Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An image-guided hybrid robot system for dental implant surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Dental implant surgery is an effective method for remediating the loss of teeth. Robot is expected to increase the accuracy of dental implant surgery. However, most of them are industrial serial robot, with low stiffness and non-unique inverse kinematic solution, which may reduce the success rate and safety of robotic surgery. Compared to serial robot, parallel robot is more stiffness and has unique inverse kinematic. However, its workspace is small, which may not meet surgical requirements. Therefore, a novel hybrid robot dedicated to dental implant is proposed.

Methods

The hybrid robot is composed of three translation joints, two revolute joints, and Stewart parallel manipulator. Stewart is used for performing surgical operation, while the joints are used for enlarging the workspace of Stewart. In order to ensure the safety of robot motion, physical human–robot interaction based on a variable admittance controller is applied in the robotic system. In addition, considering the small workspace of Stewart, an optimal model is proposed to minimize the joint movement of Stewart in adjusting the orientation of drill bit.

Results

Phantom experiments were carried out based on the prototype robot. In the experiments, the optimal model could be solved after 20 iterations, finding an ideal joint configuration. The proposed variable admittance controller could enhance comfort level effectively. The accuracy of robot is evaluated by angle, entry and exit deviation, which are 0.74 ± 0.25°, 0.93 ± 0.28 mm, and 0.96 ± 0.23 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

The phantom experiments validate the functionality of the proposed hybrid robot. The satisfactory performance makes it more widely used in the practical dental implant surgery in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keren SY, Daniel R (2015) An overview of the mechanical integrity of dental implants. Biomed Res Int 2015:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/547384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu Y, Wang F, Fan S, Chow KF (2019) Robotics in dental implantology. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 31(3):513–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang J, Zhang Y (2012) Application of robot to tooth-arrangement and dental implantology. Robot 34(5):634–640. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1218.2012.00634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun X, McKenzie FD, Bawab S, Li J, Yoon Y, Huang JK (2011) Automated dental implantation using image-guided robotics: registration results. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6:627–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0543-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun X., Yoon Y., Li J., McKenzie F. D. (2014) Automated image-guided surgery for common and complex dental implants. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 38(5): 251–259. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2014.913079

  6. Cao Z, Qin C, Fan S, Yu D, Wu Y, Qin J, Chen X (2020) Pilot stud-y of a surgical robot system for zygomatic implant placement. Med Eng Phys 75:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.07.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J, Shen Z, Xu WYT, Lam WYH, Hsung RTC, Pow EHN, Kosuge K, Wang Z (2019) A compact dental robotic system using soft bracing technique. IEEE Robot Automation Lett 4(2):1271–1278. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2894864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li J, Lam WYH, Hsung RTC, Pow EHN, Wang Z (2018) A customizable, compact robotic manipulator for assisting multiple dental procedures. In: 3rd international conference on advanced robotics and mechatronics (ICARM), pp 720–725. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARM.2018.8610773

  9. Gwangho K, Hojin S, Sungbeen I, Dongwan K, Sanghwa J (2009) A study on simulator of human-robot cooperative manipulator for dental implant surgery. IEEE Int Symp Ind Electron 2009:2159–2164. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2009.5222561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rawal S, Tillery DE Jr, Brewer P (2020) Robotic-assisted prosthetically driven planning and immediate placement of a dental implant. Compend Contin Educ Dent 41(1):26–31 (PMID: 31895579)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakano T, Sugita N, Ueta T, Tamaki Y, Mitsuishi M (2009) A parallel robot to assist vitreoretinal surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4(6):517–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-009-0374-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuang S, Leung KS, Wang T, Hu L, Chui E, Liu WY, Wang Y (2012) A novel passive/active hybrid robot for orthopaedic trauma surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 8(4):458–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shivesh K, Hendrik W, de Gea J, Fernández AM, Frank K (2020) A survey on modularity and distributivity in series-parallel hybrid robots. Mechatronics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2020.102367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng Y, Yu H, Du Z (2016) Design and kinematic analysis of a hybrid manipulator for spine surgery. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, pp 884–889. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA.2016.7558679

  15. Sharkawy AN, Koustoumpardis P, Aspragathos NA (2020) A neural network-based approach for variable admittance control in human–robot cooperation: online adjustment of the virtual inertia. Intel Serv Robot 13:495–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-020-00337-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Du Z, Wang W, Yan Z, Dong W, Wang W (2017) Variable admittance control based on fuzzy reinforcement learning for minimally invasive surgery manipulator. Sensors 17(4):844. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040844

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang G, Oh HS, Seo JK, Kim U, Choi HR (2019) Variable admittance control of robot manipulators based on human intention. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 24(3):1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2019.2910237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen X, Yuan J, Wang C, Huang Y, Kang L (2010) Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dentistry Rel Res 12(3):181–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00160.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X, Ye M, Lin Y, Wu Y, Wang C (2009) Image guided oral implantology and its application in the placement of zygoma implants. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 93(2):162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen X, Wu Y, Wang C (2011) Application of a surgical navigation system in the rehabilitation of maxillary defects using zygoma implants: report of one case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26(5):e29-34 (PMID: 22010098)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Qin C, Cao Z, Fan S, Wu Y, Sun Y, Constantinus P, Wang C, Chen X (2019) An oral and maxillofacial navigation system for implant placement with automatic identification of fiducial points. Int J CARS 14:281–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1870-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li S, Du Z, Yu H (2020) A robot-assisted spine surgery system based on intraoperative 2D fluoroscopy navigation. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979993

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen N (2016) The CMA evolution strategy: a tutorial. arXiv preprint arXiv: 604.00772

  24. Lopez-Franco C, Hernandez-Barragan J, Alanis AY, Arana-Daniel N (2018) A soft computing approach for inverse kinematics of robot manipulators. Eng Appl Artif Intell 74:104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Frösch L, Mukaddam K, Filippi A, Zitzmann NU, Kühl S (2019) Comparison of heat generation between guided and conventional implant surgery for single and sequential drilling protocols—an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 30(2):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li Y, Hu J, Tao B, Yu D, Shen Y, Fan S, Wu Y, Chen X (2020) Automatic robot-world calibration in an optical-navigated surgical robot system and its application for oral implant placement. Int J CARS 15:1685–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02232-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou W, Fan S, Wang F, Huang W, Jamjoom FZ, Wu Y (2020) A novel extraoral registration method for a dynamic navigation system guiding zygomatic implant placement in patients with maxillectomy defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(1):116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grants from National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB1302901).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to QingHua Liang or XiaoJun Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, Y., Fan, J., Tao, B. et al. An image-guided hybrid robot system for dental implant surgery. Int J CARS 17, 15–26 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02484-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02484-0

Keywords

Navigation