Abstract
Objective
Mammography is a widely used screening tool for the early detection of breast cancer. One of the commonly missed signs of breast cancer is architectural distortion. The purpose of this study is to explore the application of fractal analysis and texture measures for the detection of architectural distortion in screening mammograms taken prior to the detection of breast cancer.
Materials and methods
A method based on Gabor filters and phase portrait analysis was used to detect initial candidates for sites of architectural distortion. A total of 386 regions of interest (ROIs) were automatically obtained from 14 “prior mammograms”, including 21 ROIs related to architectural distortion. From the corresponding set of 14 “detection mammograms”, 398 ROIs were obtained, including 18 related to breast cancer. For each ROI, the fractal dimension and Haralick’s texture features were computed. The fractal dimension of the ROIs was calculated using the circular average power spectrum technique.
Results
The average fractal dimension of the normal (false-positive) ROIs was significantly higher than that of the ROIs with architectural distortion (p = 0.006). For the “prior mammograms”, the best receiver operating characteristics (ROC) performance achieved, in terms of the area under the ROC curve, was 0.80 with a Bayesian classifier using four features including fractal dimension, entropy, sum entropy, and inverse difference moment. Analysis of the performance of the methods with free-response receiver operating characteristics indicated a sensitivity of 0.79 at 8.4 false positives per image in the detection of sites of architectural distortion in the “prior mammograms”.
Conclusion
Fractal dimension offers a promising way to detect the presence of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian cancer statistics, (2007). http://www.cancer.ca/vgn/images/portal/cit_86751114/36/15/1816216925cw_2007stats_en.pdf. Accessed on 22 June 2007
Schneider MA (2000) Better detection: improving our chances. In: Yaffe MJ(eds) Digital mammography: 5th international workshop on digital mammography, Toronto, ON, Canada, June 2000. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, pp 3–6
Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184(3): 613–617
Majid AS, Paredes ES, Doherty RD, Sharma NR, Salvador X (2003) Missed breast carcinoma: Pitfalls and pearls. RadioGraphics 23: 881–895
Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O’Shaughnessy KF, Brenner RJ, Sickles EA (2003) Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening. Radiology 226: 494–503
Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Brenner RJ (2004) Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology 230: 811–819
Peitgen HO (ed) (2002) Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on digital mammography. Springer, Bremen, Germany, June 2002
Rangayyan RM, Ayres FJ, Desautels JEL (2007) A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: toward the detection of subtle signs. J Franklin Inst 344: 312–348
Doi K (2006) Diagnostic imaging over the last 50 years: research and development in medical imaging science and technology. Phys Med Biol 51: R5–R27
Doi K (2007) Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imag Graph 31: 198–211
Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS (2003) Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. Am J Roentgenol 181: 1083–1088
Prajna S, Rangayyan RM, Ayres FJ, Desautels JEL (2008) Detection of architectural distortion in mammograms acquired prior to the detection of breast cancer using texture and fractal analysis. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Sonka M (eds) Proceedings of SPIE medical imaging 2008: image processing, San Diego, CA, February 2008
American College of Radiology (ACR) (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
Homer MJ (1997) Mammographic interpretation: a practical approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Knutzen AM, Gisvold JJ (1993) Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. Mayo Clinic Proc 68: 454–460
Yankaskas BC, Schell MJ, Bird RE, Desrochers DA (2001) Reassesment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community based study. Am J Roentgenol 177: 535–541
Burrell H, Evans A, Wilson A, Pinder S (2001) False-negative breast screening assesment: what lessons we can learn?. Clin Radiol 56: 385–388
Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson ARM, Pinder SE, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Blamey RW, Robertson JFR (1996) Screening interval breast cancers: Mammographic features and prognostic factors. Radiology 199(4): 811–817
Broeders MJM, Onland-Moret NC, Rijken HJTM, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, Holland R (2003) Use of previous screening mammograms to identify features indicating cases that would have a possible gain in prognosis following earlier detection. Eur J Cancer 39: 1770–1775
Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2005) Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 24(1): 59–67
Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2007) Reduction of false positives in the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms by using a geometrically constrained phase portrait model. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1: 361–369
Rangayyan RM, Ayres FJ (2006) Gabor filters and phase portraits for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms. Med Biol Eng Comput 44: 883–894
Guo Q, Shao J, Ruiz V (2005) Investigation of support vector machine for the detection of architectural distortion in mammographic images. J Phys Conf Ser 15: 88–94
Suckling J, Parker J, Dance DR, Astley S, Hutt I, Boggis CRM, Ricketts I, Stamakis E, Cerneaz N, Kok S-L, Taylor P, Betal D, Savage J (1994) The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database. In: Gale AG, Astley SM, Dance DD, Cairns AY(eds) Digital mammography: proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on digital mammography. Elsevier, York, pp 375–378
Tourassi GD, Delong DM, Floyd CE Jr (2006) A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms. Phys Med Biol 51(5): 1299–1312
Mudigonda NR, Rangayyan RM (2001) Texture flow-field analysis for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms. In: Ramakrishnan AG (ed) Proceedings of biovision. Bangalore, India, December 2001, pp 76–81
Matsubara T, Ichikawa T, Hara T, Fujita H, Kasai S, Endo T, Iwase T (2003) Automated detection methods for architectural distortions around skinline and within mammary gland on mammograms. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG, Doi K, Reiber JHC (eds) International congress series: proceedings of the 17th international congress and exhibition on computer assisted radiology and surgery, London, UK, June 2003. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 950–955
Ichikawa T, Matsubara T, Hara T, Fujita H, Endo T, Iwase T (2004) Automated detection method for architectural distortion areas on mammograms based on morphological processing and surface analysis. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Sonka M (eds) Proceedings of SPIE medical imaging 2004: image processing, San Diego, CA, February 2004. SPIE, pp 920–925
Sampat MP, Whitman GJ, Markey MK, Bovik AC (2005) Evidence based detection of spiculated masses and architectural distortion. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Reinhardt JM (eds) Proceedings of SPIE medical imaging 2005: image processing, vol 5747, San Diego, CA, April 2005, pp 26–37
Eltonsy N, Tourassi G, Elmaghraby A (2006) Investigating performance of a morphology-based CAD scheme in detecting architectural distortion in screening mammograms. In: Lemke HU, Inamura K, Doi K, Vannier MW, Farman AG (eds) Proceedings of the 20th international congress and exhibition on computer assisted radiology and surgery (CARS 2006), Osaka, Japan, June 2006. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 336–338
Evans WP, Burhenne LJW, Laurie L, O’Shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA (2002) Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 225(1): 182–189
Burhenne LJW, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O’Shaughnessy LF, Sickles EA, Tabar L, Vyborny CJ, Castellino RA (2000) Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215(2): 554–562
Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA (2001) Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219(1): 192–202
van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R (1993) The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. Cancer 72(6): 1933–1938
Sameti M, Morgan-Parkes J, Ward RK, Palcic B (1998) Classifying image features in the last screening mammograms prior to detection of a malignant mass. In: Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks J, van Erning L (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on digital mammography, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, June 1998, pp 127–134
Petrick N, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, Paquerault S (2000) Evaluation of an automated computer-aided diagnosis system for the detection of masses on prior mammograms. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 3979. Medical imaging 2000: image processing, pp 967–973
Zheng B, Good WF, Armfield DR, Cohen C, Hertzberg T, Sumkin JH, Gur D (2003) Performance change of mammographic CAD schemes optimized with most-recent and prior image databases. Acad Radiol 10: 283–288
Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE (2002) Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 179: 1173–1177
Sumkin JH, Holbert BL, Herrmann JS, Hakim CA, Ganott MA, Poller WR, Shah R, Hardesty LA, Gur D (2003) Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination. Am J Roentgenol 180: 343–346
Varela C, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R (2005) Use of prior mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses. Eur J Radiol 56: 248–255
Ciatto S, Del Turco MR, Burke P, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M (2003) Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. Brit J Canc 89: 1645–1649
Moberg K, Bjurstam N, Wilczek B, Rostgård L, Egge E, Muren C (2001) Computer assisted detection of interval breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 39: 104–110
