Skip to main content
Log in

Improved electromagnetic tracking for catheter path reconstruction with application in high-dose-rate brachytherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Electromagnetic (EM) catheter tracking has recently been introduced in order to enable prompt and uncomplicated reconstruction of catheter paths in various clinical interventions. However, EM tracking is prone to measurement errors which can compromise the outcome of the procedure. Minimizing catheter tracking errors is therefore paramount to improve the path reconstruction accuracy.

Methods

An extended Kalman filter (EKF) was employed to combine the nonlinear kinematic model of an EM sensor inside the catheter, with both its position and orientation measurements. The formulation of the kinematic model was based on the nonholonomic motion constraints of the EM sensor inside the catheter. Experimental verification was carried out in a clinical HDR suite. Ten catheters were inserted with mean curvatures varying from 0 to \(6.6~\hbox {m}^{-1}\) in a phantom. A miniaturized Ascension (Burlington, Vermont, USA) trakSTAR EM sensor (model 55) was threaded within each catheter at various speeds ranging from 7.4 to \(32.1~\hbox {mm}\,\hbox {s}^{-1}\). The nonholonomic EKF was applied on the tracking data in order to statistically improve the EM tracking accuracy. A sample reconstruction error was defined at each point as the Euclidean distance between the estimated EM measurement and its corresponding ground truth. A path reconstruction accuracy was defined as the root mean square of the sample reconstruction errors, while the path reconstruction precision was defined as the standard deviation of these sample reconstruction errors. The impacts of sensor velocity and path curvature on the nonholonomic EKF method were determined. Finally, the nonholonomic EKF catheter path reconstructions were compared with the reconstructions provided by the manufacturer’s filters under default settings, namely the AC wide notch and the DC adaptive filter.

Results

With a path reconstruction accuracy of 1.9 mm, the nonholonomic EKF surpassed the performance of the manufacturer’s filters (2.4 mm) by 21% and the raw EM measurements (3.5 mm) by 46%. Similarly, with a path reconstruction precision of 0.8 mm, the nonholonomic EKF surpassed the performance of the manufacturer’s filters (1.0 mm) by 20% and the raw EM measurements (1.7 mm) by 53%. Path reconstruction accuracies did not follow an apparent trend when varying the path curvature and sensor velocity; instead, reconstruction accuracies were predominantly impacted by the position of the EM field transmitter (\( p\le 0.01\)).

Conclusion

The advanced nonholonomic EKF is effective in reducing EM measurement errors when reconstructing catheter paths, is robust to path curvature and sensor speed, and runs in real time. Our approach is promising for a plurality of clinical procedures requiring catheter reconstructions, such as cardiovascular interventions, pulmonary applications (Bender et al. in medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 99. Springer, Berlin, pp 981–989, 1999), and brachytherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The path curvature \(\kappa _p\) at each point p with coordinates xyz was defined as:

    \(\kappa _p=\frac{\sqrt{(z''\cdot y'-y''\cdot z')^2+(x''\cdot z'-z''\cdot x')^2+(y''\cdot x'-x''\cdot y')^2}}{(x'^2 +y'^2+ z'^2)^{3/2}}\) where each prime denotes the gradient.

References

  1. Bender H-J, Männer R, Poliwoda C, Roth S, Walz M (1999) Reconstruction of 3d catheter paths from 2d x-ray projections. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 99, vol 1679. Springer, Berlin, pp 981–989

  2. Bharat S, Kung C, Dehghan E, Ravi A, Venugopal N, Bonillas A, Stanton D, Kruecker J (2014) Electromagnetic tracking for catheter reconstruction in ultrasound-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate. Brachytherapy 13(6):640–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitaker M, Hruby G, Lovett A, Patanjali N (2011) Prostate hdr brachytherapy catheter displacement between planning and treatment delivery. Radiother Oncol 101(3):490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simnor T, Li S, Lowe G, Ostler P, Bryant L, Chapman C, Inchley D, Hoskin PJ (2009) Justification for inter-fraction correction of catheter movement in fractionated high dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 93(2):253–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bø LE, Leira HO, Tangen GA, Hofstad EF, Amundsen T, Langø T (2012) Accuracy of electromagnetic tracking with a prototype field generator in an interventional or setting. Med Phys 39(1):399–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feuerstein M, Reichl T, Vogel J, Traub J, Navab N (2009) Magneto-optical tracking of flexible laparoscopic ultrasound: model-based online detection and correction of magnetic tracking errors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(6):951–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. May 2016. [Online]. www.sjm.com//media/pro/therapies/mediguide/8350-mediguide-1114-0022-brochure-r3final

  8. Zhou J, Sebastian E, Mangona D, and Yan V (2013) Real-time catheter tracking for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using an electromagnetic 3d-guidance device: a preliminary performance study. Med Phys 40(2):021716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicolae AM, Bharat S, Kung C, Venugopal N, Dehghan E, Bonillas A, Stanton D, Kruecker J, Ravi A (2014) Electromagnetic catheter digitization in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning. Brachytherapy 13:S41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehrtash A, Damato A, Pernelle G, Barber L, Farhat N, Viswanathan A, Cormack R, Kapur T (2014) Em-navigated catheter placement for gynecologic brachytherapy: an accuracy study. In: Proceedings of SPIE 9036, Medical imaging 2014: image-guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling, 90361F. doi:10.1117/12.2044381

