Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

3D surface voxel tracing corrector for accurate bone segmentation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

For extremely close bones, their boundaries are weak and diffused due to strong interaction between adjacent surfaces. These factors prevent the accurate segmentation of bone structure. To alleviate these difficulties, we propose an automatic method for accurate bone segmentation. The method is based on a consideration of the 3D surface normal direction, which is used to detect the bone boundary in 3D CT images.

Methods

Our segmentation method is divided into three main stages. Firstly, we consider a surface tracing corrector combined with Gaussian standard deviation \(\sigma \) to improve the estimation of normal direction. Secondly, we determine an optimal value of \(\sigma \) for each surface point during this normal direction correction. Thirdly, we construct the 1D signal and refining the rough boundary along the corrected normal direction. The value of \(\sigma \) is used in the first directional derivative of the Gaussian to refine the location of the edge point along accurate normal direction. Because the normal direction is corrected and the value of \(\sigma \) is optimized, our method is robust to noise images and narrow joint space caused by joint degeneration.

Results

We applied our method to 15 wrists and 50 hip joints for evaluation. In the wrist segmentation, Dice overlap coefficient (DOC) of \(97.62 \pm 0.57\)% was obtained by our method. In the hip segmentation, fivefold cross-validations were performed for two state-of-the-art methods. Forty hip joints were used for training in two state-of-the-art methods, 10 hip joints were used for testing and performing comparisons. The DOCs of \(97.34 \pm 0.56\%\), \(98.06\pm 0.58\)%, and \(97.73 \pm 0.47\)% were achieved by our method for the pelvis, the left femoral head and the right femoral head, respectively.

Conclusion

Our method was shown to improve segmentation accuracy for several specific challenging cases. The results demonstrate that our approach achieved a superior accuracy over two state-of-the-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hangartner TN (2007) Thresholding technique for accurate analysis of density and geometry in QCT, pQCT and microct images. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 7(1):9–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan FHY, Lam FK, Zhu H (1998) Adaptive thresholding by variational method. IEEE Trans Image Process 7(3):468–473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burghardt AJ, Kazakia GJ, Majumdar S (2007) A local adaptive threshold strategy for high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone. Ann Biomed Eng 35(10):1678–1686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng YZ, Zhou SJ, Wang YD, Guo CY, Bai J, Tamura S (2013) Automatic segmentation technique for acetabulum and femoral head in CT images. Pattern Recogn 46(11):2969–2984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mishra AK, Fieguth PW, Clausi DA (2011) Decoupled active contour (DAC) for boundary detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33(2):310–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu MH, Thompson PM, Toga AW (2004) An adaptive level set segmentation on a triangulated mesh. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(2):191–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adiga PSU, Chaudhuri BB (2001) An efficient method based on watershed and rule-based merging for segmentation of 3-D histo-pathological images. Pattern Recogn 34(7):1449–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grau V, Mewes AUJ, Alcaniz M, Kikinis R, Warfield SK (2004) Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(4):447–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yokota F, Okada T, Takao M, Sugano N, Tada Y, Tomiyama N, Sato Y (2013) Automated ct segmentation of diseased hip using hierarchical and conditional statistical shape models. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 190–197

  10. Chandra SS, Xia Y, Engstrom C, Crozier S, Schwarz R, Fripp J (2014) Focused shape models for hip joint segmentation in 3D magnetic resonance images. Med Image Anal 18(3):567–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmid J, Kim J, Magnenat Thalmann N (2011) Robust statistical shape models for mri bone segmentation in presence of small field of view. Med Image Anal 50:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindner C, Thiagarajah S, Wilkinson JM, arcOGEN Consortium, WallisG, Cootes TF (2013) Fully automatic segmentation of the proximal femur using random forest regression voting. IEEE Trans Med Imag32(8):1462–1472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamecker H, Seeba M, Hege HC, Deuflhard P (2004) A 3d statistical shape model of the pelvic bone for segmentation. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2004, vol 5370. Fitzpatrick, pp 1341C–1351

  14. Snel JG, Venema HW, Grimberge CA (2002) Deformable triangular surfaces using fast 1-D radial lagrangian dynamics-segmentation of 3-D MR and CT images of the wrist. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(8):888–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastian TB, Tek H, Crisco JJ, Kimia BB (2003) Segmentation of carpal bones from CT images using skeletally coupled deformable models. Med Image Anal 7(1):21–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammad AA, Rasoulian A, Seitel A, Darras K, Wilson D, John P, Pichora D, Mousavi P, Rohling R, Abolmaesumi P (2016) Automatic segmentation of wrist bones in CT using a statistical wrist shape + pose models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(8):1789–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yao WG, Abolmaesumi P, Greenspan M, Ellis RE (2005) An estimation/correction algorithm for detecting bone edges in CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24(8):997–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Qu XQ, Li XB (1996) A 3D surface tracking algorithm. Comput Vis Image Underst 64(1):147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zoroofi R, Sato Y, Sasama T, Nishii T, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Tamura S (2004) Automated segmentation of acetabulum and femoral head from 3-DCT images. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 7(4):329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26(3):297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 64(1):62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonzalez R, Woods R (eds) (2002) Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  23. Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:679–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shi CF, Cheng YZ, Liu F, Wang YD, Bai J, Tamura S (2016) A hierarchical local region-based sparse shape composition for liver segmentation in ct scans. Pattern Recogn 50:88–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi C, Cheng Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Mori K, Tamura S (2017) Low-rank and sparse decomposition based shape model and probabilistic atlas for automatic pathological organ segmentation. Med Image Anal 38:30–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Suk HI, Lee SW, Shen D (2014) Hierarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis. NeuroImage 26(3):569–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ciompi F, de Hoop SJ, van Riel Band, Chung K, Scholten ET (2015) Automatic classification of pulmonary peri-fissural nodules in computed tomography using an ensemble of 2D views and a convolutional neural network out-of-the-box. Med Image Anal 26(1):195–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and helpful suggestions that greatly improved the papers quality. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61571158, 61741106 and 61702135.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanzhi Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 67 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, H., Song, S., Wang, J. et al. 3D surface voxel tracing corrector for accurate bone segmentation. Int J CARS 13, 1549–1563 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1804-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1804-9

Keywords