Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a novel multi-articulated endoscope: proof of concept through a virtual simulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

In endoscopic surgery such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and laparoscopic surgery, providing the surgeon a good view of the target is important. Rigid endoscope has for years been the go-to tool for this purpose, but it has certain limitations like the inability to work around obstacles. To improve on current tools, a novel multi-articulated endoscope (MAE) is currently under development. To investigate its feasibility and possible value, we performed a user test using virtual prototype of the MAE with the intent to show that it outperforms the conventional endoscope while bringing minimal additional burden to the operator.

Methods

To evaluate the prototype, we built a virtual model of the MAE and a rigid oblique-viewing endoscope. Through a comparative user study we evaluate the ability of each device to visualize certain targets placed inside the virtual chest cavity by the angle between the visual axis of the scope and the normal of the plane of the target, while accounting for the usability of each endoscope by recording the time taken for each task. In addition, we collected a questionnaire from each participant to obtain feedback.

Results

The angles obtained using the MAE were smaller on average (\(p = 0.01, \text {MD} = 7.25\)), indicating that better visualization can be achieved through the proposed method. A nonsignificant difference in mean time taken for each task in favor of the rigid endoscope was also found (\(p = 0.42, \text {MD} = -2.09\)).

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that better visualization for endoscopic surgery can be achieved through our novel MAE. The scope may bring about a paradigm shift in the field of minimally invasive surgery by providing more freedom in viewpoint selection, enabling surgeons to perform more elaborate procedures in minimally invasive settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson TN, Stiegmann GV (2004) Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy 36:48–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K (2000) Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1644–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boffa DJ, Dhamija A, Kosinski AS, Kim AW, Detterbeck FC, Mitchell JD, Onaitis MW, Paul S (2014) Fewer complications result from a video-assisted approach to anatomic resection of clinical stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148:637–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, Peeceeyen S, Yan TD (2012) Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 16:244–249

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng D, Downey RJ, Kernstine K, Stanbridge R, Shennib H, Wolf R, Ohtsuka T, Schmid R, Waller D, Fernando H, Yim A, Martin J (2007) Video-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer resection: a meta-analysis and systematic review of controlled trials. Innov Technol Techn Cardiothorac Vasc Surg 2:261–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Licht PB, Ladegaard L (2010) Flexible thoracoscopy may facilitate video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. World J Surg 34:1470–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee P, Colt HG (2005) Rigid and semirigid pleuroscopy: the future is bright. Respirology 10:418–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen K, Bjerrum F, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Pedersen JH, Konge L (2015) A new possibility in thoracoscopic virtual reality simulation training: development and testing of a novel virtual reality simulator for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 21:420–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao K, Matsui T, Furukawa H, Yao T, Sakurai T, Mitsuyasu T (2002) A new stereoscopic endoscopy system: accurate 3-dimensional measurement in vitro and in vivo with distortion-correction function. Gastrointest Endosc 55:412–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, Knoll T (2012) Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol 26:1085–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1999) Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 13:371–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patil PV, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2004) Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments plane on monitor image and surgical performance. Surg Endosc Other Interv Techn 18:111–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ota T, Degani A, Schwartzman D, Zubiate B, McGarvey J, Choset H, Zenati MA (2008) A novel highly articulated robotic surgical system for epicardial ablation. In: 30th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 250–253

  14. Degani A, Choset H, Wolf A, Zenati MA (2006) Highly articulated robotic probe for minimally invasive surgery. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 4167–4172

  15. Ikuta K, Nokata M, Aritomi S (1998) Hyper redundant active endoscope for minimally invasive surgery. J Robot Soc Jpn 16:569–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ikuta K, Tsukamoto M, Hirose S (1988) Shape memory alloy servo actuator system with electric resistance feedback and application for active endoscope. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 427–430

  17. Shang J, Noonan DP, Payne C, Clark J, Sodergren MH, Darzi A, Yang GZ (2011) An articulated universal joint based flexible access robot for minimally invasive surgery. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 1147–1152

  18. Rivera-Serrano CM, Johnson P, Zubiate B, Kuenzler R, Choset H, Zenati M, Tully S, Duvvuri U (2012) A transoral highly flexible robot. Laryngoscope 122:1067–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meng WC, Kwok SP, Leung KL, Chung CC, Lau WY, Li AK (1996) Optimal position of working ports in laparoscopic surgery: an in vitro study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 6:278–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Polet R, Donnez J (2008) Using a laparoscope manipulator (LAPMAN) in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Surg Technol Int 17:187–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gillen S, Pletzer B, Heiligensetzer A, Wolf P, Kleeff J, Feussner H, Frst A (2014) Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 28:164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by a grant from the Advanced Science, Technology and Management Research Institute/Kyoto city fund for the promotion of medical industry through support for research and small-to-medium sized enterprises.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshihiko Sato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karvonen, T., Muranishi, Y., Yamamoto, G. et al. Evaluation of a novel multi-articulated endoscope: proof of concept through a virtual simulation. Int J CARS 12, 1123–1130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1599-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1599-0

Keywords

Navigation