Skip to main content
Log in

Image registration based on virtual frame sequence analysis

  • Short communication
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This paper is to propose a new framework for medical image registration with large nonrigid deformations, which still remains one of the biggest challenges for image fusion and further analysis in many medical applications.

Method

Registration problem is formulated as to recover a deformation process with the known initial state and final state. To deal with large nonlinear deformations, virtual frames are proposed to be inserted to model the deformation process. A time parameter is introduced and the deformation between consecutive frames is described with a linear affine transformation.

Results

Experiments are conducted with simple geometric deformation as well as complex deformations presented in MRI and ultrasound images. All the deformations are characterized with nonlinearity. The positive results demonstrated the effectiveness of this algorithm.

Conclusion

The framework proposed in this paper is feasible to register medical images with large nonlinear deformations and is especially useful for sequential images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hajnal JV, Hawkes DJ, Hill D (2001) Medical image registration. CRC Press Boca Raton

  2. Maintz JBA and Viergever MA (1998). A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal 2: 1–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sakdinawat AE, Iwata K, Hwang AB, Tang HR, Wong KH, Hasegawa BH (2002) Development of external fiducial markers for image registration in small animal SPECT/CT. Presented at Nuclear Science Symposium, EEE

  4. Gueziec AP, Kazanzides P, Williamson B, Taylor RH, Lord D (1998) Anatomy-based registration of CT-scan and X-ray fluoroscopy data for intra-operative guidance of a surgical robot. Presented at SPIE Med Imaging

  5. Suarez E, Westin C-F, Rovaris E, Ruiz-Alzola J (2002) Nonrigid registration using regularized matching weighted by local structure. Presented at medical image computing and computer-assisted lntervention (MICCAI)

  6. Collignon A (1998) Multi-modality medical image registration by maximization of mutual information. Ph.D Thesis, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

  7. Viola PA (1995) Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Ph.D Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, USA

  8. Lefébure M and Cohen LD (2001). Image registration, optical flow and local Rigidity. J Math Imaging Vis 14: 131–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrillo A, Duerk JL, Lewin JS and Wilson DL (2000). Semiautomatic 3-D image registration as applied to interventional MRI liver cancer treatment. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19: 175–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer CR, Leichtman GS, Brunberg JA, Wahl RL and Quint LE (1995). Simultaneous usage of homologous points lines and planes for optimal, 3-D, linear registration of multimodality imaging data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 14: 1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ, Hussain Z, Green SEM, Ruff CF and Robinson GP (1993). Accurate combination of CT and MR data of the head: validation and applications in surgical and therapy planning. Comput Med Imaging Graph 17: 357–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rohr K, Fornefettb M and Stiehlb HS (2003). Spline-based elastic image registration: integration of landmark errors and orientation attributes. Comput Vis Image Underst 90: 153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang X, Cai Z, Jaeger M, Lu H (2003) Deformable image registration using improved hybrid elastic model. Presented at 3rd international symposium on multispectral image processing and pattern recognition

  14. Anandan P (1989). A computational framework and an algorithm for the measurement of visual motion. Int J Comput Vis 2: 283–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper JR, Ritter NJ (2003) Optical flow for validating medical image registration. Presented at 9th IASTED international conference on signal and image processing

  16. Barron JL (2004) Experience with 3D optical flow on gated MRI cardiac datasets. Presented at 1st Canadian conference on computer and robot vision

  17. Horn BKP and Schunck BG (1981). Determining optical flow. Artif Intell 17: 185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barron JL, Fleet DJ and Beauchemin SS (1994). Performance of optical flow techniques. Int J Comput Vis 12: 43–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu H, Hong T-H, Herman M and Chellappa R (1998). Accuracy vs efficiency trade-offs in optical flow algorithms. Comput Vis Image Underst 72: 271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Periaswamy S and Farid H (2003). Elastic registration in the presence of intensity variations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22: 865–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. S. Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, H., Ng, W.S., Shi, D. et al. Image registration based on virtual frame sequence analysis. Int J CARS 2, 127–133 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0121-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0121-5

Keywords

Navigation