Skip to main content
Log in

Ein Entscheidungsmodell für Cloud-Bursting

A Decision Support Model for Cloud Bursting

  • Aufsatz
  • Published:
WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK

Zusammenfassung

Der Cloud-Markt gliedert sich in Public Cloud-Computing (kommerziell vermarktet) und Private Cloud-Computing (selbst bereitgestellt). Das Konzept des Cloud-Bursting kombiniert Public und Private Cloud: Die Private Cloud (interne Ressourcen) stellt die Rechenkapazität zur Verfügung, aber ein Teil der Nachfrage wird in Public Clouds ausgelagert. Der Artikel stellt ein einfach anzuwendendes ökonomisches Entscheidungsmodell vor, das den optimalen Umfang der internen Kapazität bei und die Kostenersparnis durch Cloud-Bursting bestimmt. Das Modell basiert auf der Optimierung von Erwartungswerten mit stochastischer Workload und ist flexibel bezüglich der Wahl der Verteilung. Zwei empirische Beispiele demonstrieren die Einsetzbarkeit des Modells.

Abstract

The cloud computing market divides into public (commercial) and private (self-provisioned) clouds. The concept of cloud bursting combines public and private clouds: The private cloud (internal resources) provides the computational capacity, but a part of the demand is offloaded onto public clouds. This article proposes an easy-to-apply economic decision support model for determining on the one hand the optimal size of the internal capacity for cloud bursting technology, and on the other hand the cost savings. The model uses an expected value approach that considers stochastic workload and is flexible with respect to the distribution choice. Two empirical examples demonstrate the applicability of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  • Amazon (2012) Amazon EC2 pricing. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/. Abruf am 2012-03-20

  • Anderson PF, Martin JD (1977) Lease vs purchase decisions: a survey of current practice. Financial Management 6(1):41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anoep S, Dumitrescu C, Epema D, Iosup A, Jan M, Li H, Wolters L (2011) The grid workloads archive. TU Delft, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, Lee G, Patterson D, Ariel Rabkin IS, Zaharia M (2010) A view of cloud computing. Comm ACM 53(4):50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assunção MD, Costanzo A, Buyya R (2009) Evaluating the cost-benefit of using cloud computing to extend the capacity of clusters. In: International symposium on high performance distributed computing (HPDC), Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck R, Schwind M, Hinz O (2008) Grid economics in departmentalized enterprises. Journal of Grid Computing 6(3):277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beulen E, Fenema P, Currie W (2005) From application outsourcing to infrastructure management: extending the offshore outsourcing service portfolio. European Management Journal 23(2):133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibi S, Katsaros D, Bozanis P (2010) Application development: fly to the clouds or stay in-house? In: 19th IEEE international workshops on enabling technologies: infrastructures for collaborative enterprises, Larissa, S 60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaskovich J, Mintchik N (2011) Information technology outsourcing: a taxonomy of prior studies and directions for future research. Journal of Information Systems 25(1):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerbelaud D, Garg S, Huylebroeck J (2009) Opening the clouds: qualitative overview of the state-of-the-art open source VM-based cloud management platforms. In: 10th ACM/IFIP/USENIX international conference on middleware, Urbana Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Deelman E, Singh G, Livny M, Berriman B, Good J (2008) The cost of doing science on the cloud: the montage example. In: 2008 ACM/IEEE conference on supercomputing, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern J, Goles T, Hirschheim R, Jayatilaka B (2004) Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 35(4):6–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson G (1966) An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing 2(1):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Feitelson DG (2005) Workload modeling for computer systems performance evaluation. Unveröffentlichtes Buchmanuskript

  • Garg SK, Versteeg S, Buyya R (2011) SMICloud: a framework for comparing and ranking cloud services. In: Fourth IEEE international conference on utility and cloud computing, Victoria, S 210–218

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Godse M, Mulik S (2009) An approach for selecting software-as-a-service (SaaS) product. In: IEEE international conference on cloud computing, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal P (2010) Enterprise usability of cloud computing environments: issues and challenges. In: 19th IEEE international workshops on enabling technologies: infrastructures for collaborative enterprises, Larissa, S 54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood GB, Hermanson RH (1976) Lease-or-buy decisions. Journal of Accountancy 142(3):83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RW, Lewellen WG (1972) Analysis of the lease-or-buy decision. Journal of Finance 27(4):815–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kailasam S, Gnanasambandam N, Dharanipragada J, Sharma N (2010) Optimizing service level agreements for autonomic cloud bursting schedulers. In: 39th international conference on parallel processing, workshops, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang J, Sim KM (2010) Cloudle: a multi-criteria cloud service search engine. In: IEEE Asia-Pacific services computing conference, Hangzhou

