Skip to main content
Log in

Intensity-based hierarchical elastic registration using approximating splines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

   We introduce a new hierarchical approach for elastic medical image registration using approximating splines. In order to obtain the dense deformation field, we employ Gaussian elastic body splines (GEBS) that incorporate anisotropic landmark errors and rotation information. Since the GEBS approach is based on a physical model in form of analytical solutions of the Navier equation, it can very well cope with the local as well as global deformations present in the images by varying the standard deviation of the Gaussian forces.

Methods

   The proposed GEBS approximating model is integrated into the elastic hierarchical image registration framework, which decomposes a nonrigid registration problem into numerous local rigid transformations. The approximating GEBS registration scheme incorporates anisotropic landmark errors as well as rotation information. The anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties can be estimated directly from the image data, and in this case, they represent the minimal stochastic localization error, i.e., the Cramér-Rao bound. The rotation information of each landmark obtained from the hierarchical procedure is transposed in an additional angular landmark, doubling the number of landmarks in the GEBS model.

Results

   The modified hierarchical registration using the approximating GEBS model is applied to register 161 image pairs from a digital mammogram database. The obtained results are very encouraging, and the proposed approach significantly improved all registrations comparing the mean-square error in relation to approximating TPS with the rotation information. On artificially deformed breast images, the newly proposed method performed better than the state-of-the-art registration algorithm introduced by Rueckert et al. (IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721, 1999). The average error per breast tissue pixel was less than 2.23 pixels compared to 2.46 pixels for Rueckert’s method.

Conclusion

   The proposed hierarchical elastic image registration approach incorporates the GEBS approximation scheme extended with anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties as well as rotation information. Our experimental results show that the proposed scheme improved the registration result significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/ipa/pix/mias.

References

  1. Maintz JBA, Viergever MA (1998) A survey of medical image registration. Med Im Anal 2(1):1–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Modersitzki J (2004) Numerical methods for image registration. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  3. Crum WR, Hartkens T, Hill DLG (2004) Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. British J Radiol 77(special issue):S140–S153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill DLG, Bathcelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ (2001) Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 46:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zitova B, Flusser J (2003) Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis Comput 21(11):977–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bookstein FL (1989) Principal warps: thin-plate splines decomposition of deformation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11:567–585

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DLG, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis M, Khotanzad A, Flaming D, Harms S (1997) A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3D image matching. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(3):317–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohlrausch J, Rohr K, Stiehl H (2001) A new class of elastic body splines for nonrigid registration of medical images. In: Handels H, Horsch A, Lehmann T, Meinzer H-P (eds) Proceedings of the workshop Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin (BVM’01). Informatik aktuell 36. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 164–168

  10. Rohr K, Sprengel R, Stiehl HS (1997) Incorporation of landmark error ellipsoids for image registration based on approximating thin-plate splines. In: Proceedings of the computer assisted radiology and surgery (CAR ’97), pp 234–239

  11. Rohr K (1998) Image registration based on thin-plate splines and local estimates of anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI ’98), pp 1174–1183

  12. Wörz S, Rohr K (2006) New approximating Gaussian elastic body splines for landmark-based registration of medical images. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin, pp 206–210

  13. Bookstein FL, Green DK (1993) A feature space for edgels in images with landmarks. J Math Imaging Vision 3:231–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis J, Hwang HJ, Neumann U, Enciso R (2004) Smart point landmark distribution for thin-plate splines. In: Proceeding of SPIE medical imaging, pp. 1236–1243

  15. Mardia KV, Kent JT (1996) Kriging and splines with derivative information. Biometrika 83:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rohr K, Fornefett M, Stiehl HS (2003) Spline-based elastic image registration: integration of landmark errors and orientation attributes. Comput Vis Image Underst 90:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Serifovic-Trbalic A, Demirovic D, Prljaca N, Szekely G, Cattin P (2009) Intensity based elastic registration incorporating anisotropic landmark errors and rotational information. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (JCARS) 4(5):463–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Andronache A, Cattin P, Szekely G (2005) Adaptive subdivision for hierarchical non-rigid registration of multi-modal images using mutual information. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 90:976–983

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen Y, Dass S, Ross A, Jain A (2005) Fingerprint deformation models using minutiae locations and orientations. Appl Comput Vis IEEE Workshop Motion Video Comput 1:150–155

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chou P, Pagano N (1992) Elasticity—tensor, dyadic, and engineering approaches. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gefen A, Dilmoney B (2007) Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast. J Technol Health Care 15(4):259–271

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amira Serifovic-Trbalic.

Additional information

This work has been supported by the SCOPES program of the Swiss National Science Foundation (http://www.snf.ch).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serifovic-Trbalic, A., Demirovic, D. & Cattin, P.C. Intensity-based hierarchical elastic registration using approximating splines. Int J CARS 9, 21–27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0906-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0906-7

Keywords