Skip to main content
Log in

No Data Protection please, we are British — Privacy, Porn and Prurience in the Digital Economy Bill

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Europäische Rechtskultur
  • Published:
Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Overshadowed in the public debate by the seismic shift in the legal and political landscape that the UK’s decision to leave the European Union brought with it, the Digital Economy Bill is currently quietly making its way through the legislative process. The paper discusses some of the data protection implications of the bill, with a focus on the proposed regulation of online adult content. It will argue that the bill is a paradigmatic example of the way in which data protection, or rather differential denial of data protection, can be leveraged to promote and enforce normative conceptions of sexuality, without having to explicitly commit the government to a “moral agenda”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burkhard Schafer.

Additional information

Prof. Burkhard Schafer Professor for Computional Legal Theory, School of Law, Edinburgh University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schafer, B. No Data Protection please, we are British — Privacy, Porn and Prurience in the Digital Economy Bill. Datenschutz Datensich 41, 354–359 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-017-0790-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-017-0790-3