Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CTSim: a numerical simulator of computed tomography for high-quality radiological education

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Computer-based simulation offers radiological students the possibility to experiment with computed tomography in a way not possible in class or in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to design a computed tomography numerical simulator (CTSim) for high-quality radiological education.

Methods

In this study, a CTSim is designed based on the mathematical and physical principles of CT imaging. The proposed CTSim includes pen-beam module, fan-beam module, and clinical CT module. The core design of the software includes four parts: the construction of sample models, construction of imaging parameters and artifact parameters, design of data acquisition models under different scanning modes, and design of image reconstruction algorithm. After the design of the CTSim, the proposed CTSim was tested in every step of CT imaging.

Results

Systematic verification demonstrated that the proposed CTSim can not only perform raw CT data acquisition, image reconstruction, basic image processing, and image quality analysis like a real CT scanner, but can also simulate the formation of artifacts. The CTSim can completely get rid of the hardware and achieve the same experimental results as the hardware instrument.

Conclusion

The proposed CTSim software shows several advantages such as low cost, less room accommodation, and no ionizing radiation damage and can be used as a virtual experimental training platform to enhance teaching and learning for general X-ray CT courses or for self-study of CT practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheng S, Luo W (2009) Design and implementation of the CT teaching experimental instrument based on microcontroller. Nucl Electron Detect Technol 29(5):1218–1221

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sang B, Xiang J, Ruan C, Shang R (2003) A computed tomography experiment instrument, its development and application to student experiment. Coll Phys 22(2):33–37

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang S, Yang S, Ai X (2017) The design of CT imaging simulation experiment. School 24:157–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu J, Qian J (2007) Design and implementation of a simulation system of CT scanning workstation. Microcomput Inf 23(10–1):224–226

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang L, Hu H, Xu X, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Gao C, Xu W, He Y (2019) Design and implementation of CT experimental teaching system on principle display and simulation operation and imitation diagnosis. J Baotou Med Coll 35(4):112–114

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Yu Q, Shu C, Tan R, He Q (2010) The simulation of CT filtering projection reconstruction using computer. Chin J Med Phys 27(2):1737–1740

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao D, Xiao J, Zhang J, Rang Q (2001) Two-dimensional fast Fourier transform and CT simulation. Coll Phys 20(7):41–43

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dong Z, Jing H, Bian Z, Niu S, Zhang H, Feng Q, Liang Z, Ma J (2015) A simple low-dose X-ray CT simulation from high-dose scan. IEEE T Nucl Sci 62(5):2226–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee CS, Reinhardt EB, Smith-Bindman R (2014) CTSim: an interactive computer simulation to learn the fundamentals of CT dose optimization. J Am Coll Radiol 11(3):255–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Man H (2009) Computed tomography in simurad - a medical imaging simulation software. Am Soc Eng Educ 14(352):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  11. Serna A, Chans MA, Ramos A, Ramos D (2016) Clinical application of a CT dose reduction simulator. Phys Medica 32:278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haddad P, Wong RK, Levin W, McLean M, Bezjak A (2004) Computed tomographic simulation in palliative radiotherapy: the Princess Margaret Hospital experience. Clin Oncol 16(6):425–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun H, Xie K, Gao L, Sui J, Lin T, Ni X (2018) Research on pseudo-CT imaging technique based on an ultrasound deformation field with binary mask in radiotherapy. Medicine 97(38):e12532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun H, Lin T, Xie K, Gao L, Sui J, Ni X (2019) Imaging study of pseudo-CT images of superposed ultrasound deformation fields acquired in radiotherapy based on step-by-step local registration. Med Biol Eng Comput 57(3):643–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peroni M, Ciardo D, Spadea MF, Riboldi M, Comi S, Alterio D, Baroni G, Orecchia R (2012) Automatic segmentation and online virtualCT in head-and-neck adaptive radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84(3):e427–e433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stowe J, O Halloran C, Photopoulos G, Lia AD, Quinn M, Tschan F, Verwoolde R, Buissink C (2021) CTSim: changing teaching practice in radiography with simulation. Radiography 27(2):490–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Javier C, Morvidone M, Nguyen MK (2015) Back-projection inversion of a conical Radon transform. Inverse Probl Sci En 24(2):328–352

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen HK, Vlgyes D, Martinsen AT (2018) Image quality with iterative reconstruction techniques in CT of the lungs-A phantom study. Eur J Radiol Open 5:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi HL, Luo SQ, Yang Z, Wu GM (2015) A novel iterative CT reconstruction approach based on FBP algorithm. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang C, Wu P, Gong S, Wang J, Lu Q, Tang X, Niu T (2017) Shading correction assisted iterative cone-beam CT reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 62(22):8495–8520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi HL, Luo SQ (2013) A novel scheme to design the filter for CT reconstruction using FBP algorithm. BioMed Eng OnLine 12(1):50–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buzug T (2008) Computed tomography. Springer-Verlag, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li B (2016) TU-AB-207A-00: CT systems course. Med Phys 43(6):3739

    Google Scholar 

  24. Makarov SN, Noetscher GM, Yanamadala J, Piazza MW, Louie S, Prokop A, Nazarian A, Nummenmaa A (2017) Virtual human models for electromagnetic studies and their applications. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 10:95–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang B, Fang SB, Li CS, Yin B, Wang L, Wan SY, Xie JK, Ding Q (2013) Digital three-dimensional model of lumbar region 4–5 and its adjacent structures based on a virtual Chinese human. Orthop Surg 5(2):130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kerkhof FD, van Leeuwen T, Vereecke EE (2018) The digital human forearm and hand. J Anat 233(5):557–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2017MH078) and Medicine and Health Science Development Plan of Shandong Province (202009040008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei Xue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, L., Lu, W., Wang, Z. et al. CTSim: a numerical simulator of computed tomography for high-quality radiological education. Int J CARS 17, 1257–1269 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02656-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02656-6

Keywords

Navigation