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajeh-Hosseini A, Greenwood D, Sommerville I (2010) Cloud migration: a case study of migrating an enterprise IT system to IaaS. In: 3rd international conference on cloud computing, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajeh-Hosseini A, Greenwood D, Smith JW, Sommerville I (2012) The cloud adoption toolkit: supporting cloud adoption decisions in the enterprise. Software: Practice and Experience 42(4):447–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler P, Anandasivam A, Dan MA, Weinhardt C (2010) Customer heterogeneity and tariff biases in cloud computing. In: 31st international conference on information systems, Saint Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity MC, Willcocks L (2000) Global information technology outsourcing. In: Search of business advantage. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity MC, Khan S, Yan A, Willcocks LP (2010) A review of the it outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions. Journal of Information Technology 25(4):395–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht A, Seim K, Skiera B (2007) Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three-part tariffs. Marketing Science 26(5):698–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Yang X, Kandula S, Zhang M (2011) Comparing public-cloud providers. IEEE Internet Computing 15(2):50–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li Y, Liu T, Qiu J, Wang F (2009) The method and tool of cost analysis for cloud computing. In: 2nd IEEE international conference on cloud computing, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Lublin U, Feitelson DG (2003) The workload on parallel supercomputers: modeling the characteristics of rigid jobs. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 63(11):1105–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luftman J, Zadeh HS (2011) Key information technology and management issues 2010–11: an international study. Journal of Information Technology 2011(26):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall P, Keahey K, Freeman T (2010) Elastic site: using clouds to elastically extend site resources. In: 10th IEEE/ACM international conference on cluster, cloud and grid computing (CCGRID), Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateescu G, Gentzsch W, Ribbens CJ (2011) Hybrid computing – where hpc meets grid and cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems 27(5):440–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MathWave Technologies (2010). EasyFit statistical package

  • Mell P, Grance T (2009) The NIST definition of cloud computing. ITL National Institute of Standards and Technology

  • Mohan TS (2011) Migrating into a cloud. In: Buyya R, Broberg J, Goscinski A (Hrsg) Cloud computing – principles and paradigms. Wiley, Hoboken, S 43–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore S (2011) Gartner survey of CIOs in Asia shows cloud computing tops the technology priority list as businesses focus on growth in 2011 Gartner Inc., Hong Kong. Press release

    Google Scholar 

  • Motahari-Nezhad HR, Stephenson B, Singhal S (2009) Outsourcing business to cloud computing services: opportunities and challenges. Working paper

  • Oetiker T (2011) About RRDtool. http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool. Abruf am 2012-08-23

  • Opitz A, König H, Szamlewska S (2008) What does grid computing cost? Journal of Grid Computing 6(4):385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettey C (2011) Gartner maps out the rapidly evolving market for cloud infrastructure as a service. Gartner Inc., Stamford, Press release

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettey C, Tudor B (2010) Gartner says worldwide cloud services market to surpass $68 billion in 2010. Gartner Inc., Stamford, Press release

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj P (2011) Enriching the ‘integration as a service paradigm’ for the cloud era. In: Buyya R, Broberg J, Goscinski A (Hrsg) Cloud computing – principles and paradigms. Wiley, Hoboken, S 57–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rao AR, Hamed KH (1999) Flood frequency analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman Z, Hussain FK, Hussain OK (2011) Towards multi-criteria cloud service selection. In: 5th international conference on innovative mobile and Internet services in ubiquitous computing, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds E, Bess C (2009) Clearing up the cloud: adoption strategies for cloud computing. Cutter IT Journal 22(6/7):14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SC, Yeh YS (1982) On the distribution function and moments of power sums with log-normal components. Bell Systems Technical Journal 61(7):1441–1462

    Google Scholar 

  • Shroff G (2010) Enterprise cloud computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DM (2011) Hype cycle for cloud computing 2011. Gartner Inc., Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Staten J (2009a) Case study: USA.gov achieves cloud bursting efficiency using Terremark’s enterprise cloud. Forrester Research

  • Staten J (2009b) Which cloud computing platform is right for you? Forrester research

  • Strebel J, Stage A (2010) An economic decision model for business software application deployment on hybrid cloud environments. In: Schumann M, Kolbe LM, Breitner MH, Frerichs A (Hrsg) Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2010, Göttingen, S 47–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaquero LM, Rodero-Merino L, Caceres J, Lindner M (2009) A break in the clouds: towards a cloud definition. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 39(1):50–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchiola C, Chu X, Mattess M, Buyya R (2011) Aneka – integration of private and public clouds. In: Buyya R, Broberg J, Goscinski A (Hrsg) Cloud computing – principles and paradigms. Wiley, Hoboken, S 251–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker E (2009) The real cost of a CPU hour. IEEE Computer 42(4):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker E, Brisken W, Romney J (2010) To lease or not to lease from storage clouds. IEEE Computer 43(4):44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weekes PA, Chambers JC, Mullick SK (1969) Lease-buy planning decisions. Management Science 15(6):B295–B307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhardt C, Anandasivam A, Blau B, Borissov N, Meinl T, Michalk W, Stößer J (2009) Cloud-Computing – Eine Abgrenzung, Geschäftsmodelle und Forschungsgebiete. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 51(5):453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Tate M (2009) Where are we at with cloud computing? A descriptive literature review. In: 20th Australasian conference on information systems, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z (2011) Disrupt the disruptor: a theoretical approach of cloud computing on IT outsourcing industry disruption. In: IEEE 9th international conference on dependable, autonomic and secure computing (DASC), Sydney

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Lilienthal.

Additional information

Angenommen nach zwei Überarbeitungen durch Prof. Dr. Bichler.

This article is also available in English via http://www.springerlink.com and http://www.bise-journal.org: Lilienthal M (2013) A Decision Support Model for Cloud Bursting. Bus Inf Syst Eng. doi: 10.1007/s12599-013-0257-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lilienthal, M. Ein Entscheidungsmodell für Cloud-Bursting. Wirtschaftsinf 55, 69–81 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0357-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0357-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation