Zusammenfassung
Cloud-Computing hat Eingang in die öffentliche Diskussion gefunden, weil es ökonomische und ökologische Vorteile in sich vereinen und zu Effizienzsteigerungen und Energieeinsparungen führen soll. Letzteres ist bei steigenden Energiekosten für die Informationstechnologie (IT) von besonderer Bedeutung. Die vorgestellte Studie untersucht, ob die hierfür notwendigen Voraussetzungen auf Nutzerseite, wie das Wissen über Cloud-Computing und dessen Einstufung als unter dem Strich positiv, vorliegen. Die Analyse basiert auf einem aus der Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) und dem Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) kombinierten Untersuchungsrahmen für den Bereich von Cloud-Computing. Die Methodik umfasst zwei Verbraucherbefragungen, die eine zur Erhebung von Überzeugungen, die zweite zur Skalierung der Variablen. Zur Überprüfung der Hypothesen wird eine Strukturgleichungsmodellierung (SEM) durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse unterstützen den vorgeschlagenen Untersuchungsrahmen. Überraschenderweise spielt jedoch der Umweltfaktor keine Rolle für die intendierte Nutzung von Cloud-Diensten, und zwar unabhängig von deren Kenntnis oder Nutzung. Die Ergebnisse der Studie betonen die Bedeutsamkeit von mehr Kommunikationsmaßnahmen bei aktuellen und potenziellen Nutzern, insbesondere im Hinblick auf mögliche positive Umwelteffekte als Folge des Einsatzes der neuen IT-Infrastruktur.
Abstract
Cloud computing has been introduced as a promising information technology (IT) that embodies not only economic advantages in terms of increased efficiency but also ecological gains through saving energy. The latter has become particularly important in view of the rising energy costs of IT. The present study analyzes whether necessary preconditions for accepting cloud computing as a new infrastructure, such as awareness and perceived net value, exist on the part of the users. The analysis is based on a combined research framework of the theory of reasoned action (TRA) and the technology acceptance model (TAM) in a cloud computing setting. Two consumer surveys, the one to elicit beliefs and the second to gain insight into the ranking of the variables, are employed. This study uses structural equation modeling (SEM) to evaluate the hypotheses. The results indicate support for the proposed research framework. Surprisingly however, the ecological factor does not play a role in forming cloud computing intentions, regardless of prior knowledge or experience. Empirical evidence of this study suggests increasing efforts for informing actual and potential users, particularly in respect to possible ecological advantages through applying the new IT infrastructure.
Literatur
Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (Hrsg) Action control: from cognition to behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, S 11–39
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–2011
Ajzen I, Madden TJ (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22(5):453–474
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1):74–94
Bearden WO, Netemeyer RG, Haws KL (2011) Handbook of marketing scales. Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. 3. Aufl. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Behrend TS, Wiebe EN, London JE, Johnson EC (2011) Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges. Behavior & Information Technology 30(2):231–240
Bem DJ (1967) Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review 74(3):183–200
Bengtsson F, Agerfalk PJ (2011) Information technology as a change actant in sustainability innovation: insights from Upsala. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1):96–112
Berl A, Gelenbe E, Di Girolamo M, Giuliani G, De Meer H, Dang MQ, Pentikousis K (2010) Energy-efficient cloud computing. The Computer Journal 53(7):1045–1051
Berthon P, Donnellan B (2011) The greening of IT: paradox or promise? Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1):3–5
BITKOM (2013) Umsatz mit Cloud Computing steigt auf fast 8 Milliarden Euro. Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien e. V. http://www.bitkom.org/75316_75301.aspx. Abruf am 2013-06-03
Bose R, Luo X (2011) Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake green IT initiatives via virtualization – a theoretical perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1):38–54
Butler T (2011) Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: building theory on the role of Green IS. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1):6–26
Browne MW, Cudeck R (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research 21(2):230–258
