Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A force-sensing retractor for robot-assisted transoral surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose:

In robot-assisted transoral surgery, frequent retraction operations are essential to leave space for the surgical procedure. Commercial clinical retractors are simply composed of mechanical parts and cannot sense the touching force.

Methods:

We propose a new retractor for robot-assisted transoral surgery. It supports sensing of the touching force when retracting the tissues. By designing the structure of the force sensors based on small piezoresistive elements, we build a sensory system that is well integrated with the retractor for transoral surgery. After calibration of the system, a simple equation is computed to decode the resultant force as well as the center of the contact location.

Results:

A standard measuring test is designed for the force-sensing retractor. The result shows that the measured force is up to 15 N, and the sensed force precision reaches 0.08 N with a sampling rate of 98 Hz. The dimensions of the sensory system fit the retractor well.

Conclusion:

The experimental results demonstrate the potential of the proposed retractor in robot-assisted surgery. The retractor supports the provision of force feedback in an interactive manipulation mode and produces haptic information for the remote side in a teleoperated surgical robot system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ponraj G, Kirthika SK, Lim CM, Ren H (2018) Soft tactile sensors with inkjet-printing conductivity and hydrogel biocompatibility for retractors in cadaveric surgical trials. IEEE Sens J 18(23):9840–9847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Enayati N, De Momi E, Ferrigno G (2016) Haptics in robot-assisted surgery: challenges and benefits. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 9:49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdi E, Kulić D, Croft E (2020) Haptics in teleoperated medical interventions: force measurement, haptic interfaces and their influence on user’s performance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 67(12):3438–3451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puangmali P, Althoefer K, Seneviratne LD, Murphy D, Dasgupta P (2008) State-of-the-art in force and tactile sensing for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Sens J 8(4):371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bicchi A, Salisbury JK, Brock DL (1993) Contact sensing from force measurements. Int J Robot Res 12(3):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma D, Dong S, Rodriguez A (2021) Extrinsic contact sensing with relative-motion tracking from distributed tactile measurements. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 11262–11268

  7. Paydar OH, Wottawa CR, Fan RE, Dutson EP, Grundfest WS, Culjat MO, Candler RN (2012) Fabrication of a thin-film capacitive force sensor array for tactile feedback in robotic surgery. In: 2012 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 2355–2358

  8. Uddin R, Jamshaid A, Arfeen A (2021) Smart design of surgical suture attachment force measurement setup using tactile sensor. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Senthil Kumar K, Chen P-Y, Ren H (2019) A review of printable flexible and stretchable tactile sensors. Research 2019

  10. Burkhard NT, Cutkosky MR, Steger JR (2018) Slip sensing for intelligent, improved grasping and retraction in robot-assisted surgery. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3(4):4148–4155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Funk E, Baker A, Goldenberg D, Goyal N (2017) Retractors for transoral robotic surgery. In: Atlas of head and neck robotic surgery, pp 41–50

  12. Hasskamp P, Lang S, Holtmann L, Stuck B, Mattheis S (2016) First use of a new retractor in transoral robotic surgery (tors). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(7):1913–1917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Remacle M, Matar N, Lawson G, Bachy V (2011) Laryngeal advanced retractor system: a new retractor for transoral robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145(4):694–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi Y, Wu XD, Paydarfar JA, Halter RJ (2021) Imaging-compatible oral retractor system for use in image-guided transoral robotic surgery. In: Medical imaging 2021: image-guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling, vol 11598. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 1159807

  15. Jones LA, Hunter IW (1992) Human operator perception of mechanical variables and their effects on tracking performance. ASME Dyn Syst Control Div Publ DSC 42:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke S, Schillhuber G, Zaeh MF, Ulbrich H (2006) Telepresence across delayed networks: a combined prediction and compression approach. In: 2006 IEEE international workshop on haptic audio visual environments and their applications (HAVE 2006). IEEE, pp 171–175

  17. Tucker R, Lestini B, Marchant R (1996) Surface analysis of clinically used expanded ptfe endoscopic tubing treated by the steris process. ASAIO J 42(4):306–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jian J, Li-Li C, Xiao-Ping W, Ying F, Mao-Hai S, Ting L (2004) Effect of ultraviolet radiation on charge storage stability of porous ptfe and non- porous ptfe electret. In: Keping S, Gefei Y (eds) Recent developments in applied electrostatics. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 307–309

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Girbés-Juan V, Schettino V, Demiris Y, Tornero J (2021) Haptic and visual feedback assistance for dual-arm robot teleoperation in surface conditioning tasks. IEEE Trans Haptics 14(1):44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. El Rassi I, El Rassi J-M (2020) A review of haptic feedback in tele-operated robotic surgery. J Med Eng Technol 44(5):247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Key Technologies R &D Program under Grants No. 2019YFC0119303, the NSFC under Grants Nos. 62133009, 92148205, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Grants No. BK20211159 and the Zhishan Youth Scholar Program of SEU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lifeng Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not contain patient data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (mp4 21452 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Yang, S., Shen, J. et al. A force-sensing retractor for robot-assisted transoral surgery. Int J CARS 17, 2001–2010 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02677-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02677-1

Keywords

Navigation