Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Robotic fetal ultrasonography platform with a passive scan mechanism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The shortage of obstetricians and gynecologists has intensified in developed countries. Our long-term goal is to develop a robotic prenatal care platform for automatic ultrasound (US) scanning to improve the workflow efficiency of obstetricians and gynecologists. This paper develops a hardware platform for the positioning of the US probe to obtain diagnostic US images while satisfying safety requirements of the fetus and pregnant woman.

Method

The proposed system includes a mechanism that maintains the contact force in a certain range and passively adjusts the US probe posture relative to the body surface. The system is designed according to clinical survey data. For proof of concept, we conducted a robotic US scan with an agar phantom and three pregnant women under the operation of a physician.

Results

Experimental results show the passive US scan motion followed the phantom surface with an acceptable contact force (< 15 N). Clinical trials were safely carried out with observations of fetal body parts.

Conclusion

Our proposed platform acquired US images with satisfactory contact forces in the phantom study. The feasibility of the platform was demonstrated in a clinical study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simon AE, Uddin SFG (2017) Trends in seeing an obstetrician-gynecologist compared with a general physician among U.S. Women, 2000–2015. Obstet Gynecol 130(4):677–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishikawa T, Ohba H, Yokooka Y, Nakamura K, Ogasawara K (2013) Forecasting the absolute and relative shortage of physicians in Japan using a system dynamics model approach. Hum Resour Health 11(41):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cresswell K, Graham R, Wright A, Garelick T, Yoong W (2018) Managing burnout in obstetrics and gynaecology. Obstet Gynaecol 21(1):7–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, Hernandez-Andrade E, Johnsen SL, Kalache K, Leung KY, Malinger G, Munoz H (2011) Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37(1):116–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Ville Y (2007) Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20–36 weeks’ gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(5):550–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maraci MA, Napolitano R, Papageorghiou A, Noble JA (2014) Searching for structures of interest in an ultrasound video sequence. In: Machine learning in medical imaging, pp 133–140

  7. Chan LW, Fung TY, Leung TY, Sahota DS, Lau TK (2009) Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(4):447–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Craig M (1985) Sonography: an occupational health hazard? J Diag Med Sonog 1(3):121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harms KL, Smith BS (1993) Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome and other work-related musculoskeletal problems in cardiac sonographers. J Occup Med 35(6):604–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Priester AM, Natarajan S, Culjat MO (2013) Robotic ultrasound systems in medicine. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 60(3):507–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koizumi N, Warisawa S, Nagoshi M, Hashizume H, Mitsuishi M (2009) Construction methodology for a remote ultrasound diagnostic system. IEEE Trans Robot 25(3):522–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abolmaesumi P, Salcudean SE, Zhu WH, Sirouspour MR, DiMaio SP (2002) Image-guided control of a robot for medical ultrasound. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 18(1):11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ito K, Sugano S, Iwata H (2010) Portable and attachable tele-echography robot system: FASTele. In: 2010 annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology, pp 487–490

  14. Mustafa AS, Ishii T, Matsunaga Y, Nakadate R, Ishii H, Ogawa K, Saito A, Sugawara M, Niki K, Takanishi A (2013) Development of robotic system for autonomous liver screening using ultrasound scanning device. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, pp 804–809

  15. Fang TY, Zhang HK, Finocchi R, Taylor RH, Boctor EM (2017) Force-assisted ultrasound imaging system through dual force sensing and admittance robot control. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(6):983–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arbeille P, Ruiz J, Herve P, Chevillot M, Poisson G, Perrotin F (2005) Fetal tele-echography using a robotic arm and a satellite link. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26(3):221–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, Housden S, Noh Y, Singh D, Singh A, Skelton E, Matthew J, Tan C, Back J, Lindenroth L, Gomez A, Toussaint N, Zimmer V, Knight C, Fletcher T, Lloyd D, Simpson J, Pasupathy D, Liu H, Althoefer K, Hajnal J, Razavi R, Rhode K (2019) Robotic-assisted ultrasound for fetal imaging: evolution from single-arm to dual-arm system. In: TAROS, pp 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang S, Housden RJ, Y, Singh D, Singh A, Lindenroth L, Liu H, Althoefer K, Hajnal J, Singh D, Rhode K (2019) Analysis of a customized clutch joint designed for the safety management of an ultrasound robot. Appl Sci 9(9):1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lacevic B, Rocco P, Zanchettin AM (2013) Safety assessment and control of robotic manipulators using danger field. IEEE Trans Robot 29(5):1257–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Okamura AM (2004) Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery. Ind Rob 31(6):499–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindenroth L, Soor A, Hutchinson J, Shafi A, Back J, Rhode K, Liu H (2017) Design of a soft, parallel end-effector applied to robot-guided ultrasound interventions. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 3716–3721

  22. Huang Q, Lan J, Li X (2018) Robotic arm based automatic ultrasound scanning for three-dimensional imaging. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics 15(2):1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Virga S, Zettinig O, Esposito M, Pfister K, Frisch B, Neff T, Navab N, Hennersperger C (2016) Automatic Force-Compliant Robotic Ultrasound Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 508–513

  24. Katayama M, Nomura H, Sasaki S, Ono C, Iwama H (2001) Ninshin No Keika Kara Mita Ninpu No Hukubu Toshyutsu Oyobi Youbu Wankyoku Joutai (Published in Japanese). Jap J Matern Heal 42(1):93–102

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldsmith A M, Pedersen P C, Szabo T L (2008) An inertial-optical tracking system for portable, quantitative, 3D ultrasound. In: 2008 IEEE ultrasonics symposium, pp 45–49

  26. Hafizah M, Kok T, Supriyanto E (2010) Development of 3D image reconstruction based on untracked 2D fetal phantom ultrasound images using VTK. WSEAS Trans Signal Process 6(4):145–154

    Google Scholar 

  27. Prevost R, Salehi M, Sprung J, Ladikos A, Bauer R, Wein W (2017) Deep learning for sensorless 3D freehand ultrasound imaging. In: MICCAI, pp 628–636

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan

    Ryosuke Tsumura & Hiroyasu Iwata

Authors
  1. Ryosuke Tsumura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroyasu Iwata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryosuke Tsumura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The clinical study protocol was approved by the research ethical review committee of Waseda University.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants individually.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 46168 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsumura, R., Iwata, H. Robotic fetal ultrasonography platform with a passive scan mechanism. Int J CARS 15, 1323–1333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02130-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02130-1

Keywords