Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Re-UNet: a novel multi-scale reverse U-shape network architecture for low-dose CT image reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the growing awareness of public health has brought attention to low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans. However, the CT image generated in this way contains a lot of noise or artifacts, which make increasing researchers to investigate methods to enhance image quality. The advancement of deep learning technology has provided researchers with novel approaches to enhance the quality of LDCT images. In the past, numerous studies based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) have yielded remarkable results in LDCT image reconstruction. Nonetheless, they all tend to continue to design new networks based on the fixed network architecture of UNet shape, which also leads to more and more complex networks. In this paper, we proposed a novel network model with a reverse U-shape architecture for the noise reduction in the LDCT image reconstruction task. In the model, we further designed a novel multi-scale feature extractor and edge enhancement module that yields a positive impact on CT images to exhibit strong structural characteristics. Evaluated on a public dataset, the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms the compared algorithms based on traditional U-shaped architecture in terms of preserving texture details and reducing noise, as demonstrated by achieving the highest PSNR, SSIM and RMSE value. This study may shed light on the reverse U-shaped network architecture for CT image reconstruction, and could investigate the potential on other medical image processing.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seeram E (2015) Computed tomography-e-book: physical principles, clinical applications, and quality control. Elsevier Health Sciences

  2. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2005) Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK-2003 review, vol 67. NRPB Chilton

  4. Gartenschläger M, Schweden F, Gast K, Westermeier T, Kauczor HU, Von Zitzewitz H, Thelen M (1998) Pulmonary nodules: detection with low-dose vs conventional-dose spiral CT. Eur Radiol 8:609–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230(3):619–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Li T, Liang Z, Xing L (2008) Dose reduction for kilovotage cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 53(11):2897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bian J, Siewerdsen JH, Han X, Sidky EY, Prince JL, Pelizzari CA, Pan X (2010) Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol 55(22):6575

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Xia W, Shan H, Wang G, Zhang Y (2023) Physics-/model-based and data-driven methods for low-dose computed tomography: A survey. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 40(2):89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahiner B, Yagle AE (1993) Image reconstruction from projections under wavelet constraints. IEEE Trans Signal Process 41(12):3579–3584

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Lu H (2010) Statistical sinogram smoothing for low-dose CT with segmentation-based adaptive filtering. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 57(5):2587–2598

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sukovic P, Clinthorne NH (2000) Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for dual energy X-ray transmission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19(11):1075–1081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sidky EY, Pan X (2008) Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization. Phys Med Biol 53(17):4777

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Browne J, De Pierro AB (1996) A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15(5):687–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fessler JA, Hero AO (1994) Space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Signal Process 42(10):2664–2677

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen H, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liao P, Li K, Zhou J, Wang G (2017) Low-dose ct via convolutional neural network. Biomed Opt Express 8(2):679–694

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao X, Zhang L, Mou X (2018) Single image super-resolution using dual-branch convolutional neural network. IEEE Access 7:15767–15778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778

  18. Chen H, Zhang Y, Kalra MK, Lin F, Chen Y, Liao P, Zhou J, Wang G (2017) Low-dose CT with a residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(12):2524–2535

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang T, Jin Y, Li Y, Wang T (2020) Edcnn: Edge enhancement-based densely connected network with compound loss for low-dose ct denoising. In: 2020 15th IEEE International conference on signal processing (ICSP), vol 1, pp 193–198. IEEE

  20. Li S, Li Q, Li R, Wu W, Zhao J, Qiang Y, Tian Y (2022) An adaptive self-guided wavelet convolutional neural network with compound loss for low-dose CT denoising. Biomed Signal Process Control 75:103543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang Q, Yan P, Zhang Y, Yu H, Shi Y, Mou X, Kalra MK, Zhang Y, Sun L, Wang G (2018) Low-dose CT image denoising using a generative adversarial network with Wasserstein distance and perceptual loss. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37(6):1348–1357

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson J, Alahi A, Fei-Fei L (2016) Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In:Computer vision–ECCV 2016: 14th european conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14, pp 694–711. Springer

  23. Zhang Y, Hu D, Zhao Q, Quan G, Liu J, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Coatrieux G, Chen Y, Yu H (2021) Clear: comprehensive learning enabled adversarial reconstruction for subtle structure enhanced low-dose CT imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 40(11):3089–3101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang D, Fan F, Wu Z, Liu R, Wang F, Yu H (2022) Ctformer: Convolution-free token2token dilated vision transformer for low-dose ct denoising. arXiv:2202.13517

  25. Liu J, Jiang H, Ning F, Li M (2022) Pang W Dfsne-net: Deviant feature sensitive noise estimate network for low-dose CT denoising. Comput Biol Med 149:106061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bera S, Biswas PK (2023) Self supervised low dose computed tomography image denoising using invertible network exploiting inter slice congruence. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, pp 5614–5623

  27. Lu Z, Xia W, Huang Y, Hou M, Chen H, Zhou J, Shan H, Zhang Y (2022) M 3 nas: Multi-scale and multi-level memory-efficient neural architecture search for low-dose ct denoising. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 42(3):850–863

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pp 234–241. Springer

  29. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McCollough CH, Bartley AC, Carter RE, Chen B, Drees TA, Edwards P, Holmes DR III, Huang AE, Khan F, Leng S et al (2017) Low-dose CT for the detection and classification of metastatic liver lesions: results of the 2016 low dose CT grand challenge. Med Phys 44(10):e339–e352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980

Download references

Funding

The authors sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for the insightful comments. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 62076209, and in part by the NHC Key Laboratory of Nuclear Technology Medical Transformation (MIANYANG CENTRAL HOSPITAL) under Grant No. 2022HYX012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Technology, Laboratory for Brain Science and Medical Artificial Intelligence, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010, China

    Lianjin Xiong, Ning Li, Wei Qiu, Yiqian Luo & Yangsong Zhang

  2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China

    Yishi Li

  3. NHC Key Laboratory of Nuclear Technology Medical Transformation (MIANYANG CENTRAL HOSPITAL), Mianyang, 621000, China

    Yangsong Zhang

  4. Key Laboratory of Testing Technology for Manufacturing Process, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, 621010, China

    Yangsong Zhang

Authors
  1. Lianjin Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ning Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yiqian Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yishi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yangsong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangsong Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, L., Li, N., Qiu, W. et al. Re-UNet: a novel multi-scale reverse U-shape network architecture for low-dose CT image reconstruction. Med Biol Eng Comput 62, 701–712 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02966-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02966-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation