Skip to main content
Log in

Joint registration of ultrasound, CT and a shape+pose statistical model of the lumbar spine for guiding anesthesia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Facet joint injections and epidural needle insertions are widely used for spine anesthesia. Accurate needle placement is important for effective therapy delivery and avoiding complications arising from damage of soft tissue and nerves. Needle guidance is usually performed by fluoroscopy or palpation, resulting in radiation exposure and multiple needle re-insertions. Several ultrasound (US)-based approaches have been proposed but have not found wide acceptance in clinical routine. This is mainly due to difficulties in interpretation of the complex spinal anatomy in US, which leads to clinicians’ lack of confidence in relying only on information derived from US for needle guidance.

Methods

We introduce a multimodal joint registration technique that takes advantage of easy-to-interpret preprocedure computed topography (CT) scans of the lumbar spine to concurrently register a shape+pose model to the intraprocedure 3D US. Common shape coefficients are assumed between two modalities, while pose coefficients are specific to each modality.

Results

The joint method was evaluated on patient data consisting of ten pairs of US and CT scans of the lumbar spine. It was successfully applied in all cases and yielded an RMS shape error of 2.1 mm compared to the CT ground truth. The joint registration technique was compared to a previously proposed method of statistical model to US registration Rasoulian et al. (Information processing in computer-assisted interventions. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–60, 2013). The joint framework improved registration accuracy to US in 7 out of 17 visible vertebrae, belonging to four patients. In the remaining cases, the two methods were equally accurate.

Conclusion

The joint registration allows visualization and augmentation of important anatomy in both the US and CT domain and improves the registration accuracy in both modalities. Observing the patient-specific model in the CT domain allows the clinicians to assess the local registration accuracy qualitatively, which is likely to increase their confidence in using the US model for deriving needle guidance decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdi S, Datta S, Lucas LF (2005) Role of epidural steroids in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain Phys 8(1):127–43

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boswell MV, Colson JD, Spillane WF (2005) Therapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain Phys 8(1):101–114

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brudfors M, Seitel A, Rasoulian A, Lasso A, Lessoway VA, Osborn J, Maki A, Rohling RN, Abolmaesumi P (2015) Towards real-time, tracker-less 3D ultrasound guidance for spine anaesthesia. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(6):855–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Center P, Covington L, Parr A (2009) Lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain: a systematic review. Pain Phys 12(1):163–188

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen EC, Mousavi P, Gill S, Fichtinger G, Abolmaesumi P (2010) Ultrasound guided spine needle insertion. In: SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 762,538–762,538

  6. Conroy PH, Luyet C, McCartney CJ, McHardy PG (2013) Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia: a prospective observational study of a new approach. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2013:525818. doi:10.1155/2013/525818

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. de Oliveira Filho GR (2002) The construction of learning curves for basic skills in anesthetic procedures: an application for the cumulative sum method. Anesth Analg 95(2):411–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glocker B, Zikic D, Konukoglu E, Haynor DR, Criminisi A (2013) Vertebrae localization in pathological spine CT via dense classification from sparse annotations. In: MICCAI 2013—16th international conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention. Springer, Berlin. http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=192918

  9. Hacihaliloglu I, Rasoulian A, Rohling RN, Abolmaesumi P (2013) Statistical shape model to 3D ultrasound registration for spine interventions using enhanced local phase features. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2013. Springer, Berlin, pp 361–368

  10. Khallaghi S, Mousavi P, Gong RH, Gill S, Boisvert J, Fichtinger G, Pichora D, Borschneck D, Abolmaesumi P (2010) Registration of a statistical shape model of the lumbar spine to 3D ultrasound images. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2010. Springer, Berlin, pp 68–75

  11. Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL (2005) A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 101(6):1634–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loizides A, Peer S, Plaikner M, Spiss V, Galiano K, Obernauer J, Gruber H (2011) Ultrasound-guided injections in the lumbar spine. Med Ultrason 13(1):54–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore J, Clarke C, Bainbridge D, Wedlake C, Wiles A, Pace D, Peters T (2009) Image guidance for spinal facet injections using tracked ultrasound. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2009. Springer, Berlin, pp 516–523

  14. Myronenko A, Song X (2010) Point set registration: coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(12):2262–2275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Niazi A, Chin K, Jin R, Chan V (2014) Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia using the SonixGPS ultrasound guidance system: a feasibility study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 58(7):875–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rasoulian A, Rohling R, Abolmaesumi P (2013) Lumbar spine segmentation using a statistical multi-vertebrae anatomical shape+pose model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(10):1890–1900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasoulian A, Rohling RN, Abolmaesumi P (2013) Augmentation of paramedian 3D ultrasound images of the spine. In: Information processing in computer-assisted interventions. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–60

  18. Rasoulian A, Seitel A, Osborn J, Sojoudi S, Nouranian S, Lessoway VA, Rohling RN, Abolmaesumi P (2015) Ultrasound-guided spinal injections: a feasibility study of a guidance system. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(9):1417–1425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin DI (2007) Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain. Neurol Clin 25(2):353–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silbergleit R, Mehta BA, Sanders WP, Talati SJ (2001) Imaging-guided injection techniques with fluoroscopy and ct for spinal pain management 1. Radiographics 21(4):927–939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sprigge J, Harper S (2008) Accidental dural puncture and post dural puncture headache in obstetric anaesthesia: presentation and management: a 23-year survey in a district general hospital. Anaesthesia 63(1):36–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tran D, Kamani AA, Al-Attas E, Lessoway VA, Massey S, Rohling RN (2010) Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle. Can J Anesth 57(4):313–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ungi T, Abolmaesumi P, Jalal R, Welch M, Ayukawa I, Nagpal S, Lasso A, Jaeger M, Borschneck DP, Fichtinger G, Mousavi P (2012) Spinal needle navigation by tracked ultrasound snapshots. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(10):2766–2772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan CX, Goulet B, Pelletier J, Chen SJS, Tampieri D, Collins DL (2011) Towards accurate, robust and practical ultrasound-CT registration of vertebrae for image-guided spine surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6(4):523–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoon SH, O’Brien SL, Tran M (2013) Ultrasound guided spine injections: advancement over fluoroscopic guidance? Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 1(2):104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delaram Behnami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest

Human and animal rights

No new patient data were acquired for this work by any of the authors. This work does not contain any studies with animals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Behnami, D., Seitel, A., Rasoulian, A. et al. Joint registration of ultrasound, CT and a shape+pose statistical model of the lumbar spine for guiding anesthesia. Int J CARS 11, 937–945 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1369-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1369-4

Keywords

Navigation