  11. Condino S, Calabrò EM, Alberti A, Parrini S, Cioni R, Berchiolli RN, Gesi M, Ferrari V, Ferrari M (2014) Simultaneous tracking of catheters and guidewires: comparison to standard fluoroscopic guidance for arterial cannulation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 47(1):53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Damato AL, Viswanathan AN, Don SM, Hansen JL, Cormack RA (2014) A system to use electromagnetic tracking for the quality assurance of brachytherapy catheter digitization. Med Phys 41(10):101702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poulin E, Racine E, Binnekamp D, Beaulieu L (2015) Fast, automatic, and accurate catheter reconstruction in hdr brachytherapy using an electromagnetic 3d tracking system. Med Phys 42(3):1227–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kindratenko V (2000) A survey of electromagnetic position tracker calibration techniques. Virtual Real 5(3):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lugez E, Sadjadi H, Pichora DR, Ellis RE, Akl SG, Fichtinger G (2015) Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(3):253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. LaScalza S, Arico J, Hughes R (2003) Effect of metal and sampling rate on accuracy of flock of birds electromagnetic tracking system. J Biomech 36:141–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson E, Yaniv Z, Zhang H, Nafis C, Shen E, Shechter G, Wiles AD, Peters T, Lindisch D, Cleary K (2007) A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi center study. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6509, Medical imaging 2007: visualization and image-guided procedures, 65092T. doi:10.1117/12.712701

  18. Ascension Technology Corporation. 3D Guidance trakSTAR 2, Installation and Operation Guide

  19. Lugez E, Sadjadi H, Akl SG, Fichtinger G (2015) Nonholonomic catheter path reconstruction using electromagnetic tracking. In: Proceedings of SPIE 9415, Medical imaging 2015: image-guided procedures, Robotic interventions, and modeling, 94150L. doi:10.1117/12.2081561

  20. Welch G, Bishop G (2006) An introduction to the kalman filter. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bloch AM, Marsden JE, Zenkov DV (2005) Nonholonomic dynamics. Notices AMS 52(3):320–329

    Google Scholar 

  22. Duindam V, Xu J, Alterovitz R, Sastry S, Goldberg K (2010) Three-dimensional motion planning algorithms for steerable needles using inverse kinematics. Int J Robot Research 29(7):789–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Webster RJ, Kim JS, Cowan NJ, Chirikjian GS, Okamura AM (2006) Nonholonomic modeling of needle steering. Int J Robot Res 25(5–6):509–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Den Berg J, Patil S, Alterovitz R, Abbeel P, Goldberg K (2011) Lqg-based planning, sensing, and control of steerable needles. In: Algorithmic foundations of robotics IX. Springer, Berlin, vol 68, pp 373–389

  25. Patil S, Burgner J, Webster RJ, Alterovitz R (2014) Needle steering in 3-d via rapid replanning. IEEE Trans Robot 30(4):853–864

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 5:698–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sadjadi H, Hashtrudi-Zaad K, Fichtinger G (2014) Needle deflection estimation: prostate brachytherapy phantom experiments. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(6):921–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sadjadi Hossein, Hashtrudi-Zaad Keyvan, Fichtinger Gabor (2016) Simultaneous localization and calibration for electromagnetic tracking systems. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 12(2):189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadjadi Hossein, Hashtrudi-Zaad Keyvan, Fichtinger Gabor (2016) Simultaneous electromagnetic tracking and calibration for dynamic field distortion compensation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63(8):1771–1781

  30. Tiong A, Bydder S, Ebert M, Caswell N, Waterhouse D, Spry N, Camille P, Joseph D (2010) A small tolerance for catheter displacement in high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy is necessary and feasible. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(4):1066–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hastenteufel M, Vetter M, Meinzer H-P, Wolf I (2006) Effect of 3d ultrasound probes on the accuracy of electromagnetic tracking systems. Ultrasound Med Biol 32(9):1359–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lugez E, Pichora D, Akl S, Ellis R (2014) Intraoperative ct scanning impact on electromagnetic tracking performance. Int J CARS 9(Suppl 1):S107–S108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elodie Lugez.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Gabor Fichtinger was supported as Cancer Care Ontario Research Chair. Chandra Joshi was supported by the Ride for Dad Foundation, Kingston - Prostate Cancer Research Grant 2013.

Conflict of interest

Elodie Lugez, Hossein Sadjadi, Chandra P. Joshi, Selim G. Akl, and Gabor Fichtinger declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This articles does not contain patient data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lugez, E., Sadjadi, H., Joshi, C.P. et al. Improved electromagnetic tracking for catheter path reconstruction with application in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J CARS 12, 681–689 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1534-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1534-4

Keywords

Navigation