Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An integrated navigation system based on a dedicated breast support device for MRI-guided breast biopsy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Breast cancer is currently the cancer type with the highest incidence in the world, and it is extremely harmful to women’s health. MRI-guided breast biopsy is a common method in clinical examination of breast cancer. However, traditional breast biopsy is less accurate and takes a long time. In this study, an integrated navigation system (INS) based on a dedicated breast support device (DBSD) was proposed to assist doctors in biopsy.

Methods

The grid-shaped DBSD can reduce the displacement and deformation of the breast during the biopsy operation and is convenient for puncture. The robot system based on the DBSD is designed to assist doctors in performing puncture action. The software system has functions such as registration, path planning, and real-time tracking of biopsy needles based on the DBSD, which can assist doctors in completing the entire biopsy procedure. A series of experiments are designed to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the system.

Results

Experiments prove that the robot system has reasonable structure and meets the requirements of MR compatibility. The latency of the INS during intraoperative navigation is 0.30 ± 0.03 s. In the phantom puncture experiment, the puncture error under the navigation of the INS is 1.04 ± 0.15 mm.

Conclusion

The INS proposed in this paper can be applied to assist doctors in breast biopsy in MR environment, improve the accuracy of biopsy and shorten the time of biopsy. The experimental results show that the system is feasible and accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginsburg O, Yip CH, Brooks A, Cabanes A, Caleffi M, Dunstan Yataco JA, Gyawali B, McCormack V, McLaughlin de Anderson M, Mehrotra R, Mohar A, Murillo R, Pace LE, Paskett ED, Romanoff A, Rositch AF, Scheel JR, Schneidman M, Unger-Saldaña K, Vanderpuye V, Wu TY, Yuma S, Dvaladze A, Duggan C, Anderson BO (2020) Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation. Cancer 126:2379–2393. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Papalouka V, Kilburn-Toppin F, Gaskarth M, Gilbert F (2018) MRI-guided breast biopsy: A review of technique, indications, and radiological-pathological correlations. Clin Radiol 73(10):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fowler AM, Mankoff DA, Joe BN (2017) Imaging neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer. Radiology 285:358–375. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Evangelista L, Cuppari L, Burei M, Zorz A, Caumo F (2019) Head-to-head comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer. Clin Trans Imag 7(2):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-019-00319-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tse ZTH, Elhawary H, Rea M, Young I, Davis BL, Lamperth M (2009) A haptic unit designed for magnetic-resonance-guided biopsy. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 223(2):159–172. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119jeim468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Navarro-Alarcon D, Singh S, Zhang T, Chung HL, Ng KW, Chow MK, Liu Y (2017) Developing a compact robotic needle driver for MRI-guided breast biopsy in tight environments. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2(3):1648–1655. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2678542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christopherson KM, Smith SD (2018) How does MR imaging help care for my breast cancer patient? Perspective of a radiation oncologist. Magn Reson Imag Clin N Am 26(2):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2017.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor RH, Stoianovici D (2003) Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(5):765–781. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRA.2003.817058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan KG, Fielding T, Anvari M (2016) An image-guided automated robot for MRI breast biopsy. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 12(3):461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park SB, Kim J-G, Lim K-W, Yoon C-H, Kim D-J, Kang H-S, Jo Y-H (2017) A magnetic resonance image-guided breast needle intervention robot system: overview and design considerations. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(8):1319–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1528-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Groenhuis V, Veltman J, Siepel FJ, Stramigioli S (2017) Stormram3: a magnetic resonance imaging-compatible robotic system for breast biopsy. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 24(2):34–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2017.2680541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoianovici D, Jun C, Lim S, Li P, Petrisor D, Fricke S, Sharma K, Cleary K (2018) Multi-imager compatible, MR safe, remote center of motion needle-guide robot. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 65(1):165–177. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2017.2697766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patriciu A, Chen M, Iranpanah B, Sirouspour S (2014) A tissue stabilization device for MRI-guided breast biopsy. Med Eng Phys 36(9):1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gassert R, Yamamoto A, Chapuis D, Dovat L, Bleuler H, Burdet E (2006) Actuation methods for applications in MR environments. Concepts Magn Reson Part B: Magn Reson Eng 29B(4):191–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.20070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu W, Yang Z, Jiang S, Feng Di, Zhang D (2019) Design and implementation of a new cable-driven robot for MRI-guided breast biopsy. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 16(2):e2063. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wendong Wang, Yikai Shi, Xiaoqing Yuan, Andrew Goldenberg, Peyman Shokrollahi (2013) Compatibility of US motors for development of MRI-guided surgical robot. 2013 6th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/bmei.2013.6746969.

  18. Zhang G, Sun Q, Jiang S, Yang Z, Ma X, Jiang H (2017) Automatic seed picking for brachytherapy postimplant validation with 3D CT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(11):1985–1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1632-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 9(5):698–700. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1987.4767965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Golub GH, Reinsch C (1970) Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numer Math 14(5):403–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02163027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Flynn EAM, Wilson ARM, Michell MJ (2010) Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art. Clin Radiol 65(4):259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang S, PanLi YY, Liu J, Yang Z (2014) Experimental study of needle-tissue interaction forces: Effect of needle geometries, insertion methods and tissue characteristics. J Biomech 47(13):3344–3353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. El Khouli RH, Macura KJ, Barker PB, Elkady LM, Jacobs MA, Vogel-Claussen J, Bluemke D (2009) MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a phantom and patient evaluation of targeting accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(2):424–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21831

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51775368, 81871457). The authors are grateful to the Radiation Oncology Department of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital for providing the experimental environment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shan Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, C., Yang, Z., Jiang, S. et al. An integrated navigation system based on a dedicated breast support device for MRI-guided breast biopsy. Int J CARS 17, 993–1005 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02640-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02640-0

Keywords