Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Calibrated segmentation of CBCT and CT images for digitization of dental prostheses

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

State of the art computer aided implant planning procedures typically use a surgical template to transfer the digital 3D planning to the operating room. This surgical template can be generated based on an acrylic copy of the patient’s removable prosthesis—the so-called radiographic guide—which is digitized using a CBCT or CT scanner. Since the same accurate fit between the surgical template and the patient as with the radiographic guide and the patient should be ensured, a procedure to accurately digitize this guide is needed.

Methods

A procedure is created to accurately digitize radiographic guides based on a calibrated segmentation. Therefore, two steps have to be executed. First, during a calibration step a calibration object is CBCT or CT scanned and a calibration algorithm which results in an optimal threshold value is executed. Next the guide is CBCT or CT scanned and a 3D model is created using the obtained optimal threshold. To validate our method, we compared a high accuracy laser scanned copy of the guide with the generated 3D model by creating a distance map between both models.

Results

The procedure was performed for different CBCT and CT scanners, and the digitization error for each scanner was defined. The 90th percentile error measured on average 0.15 mm, which was always less than the applied voxel size for all CBCT and CT test scans.

Conclusions

The calibration procedure evaluated in this study solves the known problem of digitizing a radiographic guide based on non-standardized gray value CBCT images. The procedure can easily be executed by a clinician and allows an accurate digitization of a radiographic guide using a CBCT or CT scanner. Starting from this digitization, an accurate surgical template can be made which has a good fit on the patient’s remaining teeth and surrounding soft tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, Marchal G, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P (1998) An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17(5): 842–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blombäck U, Andersson M, Schutyser F, Pettersson A, Wendelhag I (2005) A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7(Suppl 1): S111–S120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikzad S, Azari A (2008) A novel stereolithographic surgical template for planning treatment involving a mandibular dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(7): 1446–1454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Riu G, Meloni SM, Pisano M, Massarelli O, Tullio A (2010) Computed tomography-guided implant surgery for dental rehabilitation in mandible reconstructed with a fibular free flap: description of the technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg

  5. Gillot L, Noharet R, Cannas B (2010) Guided surgery and presurgical prosthesis: preliminary results of 33 fully edentulous maxillae treated in accordance with the nobelguide protocol. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12(Suppl 1): e104–e113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johansson B, Friberg B, Nilson H (2009) Digitally planned, immediately loaded dental implants with prefabricated prostheses in the reconstruction of edentulous maxillae: a 1-year prospective, multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 11(3): 194–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yong LT, Moy PK (2008) Complications of computer-aided-design/computer-aided-machining-guided (NobelGuide) surgical implant placement: an evaluation of early clinical results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 10(3): 123–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scotti R, Pellegrino G, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G, Ciocca L (2010) Diagnostic value of nobelguide to minimize the need for reconstructive surgery of jaws before implant placement: a review. Quintessence Int 41(10): 809–814

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R (2007) Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 34(9): 816–821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W (2011) Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02070.x

  11. Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, Näsström K, Klinge B (2010) Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00285.x

  12. D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H (2010) Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00275.x

  13. Stumpel LJ (2010) Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00268.x

  14. Lorensen WE, Cline HE (1987) Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH: 163–169

  15. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P (1997) Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(2): 187–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1): 62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2): 239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Groeve P, Schutyser F, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P (2001) Registration of 3D photographs with spiral CT images for soft tissue simulation in maxillofacial surgery. Lect Notes Comp Sci(MICCAI) 2208: 991–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Draenert GF, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Müller S, Ehrenfeld M, Mueller-Lisse UG (2007) Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36(4): 198–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Draenert GF, Gebhart F, Neugebauer C, Mueller-Lisse UG (2008) Imaging of bone transplants in the maxillofacial area by NewTom 9000 cone-beam CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106(1): e31–e35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veerle Wouters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wouters, V., Mollemans, W. & Schutyser, F. Calibrated segmentation of CBCT and CT images for digitization of dental prostheses. Int J CARS 6, 609–616 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0556-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0556-6

Keywords

Navigation