Burton-Jones A, Hubona GS (2005) Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. Advances in Information Systems 36(2):58–77
Chen L, Gillenson ML, Sherrell DL (2002) Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management 39(8):705–719
Dao V, Langella I, Carbo J (2011) From green to sustainability: information technology and an integrated sustainability framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1):63–79
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3):319–340
Davis FD (1993) User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38(3):475–487
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8):982–1003
DesAutels D, Berthon P (2011) The PC (polluting computer): forever a tragedy of the commons? Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1):113–122
DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Neuman WR (2001) Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology 27(1):307–336
Durndell A, Thomson K (1997) Gender and computing: a decade of change? Computers and Education 28(1):1–9
Ellen PS, Wiener JL, Cobb-Walgren C (1991) The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 10(2):102–117
Enoch Y, Soker Z (2006) Age, gender, ethnicity and the digital divide: university students’ use of web-based instruction. Open Learning 21(2):99–110
European Commission (2012) Unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe. Brussels 27.09.2012. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/cloudcomputing/docs/com/com_cloud.pdf. Abruf am 2013-02-13
Fan X, Thompson B, Wang L (1999) Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling indexes. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1):56–83
Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Fishbein M, Stasson M (1990) The role of desires, self-predictions, and perceived control in the prediction of training session attendance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 20(3):173–198
Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly 19(2):213–236
Hackbarth G, Grover V, Mun YY (2003) Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management 40(3):221–232
Haws KL, Winterich KP, Naylor AW (2012) Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: how green consumers use motivated reasoning to prefer environmentally friendly products. Working paper, Texas A&M University, College Station
Heinssen RK Jr, Glass CR, Knight LA (1987) Assessing computer anxiety: development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior 3(1):49–59
Hildebrandt L, Görz N (1999) Zum Stand der Kausalanalyse mit Strukturgleichungsmodellen – Methodische Trend und Software-Entwicklungen. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/sfb-373-papers/1999-46/PDF/46.pdf. Abruf am 2013-02-24
Homburg C, Baumgartner H (1998) Beurteilung von Kausalmodellen – Bestandsaufnahme und Anwendungsempfehlungen. In: Hildebrandt L, Homburg C (Hrsg) Die Kausalanalyse. Schäffer Poeschel, Stuttgart, S 343–369
Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1):1–55
Jaeger PT, Lin J, Grimes JM, Simmons SN (2009) Where is the cloud? Geography, economics, environment, and jurisdiction in cloud computing. First Monday 14(5). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2456/2171. Abruf am 2013-03-10
Kim HY, Chung J-E (2011) Consumer purchase intention for organic personal care products. Journal of Consumer Marketing 28(1):40–47
Kinnear TC, Taylor JR, Ahmed SA (1974) Ecologically concerned consumers: who are they? Journal of Marketing 38(2):46–57
Klopping IM, McKinney E (2004) Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 22(1):35–48
Kumar K, Lu Y-H (2010) Cloud computing for mobile users: can offloading computation save energy? IEEE Computer 43(4):51–56
Ma Q, Liu L (2004) The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 16(1):52–59
Marston S, Li Z, Bandyopadhyay S, Ghalsasi A (2011) Cloud computing – the business perspective. Decision Support Systems 51(1):176–189
Mathieson K (1991) Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 2(3):173–191
Mell P, Grance T (2011) The NIST definition of cloud computing. Special publication 800-145. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg
Melville NP (2010) Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability? MIS Quartely 34(1):1–21
Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3):192–222
Ong CS, Lai JY (2006) Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior 22(5):816–829
Opitz N, Langkau TF, Schmidt NH, Kolbe LM (2011) Technology acceptance of cloud computing: empirical evidence from German IT departments. In: Proceedings 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Maui, S 1593–1602
Park SC, Ryoo SY (2013) An empirical investigation of end-users’ switching toward cloud computing: a two factor theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 29(1):160–170
