Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard method—results of an in vitro study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-specific mandible reconstruction plates may be pre-bent to facilitate the surgical procedure. A method using transfer keys (TK) for repositioning pre-bent plates was compared with the standard method on mandibular models to evaluate its feasibility.

Method

Ten mandible models were used to pre-bend reconstruction plates. After plate fixing on the models, TK were fabricated. Plates and TK were removed and segmental resections were performed. The plates were replaced on the models by the standard method of determining the plate position using previous screw holes. Plates were removed and then relocated by use of the TK. To compare the accuracy of both methods, the distances between four corresponding points of the condyles and the mandibular rami were measured.

Results

The mean deviation of the absolute values from the initial values for the models between the condyles and the rami was 0.964 mm for the standard method and 0.821 mm for the TK method. To determine whether there was enlargement or shrinkage between the rami or the condyles, we analysed the relative values of the data. For the standard method, the mean deviation from the initial values was +0.178 mm; for the TK method, it was +0.080 mm. In both cases, the differences were not significant.

Conclusion

Pre-bent reconstruction plates using patient-specific 3D models can be useful in mandible reconstruction. The TK method was tested in vitro and shown to be as accurate as the standard method. The TK method may shorten the procedure and may be useful for secondary cases and cases where the pathology involves the outer corte of the mandible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saunders JR, Hirata RM, Jaques DA (1990) Definitive mandibular replacement using reconstruction plates. Am J Surg 160: 387–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchbinder D, Urken ML, Vickery C, Weinberg H, Biller HF (1991) Bone contouring and fixation in functional, primary microvascular mandibular reconstruction. Head Neck 13: 191–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinberg MJ, Collins SL (1998) A simple fixation device to preserve anatomic position during reconstruction of mandibular defects. Laryngoscope 108: 448–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vural E, Yuen JC (2007) Combining use of resin models with external fixation in mandibular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133: 603–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Binder WJ (2008) Custom-designed facial implants. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 16: 133–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisele DW, Richtsmeier WJ, Graybeal JC, Koch WM, Zinreich SJ (1994) Threedimensional models for head and neck tumor treatment planning. Laryngoscope 104: 433–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kernan BT, Wimsatt JA (2000) Use of a stereolithography model for accurate, preoperative adaptation of a reconstruction plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58: 349–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salgueiro M, Stevens M (2010) Experience with the use of prebent paltes for the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 3: 201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Toro C, Robiony M, Costa M, Zerman N, Politi M (2007) Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction. Head Face Med 15(3): 5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ung F, Rocco JW, Deschler DG (2002) Temporary intraoperative external fixation in mandibular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 112: 1569–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ameerally PJ, Hollows P (2004) Use of an external fixator to stabilise the proximal mandibular segments during reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42: 354–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Louis PJ, Fernandes R (2001) Temporary stabilization of mandible with external fixation device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59: 1374–1375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohindra A, Blanco-Guzman MM (2009) Temporay mandibular stabilization during reconstruction: a alternative technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47: 399–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reece GP, Martin JW, Lemon JC, Jacob RF (1993) Mandible fragment fixation during reconstruction: the splint-and-plate technique. Ann Plast Surg 31: 128–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shippert R (2005) A study of time-dependent operating room fees and how to save $1,00,000 by using time-saving products. Am J Cosmet Surg 22: 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kermer C, Rasse M, Lagogiannis G, Undt G, Wagner A, Millesi W (1998) Colour stereolithography for planning complex maxillofacial tumour surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26: 360–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Wilde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilde, F., Plail, M., Riese, C. et al. Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard method—results of an in vitro study. Int J CARS 7, 57–63 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0599-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0599-8

Keywords

Navigation