Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An expectation maximization approach to impulsive noise removal in digital radiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Impulsive noise constitutes a serious disturbing factor in digital radiography. The aim of this paper is to propose a new filter which is capable of eliminating efficiently this kind of noise.

Method

The filter is based on the classical switching scheme: the pulses are first detected and then corrected through a median filter. The novelty element is a pulse detector based on an adequate statistical model of the image noise. This model is constituted of a mixture of photon counting and impulsive noise.

Results

The filter operation has been verified and compared with existing algorithms on both synthetic and real images. The filter is capable to remove, on the average, more than 94% of the pulses, with a positive predictive value higher than 80%. The computational time required to filter a radiograph of 4.5 Mpixels is just above 2 s.

Conclusion

Thanks to the accurate description of the noise statistics and the efficient computational scheme implemented, the filter can be used to reliably and quickly remove impulsive noise from digital radiographs. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed filter with respect to traditional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Polesel A, Ramponi G, Mathews VJ (2000) Image enhancement via adaptive unsharp masking. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(3): 505–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Frosio I, Ferrigno G, Borghese NA (2006) Enhancing digital cephalic radiography with mixture models and local gamma correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(1): 113–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frosio I, Borghese NA (2004) A new switching median filter for digital radiography. In: Proc MIC 2004, Rome, Italy, 19–22 October 2004

  4. Windyga PS (2001) Fast impulsive noise removal. IEEE Trans Image Proc 10(1): 173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Z, Zhang D (1999) Progressive switching median filter for the removal of impulse noise from highly corrupted images. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II 46(1): 78–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alparone T, Baronti S, Carla R (1995) Two-dimensional rank-conditioned median filter. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II 42(2): 130–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pok G, Liu JC, Nair AS (2003) Selective removal of impulsive noise based on homogeneity level information. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(1): 85–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garnett G, Huegerich T, Chui C, He W (2005) A universal noise removal algorithm with an impulse detector. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(11): 1747–1754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saeedl M, Rabiee HR, Kar WC, Nguyen TQ (1997) Bayesian restoration of noisy images with the EM algorithm. In: Proc ICIP 1997, pp 322–325

  10. Eldar YC, Yeredor A (2001) Finite-memory denoising in impulsive noise using Gaussian mixture models. IEEE Trans Circ Syst II Anal Dig Signal Proc 48(11): 1069–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frosio I, Borghese NA (2008) Statistical based impulsive noise removal in digital radiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (in press). doi:10.1109/TMI.2008.922698

  12. Frosio I, Lucchese M, Borghese NA (2007) A new and reliable Poisson noise estimator for radiographic images. In: Proc ICIAP 2007, Modena (Italy), September 2007

  13. Webb S (1988) The physics of medical imaging. Adam Hilger, Bristol, Philadelphia, New York, pp 29–32, 571–576

  14. Yaffe MJ, Rowlands JA (1997) X-ray detectors for digital radiography. Phys Med Biol 42: 1–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. http://209.73.52.252/assets/pdf/parts_S/s7199-01_kmpd1077e07.pdf

  16. Weiss NA (2002) Introductory statistics, 6th edn. Addison Wesley, Reading

  17. Fano U (1947) Ionization yield of radiations. II. The fluctuations of the number of ions. Phys Rev 72: 26–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weisstein EW (2008) Stirling’s approximation. From MathWorld—a wolfram web resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/StirlingsApproximation.html

  19. Madsen K, Nielsen HB, Tingleff O (2004) Methods for non linear least squares problems. http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/courses/02611/nllsq.pdf

  20. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B 39(1): 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fawcett T (2003) ROC graphs: notes and practical considerations for data mining researchers. Tech report HPL-2003-4. HP Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Frosio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frosio, I., Abati, S. & Borghese, N.A. An expectation maximization approach to impulsive noise removal in digital radiography. Int J CARS 3, 91–96 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0162-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0162-4

Keywords

Navigation