Abstract
The Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem-2 (SABLP-2) is defined as partitioning the tasks among stations in order to minimize the cycle time, given the number of stations. SALBP-2 reduces to the identical parallel machine scheduling problem with makespan minimization (\(P_{m}\Vert C_{max}\)) when precedence relations are ignored, providing a lower bound. In a certain layout setting, tasks revisiting the same station over consecutive tours might be preferable when the sole objective is to minimize the makespan of producing the order quantity. In this study, the tradeoff between the makespans obtained from SALBP-2 and (\(P_{m}\Vert C_{max}\)) as a function of order quantity is analyzed. A piecewise linear concave makespan function is observed. We developed an alternative model formulation and an iterative solution scheme for makespan minimization for all possible order quantities. The results of our computational experiment indicate that SALBP-2 outperforms for small order quantities, whereas (\(P_{m}\Vert C_{max}\)) yields the best results for larger order quantities. However, there is a certain range of order quantity for which the proposed model dominates the other two. Our results are validated in benchmark instances.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Scholl, A.: Data of assembly line balancing problems. Schriften zur Quantitativen Betriebswirtschaftslehre 16/93. TU Darmstadt (1993)
Scholl, A.: Balancing and sequencing assembly lines, 2nd edn. Physica, Heidelberg (1999)
Baybars, I.: A survey of exact algorithms for the simple assembly line balancing problem. Manage. Sci. 32(8), 909–932 (1986)
Scholl, A., Becker, C.: State-of-the-art exact and heuristic solution procedures for simple assembly line balancing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 168(3), 666–693 (2006)
Wee, T.S., Magazine, M.J.: Assembly line balancing as generalized bin packing. Oper. Res. Lett. 1(2), 56–58 (1982)
Bowman, E.H.: Assembly Line Balancing by Linear Programming. Oper. Res. 8, 385–389 (1960)
White, W.W: Comments on a Paper by Bowman. Oper. Res. 9, 274–276 (1961)
Pastor, R., Ferrer, L., García, A.: Evaluating optimization models to solve SALBP, Computational Science and Its Applications-ICCSA 2007. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007)
Ritt, M., M. Costa, A.: A comparison of formulations for the simple assembly line balancing problem (2011). arXiv: 1111.0934
Battaïa, O., Dolgui, A.: A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solution approaches. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 142(2), 259–277 (2013)
Potts, C., Whitehead, J.D.: Workload balancing and loop layout in the design of a flexible manufacturing system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129(2), 326–336 (2001)
Mallikarjuna, K., Veeranna, V, Hemachandra Reddy, K.: Design of Loop Layout with Integrated Batch Scheduling in Flexible Manufacturing System: an approach of stochastic heuristics. Artif. Intell. Syst. Mach. Learn. 5(1), 1–7 (2013)
Nearchou, A.C.: Meta-heuristics from nature for the loop layout design problem. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 101(2), 312–328 (2006)
Ma, S., Liu, Z., Shi, Y.: A dual-system method with differential evolution and genetic algorithm for loop-based station sequencing problem. Inf. Technol. J. 12(4), 728 (2013)
Saravanan, M., Kumar, S.G.: A design and optimisation of loop layout problems flexible manufacturing system using sheep flock heredity algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 77(9–12), 1851–1866 (2015)
Saravanan, M., Kumar, S.G.: Different approaches for the loop layout problems: a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 69(9–12), 2513–2529 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozcan, S., Eliiyi, D.T. & Kandiller, L. An alternative MILP model for makespan minimization on assembly lines. Optim Lett 11, 781–799 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-016-1056-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-016-1056-y