Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Army officer force profiles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore the optimization of US Army officer force profiles. An officer force profile describes the distribution of rank and specialty as well as age and experience within the officer corps. There are two different force profiles, the one that dictates the requirements or targets for a given force structure and one that defines the current population. We explore and optimize a force profile that meets current and future force structure requirements while incorporating information from the current and historical officer population. We propose a new network structure that incorporates both rank and years in grade to combine cohort, rank, and specialty modeling without falling into the common pitfalls of small cell size and uncontrollable end effects. This research is the first to address specialty and experience modeling in a manpower and force development model for US Army officers, modeling the entire officer’s career and developing an optimal force profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cashbaugh, D., Hall, A., Kwinn, M., Sriver, T., Womer, N.: Manpower and personnel. In: Rainey, L., Loerch, A. (eds.) Methods for conducting military operational analysis. Military Operations Research Society (2007)

  2. Collins, R.W., Gass, S.I., Rosendarl, E.E.: The ASCAR model for evaluating military manpower policy. Interfaces 13(3), 44–53 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gass, S.I.: Military manpower planning models. Comput. Oper. Res. 18(1), 65–73 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Grinold, R.C.: Manpower planning with uncertain requirements. Oper. Res. 24(3), 387–399 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Grinold, R.C.: Model building techniques for the correction of end effects in multistage convex programs. Oper. Res. 31(3), 407–431 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Grinold, R.C., Stanford, R.: Optimal control of a graded manpower system. Manag. Sci. 20(8), 1201 (1974) (0025–1909)

  7. Hall, A.O.: Validation of the enlisted grade model gradebreaks. In: WSC ’04: Proceedings of the 36th Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 921–925. IEEE (2004)

  8. Henning, C.A.: Army officer shortages: background and issues for congress. Tech. rep., Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress. Fort Belvoir (2006). http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA462381

  9. Henry, T.M., Ravindran, A.R.: A goal programming application for Army officer accession planning. INFOR 43(2), 111–119 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Holz, B.W., Wroth, J.M.: Improving strength forecasts: Support for Army manpower management. Interfaces 10(6), 37–52 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Price, W.L., Piskor, W.G.: The application of goal programming to manpower planning. INFOR 10(3), 221–231 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shrimpton, D., Newman, A.M.: The US Army uses a network optimization model to designate career fields for officers. Interfaces 35(3), 230–237 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew O. Hall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hall, A.O., Fu, M.C. Optimal Army officer force profiles. Optim Lett 9, 1769–1785 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-015-0947-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-015-0947-7

Keywords

Navigation