Garvican L, Field S (2001) A pilot evaluation of the R2 Image Checker System and users’ response in the detection of interval breast cancers on previous screening films. Clin Radiol 56: 833–837
Mandelbrot BB (1983) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. San Francisco, CA, Freeman
Fortin C, Kumaresan R, Ohley W (1992) Fractal dimension in the analysis of medical images. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 11(2): 65–71
Rangayyan RM, Nguyen TM (2007) Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms. J Dig imag 20(3): 223–237
Huang Q, Lorch JR, Dubes RC (1994) Can the fractal dimension of images be measured?. Pattern Recognition 27: 1569–1579
Aguilar M, Anguiano E, Pancorbo MA (1993) Fractal characterization by frequency analysis: II. A new method. J Microsc 172: 233–238
Anguiano E, Pancorbo MA, Aguilar M (1993) Fractal characterization by frequency analysis: I. Surfaces. J Microsc 172: 223–232
Schepers HE, van Beek JHGM, Bassingthwaighte JB (1992) Four methods to estimate the fractal dimension from self-affine signals. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 11(2): 57–64
Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K (1987) Self-organized criticality: An explanation of 1/f noise. Am Phys Soc 59: 381–384
Lowen SB, Teich MC (1993) Fractal renewal processes generate 1/f noise. Am Phys Soc 47: 992–1001
DeLos Rios P, Zhang Y-C (1999) Universal/noise from dissipative self-organized criticality models. Am Phys Soc 82: 472–475
Billock VA, De Guzman GC, Kelso JAS (2001) Fractal time and 1/f spectra in dynamic images and human vision. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom 148: 136–146
Uss M, Lukin VV, Abramov S, Vozel B, Chehdi K (2007) Joint estimation of multiplicative and impulsive noise parameters in remote sensing with fractal structure. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, Honolulu, HI, pp 581–584
StǑsić T, StǑsić BD (2006) Multifractal analysis of human retinal vessels. IEEE Trans Med Imag 25: 1101–1107
Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 9(1): 62–66
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2007) Design and performance analysis of oriented feature detectors. J Electronic Imag 16(2): 023007:1–12
Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW (1989) Discrete-time signal processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Haralick RM (1979) Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 67(5): 786–804
Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 3(6): 610–622
Rangayyan RM (2005) Biomedical image analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Rangayyan RM, Nguyen TM, Ayres FJ, Nandi AK (2007) Analysis of the effect of spatial resolution on texture features in the classification of breast masses in mammograms. In: Lemke HU, Inamura K, Doi K, Vannier MW, Farman AG (eds) Proceedings of the 21st international congress and exhibition on computer assisted radiology and surgery (CARS 2007), Berlin, Germany, June 2007. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 334–336
Nandi RJ, Nandi AK, Rangayyan RM, Scutt D (2006) Classification of breast masses in mammograms using genetic programming and feature selection. Med Biol Eng Comput 44: 683–694
Ware JH, Mosteller F, Delgado F, Donnelly C, Ingelfinger JA (1992) P values. In: Bailar JC III, Mosteller F(eds) Medical uses of statistics, 2nd edn. NEJM Books, Boston, pp 181–200
Metz CE (1986) ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Investigative Radiology 21: 720–733
Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern classification, 2nd edn. Wiley–Interscience, New York
Alto H, Rangayyan RM, Paranjape RB, Desautels JEL, Bryant H (2003) An indexed atlas of digital mammograms for computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer. Ann Télécommun 58(5–6): 820–835
Alberta Cancer Board, http://www.cancerboard.ab.ca/screentest, Alberta, Canada (2004). Screen Test: Alberta Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer—2001/03 Biennial Report
Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ (1996) Automated analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 41: 909–923
Caldwell CB, Stapleton SJ, Holdsworth DW, Jong RA, Weiser WJ, Cooke G, Yaffe MJ (1990) Characterization of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. Phys Med Biol 35(2): 235–247
Zheng L, Chan AK (2001) An artificial intelligent algorithm for tumor detection in screening mammogram. IEEE Trans Med Imag 20(7): 559–567
Pohlman S, Obuchowski KA, Chilcote WA, Grundfest-Broniatowski S (1996) Quantitative classification of breast tumours in digitized mammograms. Med Phys 23(8): 1337–1345
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rangayyan, R.M., Prajna, S., Ayres, F.J. et al. Detection of architectural distortion in prior screening mammograms using Gabor filters, phase portraits, fractal dimension, and texture analysis. Int J CARS 2, 347–361 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0143-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0143-z