[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 68(15)

  6. Dinh PH (2023) Medical image fusion based on enhanced three-layer image decomposition and Chameleon swarm algorithm[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 84(23)

  7. Dinh PH (2021) Multi-modal medical image fusion based on equilibrium optimizer algorithm and local energy functions[J]. Appl Intell 51(11):8416–8431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinh PH (2022) An improved medical image synthesis approach based on marine predators algorithm and maximum Gabor energy[J]. Neural Comput Applic 34(6):4367–4385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dinh PH (2023) A novel approach based on marine predators algorithm for medical image enhancement[J]. Sensing and Imaging 6:23

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chao W, Xuejiang R (2021) Application research of 3D reconstruction of auxiliary medical image based on computer[C]. Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical System in Smart City Conference 106–112

  11. Chen F, Xie YT, Xu P et al (2022) Efficient lower-limb segmentation for large-scale volumetric CT by using projection view and voxel group attention[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput 60(8):2201–2216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cai LQ, Long T, Dai YH et al (2020) Mask R-CNN-based detection and segmentation for pulmonary nodule 3D visualization diagnosis[J]. IEEE Access 8:44400–44409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao K, Sun QY, Liu ZZ et al (2020) 3D reconstruction of human head CT images based on VTK; proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), Shenzhen, PEOPLES R CHINA, F Dec 18-21, 2020 [C]. IEEE, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kigka VI, Rigas G, Sakellarios A et al (2018) 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries and atherosclerotic plaques based on computed tomography angiography images[J]. Biomed Signal Proc Contr 40:286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo CFJ, Barman J, Hsieh CW et al (2021) Fast fully automatic detection, classification and 3D reconstruction of pulmonary nodules in CT images by local image feature analysis[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 68(20)

  16. Yuan TR, Zhang HS, Liu H et al (2021) Watertight 2-manifold 3D bone surface model reconstruction from CT images based on visual hyper-spherical mapping[J]. Math Biosci Eng 18(2):1280–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang J, Gong LR, Yu KP et al (2020) 3D reconstruction for super-resolution CT images in the internet of health things using deep learning[J]. Ieee Access 8:121513–121525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu W, Ning G (2022) 3D Reconstruction of Medical Image Based on Improved Ray Casting Algorithm. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 459–476

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dixit S, Pai VG, Rodrigues VC et al (2019) 3D reconstruction of 2D X-ray images[J]. In: 4th International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution (CSITSS)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang BK, Wang X, Liang X et al (2017) 3D reconstruction of human bones based on dictionary learning[J]. Med Eng Phys 49:163–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu T, Lu YH, Zhang Y et al (2022) A bone segmentation method based on multi-scale features fuse U(2)Net and improved dice loss in CT image process[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 77(10)

  22. Mescheder L, Oechsle M, Niemeyer M et al (2019) Occupancy networks: learning 3D reconstruction in function space; proceedings of the 32nd IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, F Jun 16-20, 2019 [C]. IEEE Computer Soc, Los Alamitos

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hanocka R, Hertz A, Fish N et al (2019) MeshCNN: a network with an edge[J]. ACM Trans Graph 38(4):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Joseph SS, Dennisan A (2020) Three dimensional reconstruction models for medical modalities: a comprehensive investigation and analysis[J]. Curr Med Imag 16(6):653–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanocka R, Metzer G, Giryes R et al (2020) Point2Mesh: a self-prior for deformable meshes[J]. ACM Trans Graph 39(4):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lorensen WE, Cline HE (1987) Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm[J]. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics:163–169

  27. Roth SD (1982) Ray casting for modeling solids[J]. Comp Graph Image Proc 18(2):109–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Courtbrown CM, Mcbirnie J (1995) The epidemiology of tibial fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surgery-British 77B(3):417–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen DCT, Benameur S, Mignotte M et al (2023) 3D biplanar reconstruction of lower limbs using nonlinear statistical models[J]. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 18

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jiangsu Province Hospital in Nanjing, China, for providing valuable CT data.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51975293 and 52205018), Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2019ZD052010), and Zhangjiagang Science and Technology Project (ZKCXY2124 and ZKCXY2101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonghua Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, ., Lu, Y., Xu, J. et al. 3D reconstruction of bone CT scan images based on deformable convex hull. Med Biol Eng Comput 62, 551–561 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02951-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02951-7

Keywords