Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring and robotizing shoulder arthroplasty for training and optimization of suturing techniques

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Shoulder arthroplasty with a humeral head prosthesis is used to treat complex proximal humeral fractures, and the outcome depends on the placement and integrity of sutures. The object of this research is to determine the forces supported by sutural filaments that bind the tuberosities to the prosthesis in proximal humeral fractures. Knowledge of these forces facilitates comparison of different suturing strategies that may improve the surgical procedure and provide better outcomes.

Method

A robotic workstation and a set of sensor modules were designed and built to emulate post-surgery rehabilitation geometry and forces with the required precision and repeatability. This system allows monitoring the forces supported by each sutural thread, as well as measurement of the millimeter scale displacements between the bone fragments produced postoperatively during rehabilitation movements. Several common suturing strategies carried out by orthopedists in shoulder arthroplasty with placement of a humeral head prosthesis were emulated using the robotic system.

Results

Based on in vitro laboratory experiments, the shoulder arthroplasty suture that supports higher strains was identified. The sutural band with maximum stress was not the same when the humerus is immobilized after surgery and in the postoperative rehabilitation phase.

Conclusion

The robotic system for shoulder arthroplasty with humeral head prosthesis placement provides biomechanical insight with quantitative analysis of the force distribution regarding the suturing strategy used in the procedure. The suture most likely to fail early when increasing tension in the rotator cuff muscles is the one passed through both tuberosities. The clinical significance of these findings is identification of the need to avoid shortening the humeral height or increasing retroversion in this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kralinger F et al (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 217–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Molé D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11: 401–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Takanobul H et al (1998) Quantification of masticatory efficiency with a mastication robot. In: IEEE international conference on robotics & automation

  4. Xu WL, Bronlund J, Kieser J (2005) Choosing new ways to chew: a robotic model of the human masticatory system for reproducing chewing behaviors. Robot Autom Magn, vol 12, issue 2

  5. Nishikawa K et al (2003) Modeling and analysis of elastic tongue mechanism of talking robot for acoustic simulation. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems

  6. Mizuuchi I et al (2002) The design and control of the flexible spine of a fully tendon-driven humanoid, Kenta. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems

  7. Debski RE et al (2005) Stress and strain in the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament during a simulated clinical examination. J Shoulder Elbow Surg

  8. She H (2004) Programming by demonstration in the application of rehabilitation robots, PhD Thesis, University of Bremen

  9. Billard A, Dillmann R (eds) (2006) The social mechanisms of robot programming by demonstrations, special issue. Intell Auton Syst, vol 54, no. 5

  10. Frigola M, Poyatos J, Casals A, Amat J (2003) Improving robot programming flexibility through physical human–robot interaction. In: IEEE IROS-workshop on robot programming by demonstration

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alícia Casals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casals, A., Amat, J., Frigola, M. et al. Monitoring and robotizing shoulder arthroplasty for training and optimization of suturing techniques. Int J CARS 3, 61–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0200-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0200-2

Keywords

Navigation