Pensini PM, Slugoski BR, Caltabiano NJ (2012) Predictors of environmental behavior: a comparison of known groups. Management of Environmental Quality 23(5):536–545
Ratten V (2012) Entrepreneurial and ethical adoption behaviour of cloud computing. Journal of High Technology Management Research 23(2):155–164
Read W, Robertson N, McQuilken L (2011) A novel romance: the technology acceptance model with emotional attachment. Australasian Marketing Journal 19(4):223–229
Ryan MJ, Etzel MJ (1976) The nature of salient outcomes and referents in the extended model. Advances in Consumer Research 3(1):485–490
Saadé RG, Kira D (2007) Mediating the impact of technology usage on perceived ease of use by anxiety. Computers & Education 49(4):1189–1204
Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2010) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 3. Aufl. Routledge, New York
Serenko A, Turel O (2007) Are MIS research instruments stable? An exploratory reconsideration of the computer playfulness scale. Information & Management 44(8):657–665
Sheppard BH, Hartwick J, Warshaw PR (1988) The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research 15(3):325–343
Shih Y-Y, Chen C-Y (2013) The study of behavioral intention for mobile commerce: via integrated model of TAM and TTF. Quality & Quantity 47(2):1009–1020
Shin HD (2013) User centric cloud service model in public sectors: policy implications of cloud services. Government Information Quarterly. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/giq.2012.06.012. Abruf am 2013-03-11
Shuja J, Madani SA, Bilal K, Hayat K, Khan SU, Shahzad S (2012) Energy-efficient data centers. Computing 94(12):973–994
SoSci Panel (2012) Offenes wissenschaftliches Befragungspanel. http://www.soscisurvey.de/panel/index.php. Abruf am 2013-02-24
Stobbe S, Nissen N, Proske M, Middendorf A, Schlomann B, Friedewald M, Georgieff P, Leimbach T (2009) Abschätzung des Energiebedarfs der weiteren Entwicklung der Informationsgesellschaft. Fraunhofer Institut für Zuverlässigkeit und Mikrointegration, Berlin
Teo T (2012) Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: an integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments 20(1):3–18
Terzis V, Economides AA (2011) Computer based assessment: gender differences in perceptions and acceptance. Computers in Human Behaviors 27(6):2108–2122
Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11(4):342–365
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2):186–204
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3):425–478
Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 39(2):273–315
Wang YS, Wu MC, Wang HY (2009) Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(1):92–118
Watson R, Boudreau M, Chen A (2010) Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly 34(1):23–38
Webster J, Martocchio JJ (1992) Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly 16(2):201–226
Weiber R, Mühlhaus D (2010) Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in die Kausalanalyse mit Hilfe von AMOS, SmartPLS und SPSS. Springer, Heidelberg
Whitely BE Jr (1997) Gender differences in computer related attitudes and behavior: a meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 13(1):1–22
Wu WW (2011) Developing an explorative model for SaaS adoption. Expert Systems with Applications 38(129):15057–15064
Zhang H, Liu L, Li T (2011) Designing IT systems according to environmental settings: a strategic analysis framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1):80–95
Zinnbauer M, Eberl M (2004) Die Überprüfung von Spezifikation und Güte von Strukturgleichungsmodellen: Verfahren und Anwendung. Schriften zur Empirischen Forschung und Unternehmensplanung der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Heft 21/2004. http://www.imm.bwl.uni-muenchen.de/forschung/schriftenefo/ap_efoplan_21.pdf. Abruf am 2013-02-25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Angenommen nach zwei Überarbeitungen durch Prof. Dr. Loos.
This article is also available in English via http://www.springerlink.com and http://www.bise-journal.org: Gottschalk I, Kirn S (2013) Cloud Computing As a Tool for Enhancing Ecological Goals? Analyzing Necessary Preconditions on the Consumer Side. Bus Inf Syst Eng. doi: 10.1007/s12599-013-0284-2.
Zusätzliche Information
Ergänzendes Onlinematerial kann unter folgendem Link abgerufen werden.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gottschalk, I., Kirn, S. Eignet sich Cloud-Computing als Instrument zur Förderung ökologischer Ziele?. Wirtschaftsinf 55, 299–314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0378-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0378-y