Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An integer programming approach for finding the most and the least central cliques

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of finding the most and the least “influential” or “influenceable” cliques in graphs based on three classical centrality measures: degree, closeness and betweenness. In addition to standard clique betweenness, which is defined as the proportion of shortest paths between any two graph nodes that pass through the clique, we also consider its optimistic and pessimistic versions, where outside nodes may favor or try to avoid shortest paths passing through the clique, respectively. We discuss the computational complexity issues for these problems and develop linear 0–1 programming formulations for each centrality metric. Finally, we demonstrate the performance of the developed formulations on real-life and synthetic networks, and provide some interesting insights based on the obtained results. In particular, our findings indicate that there are considerable variations between the centrality values of large cliques within the same networks. Moreover, the most central cliques in graphs are not necessarily the largest ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. COLOR02/03/04: Graph coloring and its generalizations. http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/COLOR03/ (2013). Accessed 9 Sept 2013

  2. Abello, J., Pardalos, P.M., Resende, M.G.C.: On maximum clique problems in very large graphs. In: Proceedings of External Memory Algorithms, DIMACS Series on Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 50, pp. 119–130. American Mathematical Society, Washington DC (1999)

  3. Bassett, D.S., Owens, E.T., Daniels, K.E., Porter, M.A.: Influence of network topology on sound propagation in granular materials. Phys. Rev. E 86(4), 041306 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bavelas, A.: A mathematical model for group structures. Hum. Organ. 7(3), 16–30 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bavelas, A.: Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22(6), 725–730 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boginski, V., Butenko, S., Pardalos, P.: Mining market data: a network approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 33(11), 3171–3184 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.cor.2005.01.027

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Boldi, P., Vigna, S.: Axioms for centrality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.2140 (2013)

  8. Bomze, I.M., Budinich, M., Pardalos, P.M., Pelillo, M.: The maximum clique problem. In: Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 1–74. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)

  9. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc. Netw. 28(4), 466–484 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Butenko, S., Wilhelm, W.E.: Clique-detection models in computational biochemistry and genomics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 173(1), 1–17 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, T., Hu, Y.: The university of florida sparse matrix collection. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 38(1), 1–25 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. DIMACS: 10th DIMACS implementation challenge. Available at http://www.cc.gatech.edu/dimacs10/index.shtml. Accessed Sept 2013 (2011)

  13. Dolev, S., Elovici, Y., Puzis, R., Zilberman, P.: Incremental deployment of network monitors based on group betweenness centrality. Inf. Process. Lett. 109(20), 1172–1176 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ercsey-Ravasz, m, Lichtenwalter, R.N., Chawla, N.V., Toroczkai, Z.: Range-limited centrality measures in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 85(6), 066103 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Erdős, P., Rényi, A.: On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen 6, 290–297 (1959)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Estrada, E.: Path Laplacian matrices: introduction and application to the analysis of consensus in networks. Linear Algebra Appl. 436(9), 3373–3391 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Everett, M.G., Borgatti, S.P.: The centrality of groups and classes. J. Math. Sociol. 23(3), 181–201 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Everett, M.G., Borgatti, S.P.: Extending centrality. Models Methods Soc. Netw. Anal. 35(1), 57–76 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fink, M., Spoerhase, J.: Maximum betweenness centrality: approximability and tractable cases. In: Proceedings of WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation, pp. 9–20. Springer, New York (2011)

  20. Floyd, R.W.: Algorithm 97: shortest path. Commun. ACM 5(6), 345 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman, L.C.: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. 22(1), 35–41 (1977)

  22. Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1(3), 215–239 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gardiner, E.J., Artymiuk, P.J., Willett, P.: Clique-detection algorithms for matching three-dimensional molecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 15(4), 245–253 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garey, M., Johnson, D.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-completeness. Freeman and Co., New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Hagberg, A.A., Schult D.A., swart, P.J.: Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. In: Varoquaux, G., Vaught, T., Millman, J (eds) Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), pp. 1–15. Pasadena, USA (2008)

  26. Hage, P., Harary, F.: Eccentricity and centrality in networks. Soc. Netw. 17(1), 57–63 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kolaczyk, E.D., Chua, D.B., Barthélemy, M.: Group betweenness and co-betweenness: Inter-related notions of coalition centrality. Soc. Netw. 31(3), 190–203 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Koschützki, D., Lehmann, K.A., Peeters, L., Richter, S., Tenfelde-Podehl, D., Zlotowski, O.: Centrality indices. In: Proceedings of Network Analysis, pp. 16–61. Springer, New York (2005)

  29. Krebs, V.: Uncloaking terrorist networks. First Monday 7(4) (2002). Available at http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/941. Accessed 9 Sept 2013

  30. Leavitt, H.J.: Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 46(1), 38 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Luce, R.D., Perry, A.D.: A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika 14(2), 95–116 (1949)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Lusseau, D., Schneider, K., Boisseau, O., Haase, P., Slooten, E., Dawson, S.: The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54(4), 396–405 (2003). doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0651-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pagani, G.A., Aiello, M.: The Power Grid as a complex network: A survey. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(11), 2688–2700 (2013)

  34. Puzis, R., Elovici, Y., Dolev, S.: Finding the most prominent group in complex networks. AI Commun. 20(4), 287–296 (2007)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Puzis, R., Yagil, D., Elovici, Y., Braha, D.: Collaborative attack on internet users’ anonymity. Internet Res. 19(1), 60–77 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Reka, A., Barabási, A.L.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47–97 (2002). http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0106096

  37. Sabidussi, G.: The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31(4), 581–603 (1966)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, J., Peng, W., Wu, F.X.: Computational approaches to predicting essential proteins: a survey. PROTEOMICS Clin. Appl. 7(1–2), 181–192 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zachary, W.: An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. J. Anthropol. Res. 33, 452–473 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pattillo, J., Youssef, N., Butenko, S.: On clique relaxation models in network analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226(1), 9–18 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the AFRL Mathematical Modeling and Optimization Institute. The research was performed while the second author held a National Research Council Research Associateship Award at AFRL. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial an Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Chrysafis Vogiatzis & Panos M. Pardalos

  2. Air Force Research Laboratory, Munitions Directorate, Eglin AFB, FL, 32542, USA

    Alexander Veremyev & Eduardo L. Pasiliao

Authors
  1. Chrysafis Vogiatzis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Veremyev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eduardo L. Pasiliao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Panos M. Pardalos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chrysafis Vogiatzis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vogiatzis, C., Veremyev, A., Pasiliao, E.L. et al. An integer programming approach for finding the most and the least central cliques. Optim Lett 9, 615–633 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-014-0782-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-014-0782-2

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Chrysafis Vogiatzis View author profile